Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Posted at 10:21 AM ET, 11/22/2010

Peggy Cooper Cafritz irked by black art platitudes at Katzen

By Jessica Dawson
Curator J.W. Mahoney leads a tour at American University's Katzen Center on Saturday. (Courtesy of Max Cook)

An impassioned plea to area art institutions to show black artists interrupted last Saturday afternoon's smile-and-nod curator's talk at "Catalyst: 35 Years of Washington Project for the Arts" on view at American University's Katzen Arts Center. During the exhibition walk-through with curator James Mahoney, arts patron Peggy Cooper Cafritz, victim of a devastating fire that destroyed her extensive African- and African-American-heavy art collection, asked why the black artists in "Catalyst" were so few and far between -- and why they were segregated to certain areas of the exhibition. Mahoney's platitude-ridden reply -- "I'm with you," "God Bless him," --- irked Cafritz, and rightly so.

Concerned with how to represent black artists in his show, Mahoney struggled to arrive at an adequate solution. Over the past decades, Mahoney explained, African American artists employed different strategies in their search for equality. According to the curator, some artists advocated for inclusion with white artists as a means to equality; others argued for being "separate to be enfranchised." Many of the "Catalyst" artists are arranged around exhibitions held by the non-profit Washington Project for the Arts, including exhibitions such as 1989's "The Blues Aesthetic: Black Culture and Modernism," which included both black and white artists. Mahoney's segregation of black artists largely followed the WPA's history.

Cafritz ventured that the problem stemmed from Washington's institutions -- both Smithsonian and private museums -- where African American contemporary art remains a rarity. She cited the Baltimore Museum of Art's 2009 exhibition of Hank Willis Thomas and iona rozeal brown's recent exhibition at Cleveland's Museum of Contemporary Art as examples of shows that should have happened in Washington.

Peggy, you're absolutely right. Isn't it time for the Katzen to step in? They've got the right space and they're in desperate need of an identity. What do you say, Jack Rasmussen?

By Jessica Dawson  | November 22, 2010; 10:21 AM ET
Categories:  Galleries, Jessica Dawson, Smithsonian  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Alec Baldwin, cakes and pies
Next: Gopnik's Daily Pic: Matthew Buckingham at Murray Guy


Please let me reply on behalf of the American University Museum as Jack Rasmussen is away and unavailable to answer the challenge posed by Ms. Dawson. The American University Museum is committed to showing great artists – local, national and international – who are diverse in background and offer as many viewpoints. However, we do this with a keen focus on the museum’s philosophy, which is built from the strengths and identity of American University. We have three areas of focus that include international art, politically engaged art and we are especially dedicated to supporting regional artists working in our community. Here is a link to our philosophy statement:

Since the museum opened in 2005 with an exhibition featuring the work of Sam Gilliam and Joyce Scott, we have continued to present solo and group exhibitions of black artists from around the world as well as others underrepresented in the art world including women and Latino artists. We realize there is more work to be done to exhibit artists who are underserved by museums and galleries and we will continue to be responsive to these needs, however, we feel that Ms. Dawson’s characterization of our museum’s program is both unfortunate and uninformed.

Stefanie Fedor
Assistant Director
American University Museum

Posted by: fedor1 | November 24, 2010 11:53 AM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.

characters remaining

RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company