Concealed Weapons an Ideological Showdown
The Senate today will take up an amendment to the Defense Authorization Bill from South Dakota senator John Thune that would let gun owners with concealed carry permits to take their firearms across state lines, if those states allow them.
In a 2008 CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll and one by ABC News in 2007, most Americans said they opposed to a general ban on carrying concealed weapons. In the ABC poll conducted just after the shootings at Virginia Tech, 55 percent said they were against a national ban on concealed guns. (The most recent read on state-level bans, from a May 2001 poll conducted by the National Opinion Research Center and Johns Hopkins University's Center for Gun Policy, found that 46 percent said any adult who passed a background check and a gun safety course should be allowed to get a concealed carry permit.)
In the ABC data, conservatives were most apt to oppose a national ban, with three-quarters against it, outpacing opposition even among gun owners themselves (66 percent opposed). Among liberal and moderate respondents, half (50 percent) said they supported a countrywide ban.
On this question, partisan divides were less drastic than the ideological ones, which could prove problematic for the Senate Democrats hoping to quash the amendment. A narrow majority of both Democrats (53 percent) and Republicans (52 percent) said they opposed a ban. But Republicans are more apt to strongly oppose the policy (38 percent compared with 30 percent among Democrats), and Democrats are much more likely to strongly favor it (35 percent compared with 22 percent among Republicans). Nearly six in 10 independents (59 percent) said they would oppose the ban.
Q. Would you support or oppose a law requiring a nationwide ban on people carrying a concealed weapon? Do you feel that way strongly, or only somewhat?
-- Support --- -- Oppose ---
NET Strngly NET Strngly
All 42 28 55 35
Democrat 44 35 53 30
Independent 38 25 59 39
Republican 45 22 52 38
Gun owners 30 20 66 45
All others 52 35 45 26
Lib/Mod 50 32 45 20
Conserv 23 17 75 57
SOURCE: ABC News poll, conducted April 22, 2007 among a random national sample of 394 adults.
By
Jennifer Agiesta
|
July 22, 2009; 11:26 AM ET
Categories:
Crosstabs
,
Guns
,
Polls
Save & Share:
Previous: Obama Earns High Marks as Commander in Chief
Next: New Palin Numbers
Posted by: bflorhodes | July 22, 2009 12:06 PM | Report abuse
Hurray for COMMON SENSE AND FACTS!
Americans today REJECTED the notion that a religious fundamentalist, or NEOCON carrying a concealed weapon across state lines is a good idea or even acceptable in any way, shape, or form.
Have your own gun accidents in your own state, thank you. It is a PROVEN STATISTICAL FACT that you are 40 TIMES MORE LIKELY TO HAVE AN ACCIDENT WITH IT THAN YOU ARE TO USE IT ON AN INTRUDER.
Go America!
Posted by: onestring | July 22, 2009 2:40 PM | Report abuse
I cannot say how surprised I was by concealed carry in Texas. I was sure there would be deadly shoot-outs but I was so wrong and that did not happen. I love the fact that the gun owner has to take a class. I think a class like that should be a requirement of any gun owner not just concealed carry. My problem with John Thunes admendment is that not all states have such a great class on concealed carry and I do not want people that been so trained having that right in Texas. If the the NRA wants my support they must support the same high standards Texas imposed on those given this special right national-wide.
Posted by: bradcpa | July 23, 2009 10:57 AM | Report abuse
Hmm, common sense and facts? The "40 times more likely" factoid is junk!
I offer http://stason.org/TULARC/society/guns-canadian/36-Isn-t-a-gun-in-the-home-43-times-more-likely-to-kill-a-f.html:
"Nevertheless, it was a misrepresentation of a meaningless comparison from a limited and poorly done study." Even W. wouldn't have to suppress science this bad.
"As everyone in the world knows, you'd have to be insane to" is a lame argument. In 1776, the ending to this sentence would have been: "allow America to institute democracy".
If you would look at states, like Texas and Florida, where concealed carry is common, you would find _no_ blood bath, while Washington DC, NYC and Oakland, CA have extraordinary murder rates.
Posted by: someone8 | July 23, 2009 4:45 PM | Report abuse
The comments to this entry are closed.











As everyone in the world knows, you'd have to be insane to let people carry concealed weapons. It's obviously the reason why the US murder rate is 10 times that of any civilized country. It's even dumber to carry one. I'm an veteran expert marksman from the Army who can't believe how stupid people can be (although after W - anything's possible).