The Independents: Understanding the Disillusioned

In conjuction with the Washington Post-Kaiser Family Foundation-Harvard University poll exploring attitudes of political independents, Behind The Numbers will take an in-depth look at each of the types of independents identified in the survey. Today's post focuses on the Disillusioned, independents who have lost faith in the political system.

The Disillusioned make up about 18 percent of independents and are largely disheartened by American politics today. They hold unfavorable views of both national parties, overwhelmingly feel unrepresented by the two-party system and express widespread feelings of frustration with today's politics.

Six in 10 Disillusioned say they do not lean toward either party and about the same number believe both parties are pretty much the same, though a third considered themselves partisan in the past. Most say a major reason they call themselves independent today is because they are not comfortable with either party.

The Disillusioned are slightly older than other independents (about half fall between the ages of 40 and 65) and they are less educated than other politically-engaged independents (77 percent have not graduated college). About a quarter profess no religious affiliation, and they are the least likely of independents to say they are born again or evangelical Christians. About one in six live in union households.

Anger and frustration have driven the Disillusioned from the party system, but what views would they like to see represented and how will they affect the 2008 presidential election? Much more after the jump.

The Disillusioned express intense levels of concern about four issues: the situation in Iraq, corruption in government, health care and the economy.

Half or more say the situation in Iraq, corruption in government and health care are extremely important to them personally. About four in 10 say the economy is extremely important.

On each of these issues, six in 10 or more say that neither party better represents their views.

Where do the Disillusioned stand on their top issues?

On Iraq: Two-thirds feel strongly that the war in Iraq was not worth fighting, and just 20 percent believe that the U.S. goal of bringing stability to Iraq is still possible. Disillusioned independents are among the few who do not side with either party on Iraq: 71 percent say neither represents their view, 60 percentage points or more higher than any other type of independent.

The Disillusioned are also among the most concerned about the impact of the war on terror: 63 percent say the U.S. government is not doing enough to protect Americans' civil liberties and 57 percent say the country is less safe now than it was before 9/11.

On corruption: Although they are deeply concerned about corruption, few feel that the two-party system will solve the problem. Three-quarters of the Disillusioned say that neither party better represents their views on the issue, and the same percentage says neither party can manage the federal government effectively.

On health care: A plurality of Disillusioned independents say they would like presidential candidates to focus on lowering the cost of health care and insurance over expanding coverage to the uninsured. And like Deliberators, fewer than half are willing to pay more to increase the number of insured Americans.

On the economy: The Disillusioned have a far more negative view of the economy than other independents. More than four in 10 describe it as "poor" while only 24 percent say it is in excellent or good shape. For most in this segment of independents, this "not-so-good" economy has brought trying times: just two in 10 say they are getting ahead financially.

What are the Disillusioned looking for in 2008?

About half of Disillusioned independents say their past presidential votes have been split about equally between Democrats and Republicans, but right now, just 37 percent say they would seriously consider a Republican candidate for president and about half would do the same of a Democrat. But their preference lies outside the two-party structure. Nearly four in 10 say they would prefer that an independent occupy the White House for the next four years.

Disillusioned independents do not look upon the front-runners of either party with a friendly eye: nearly half say they definitely would not vote for Hillary Clinton and the same number definitely would not vote for Rudy Giuliani. But they are more open to an independent run from either Chuck Hagel or Michael Bloomberg.

Wherever their preferences lie, the Disillusioned appear somewhat less likely than other independents to be engaged in the campaign. As of now, just 46 percent say they are very interested in the 2008 race, while nearly one-quarter (more than all independents except the Disengaged) say they are not interested this time around. For the Disillusioned, frustration with the system and the possibility of a choice between two candidates they have already ruled out could lead them to stay home on election day.

By Jennifer Agiesta |  July 6, 2007; 10:47 AM ET The Independents
Previous: Post-ABC CCI: Consumer Confidence on the Rise | Next: The Independents: Finding a Home for the Dislocated

Comments

Please email us to report offensive comments.



In 2006 I registered and voted for the first time,I am a 30 year old native of Phoenix,Arizona,and I can tell you,it`s not just the disillusioned and disengaged former members of the other parties that make up the INDEPENDENT party,after watching politics for 10-15 yaers,I did not feel that either established party was taking this country in the right direction.

One issue that I feel that the american people have been ignored on is immigration,the ONLY problem with the 2 bills that recently failed to pass in the senate was the sections giving illegals amnisty,and the guest worker programs,neither of wich is necisary for the econemy.

So even new voters feel the current system of politics is broke,and that it is time for a new party,a new way of doing buisness.

Posted by: Steven Otten | July 6, 2007 11:34 AM

Fire the government. Elect the poor and middle class. Right now, we are being "served" by pampered elitists who seem to have larger agendas they think we can't understand - or won't like.

Posted by: Independant | July 6, 2007 11:49 AM

The first thing the disillusioned have to do is learn right from wrong.If one thinks there is no difference in both parties you're very misinformed.Learn what each party really stands for.

Posted by: Concerned Voter | July 6, 2007 3:44 PM

I'm wondering how a Bloomberg run would fly with independents. From the poll info it seems a lot of disillusioned independents will be staying home which is a sad commentary on our democracy. No candidate can be perfect. There seems to be a wide range of candidates this election season to choose from unlike the last midterm one with Kerry vs Bush.

Posted by: jleon | July 6, 2007 7:37 PM

To Concerned Voter: They first thing *you* have to do is learn not to act like you know better than the rest of us. That's one of the things I don't like about politicians in the two major parties. I believe in live and let live, not "let's shove our agenda down everyone else's throats -- it's for their own good." Looking at the big picture, the only difference I see between the two parties is *what* they want to shove down our throats.

Here are my predictions for the 2008 elections, regardless of who wins what:
1) taxes will be higher
2) government spending will increase
3) the US will be involved in more wars it shouldn't be involved in
4) more money will be spent on the school system, but test scores won't increase
5) that awful campaign finance reform law that restricts freedom of speech won't be repealed

Etc., etc. In other words, business as usual.

Posted by: jcn | July 7, 2007 12:09 AM

A simple equation:

Lawyer + politics = corruption squared.

Posted by: Old Timer | July 9, 2007 9:43 AM

To put it bluntly, 'our' representatives no longer represent 'us'. They represent big business and special interests. Period. They 'follow the money'! We need a purge in DC. It's time we got back to a government 'of the people, by the people and most all FOR the people'! And 'we the people' does NOT include those in this country ILLEGALLY!

Posted by: Barb | July 9, 2007 3:56 PM

In 2004 the arrogance and the governance of the National and Arizona Republican parties turned me into an Independent. I find little to like in the Democratic party although I voted for several in 2006 simply because they weren't Republicans and it had become apparent that the one party government that we had was not working. My biggest concerns have been the abuse of our Constitutional rights and the unprecedented powers assumed by the executive branch, all under the banners of "national security" and "we are at war." Presidential candidates of either party are going to find me a hard sell in the 2008 elections.

Posted by: Coyote | July 9, 2007 6:50 PM

In 2004 the arrogance and the governance of the National and Arizona Republican parties turned me into an Independent. I find little to like in the Democratic party although I voted for several in 2006 simply because they weren't Republicans and it had become apparent that the one party government that we had was not working. My biggest concerns have been the abuse of our Constitutional rights and the unprecedented powers assumed by the executive branch, all under the banners of "national security" and "we are at war." Presidential candidates of either party are going to find me a hard sell in the 2008 elections.

Posted by: Coyote | July 9, 2007 6:51 PM

Every American should become disafilliated after an election, including members Congress, the Judiciary and the Executive Branches. This idea of twisting arms to get the votes to pass legislation is an affront to proper governance. Party power should be illegal. Party power must be abolished with special-interest lobbyists. You want good governance? WE should be freed from the totalitarian tyranny of power monegering. Otherwise we shall continue to be slaves to inefficient governance. Is it a great surprise that Congress never works the way it should? Is it a great surprise that the Judiciary have philisophical battles to the point that we are about to re-segregate the races. WAKE UP PROPLE.

Posted by: Roger Cartier, North Providence RI | July 10, 2007 12:35 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 

© 2009 The Washington Post Company