Sotomayor's Smooth Ride

President Obama's nominee to the Supreme Court continues to win about 2 to 1 support among the public, including broad majorities of Democrats and independents, according to a new Washington Post-ABC News poll.

Nearly six in 10 (58 percent) say the Senate should vote to confirm federal judge Sonia Sotomayor, three in 10 (30 percent) oppose the nomination. That's a slight decline in support from last month, when 62 percent said she should be confirmed and 25 percent opposed seating the judge from New York.

Q. As you may know, Obama has nominated federal judge Sonia Sotomayor to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court. Do you think the U.S. Senate should or should not confirm Sotomayor's nomination to the Supreme Court?

June 2009

[Chart]

July 2009

[Chart]

Sotomayor is expected to easily win confirmation when the Senate takes up a vote on her nomination. The poll was conducted Wednesday through Saturday, as the Senate Judiciary Committee hearings on her nomination wrapped up.

Over the course of the month, support for Sotomayor's nomination held steady among Democrats (78 percent say she should be confirmed; 79 percent in June) and slipped insignificantly among independents (60 percent support confirmation; 64 percent in June). Support among Republicans went from 36 percent in June to 28 percent now. That drop is nearly all among GOP women, 22 percent of whom now back her confirmation, down from 36 percent in June.

Independent women are also now less apt to favor confirmation than they were a month ago: While 65 percent of them backed Senate confirmation in June, now, 54 percent support her. The judge's backing has held steady among men across party lines and among Democratic women.

Those on either end of the ideological spectrum were mostly unmoved in the past month - a wide majority of liberals backs her nomination (79 percent), while about half as many conservatives say the same (40 percent). Moderates still broadly favor her confirmation (65 percent) but opposition has grown 10 points since June.

Those who consider themselves feminists - who are disproportionately likely to identify as Democrats - are broadly in favor of confirmation - 71 percent to 22 percent. Sotomayor is the fourth woman nominated for the court and would join Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg as the only women currently serving on the nine-member bench.

Sotomayor would also be the first Hispanic to take a seat on the high court, and her support among non-whites (76 percent) far outpaces her backing among whites (52 percent).

Education has proven to be another consistent dividing line: those with college degrees continue to be more broadly in favor of confirmation than those with less formal education - 64 percent compared with 55 percent - while those with some post-graduate education are most widely in favor (75 percent say she should be confirmed).

By Jennifer Agiesta |  July 21, 2009; 6:00 AM ET Post Polls
Previous: Democratic Rifts on Budget, Economy | Next: The Numbers Behind the Music

Comments

Please email us to report offensive comments.



There you have it folks.
The polls are complete idiocy, as no real public opinion is captured.

FYI.
The general public opinion is that Sotomayor is just another attack on the US Constitution.

Her race based opinions against the white man are disgusting and right out of the mind of a cave dweller bigot.

Posted by: dottydo | July 21, 2009 10:20 AM

Well if the looney dottydo says so, we should each of us definitely ignore all facts to the contrary. If anyone has intimate knowlege about the mind of a cave-dwelling bigot, it is dottydo.

Posted by: lostinthemiddle | July 21, 2009 10:56 AM

dottydo,

you may have more credibility if you attacked the bad judges, in this case Alito, Scalia and Roberts. They have made a mockery of the Supreme Court, if you cant find anything wrong with their rulings and believe me any non party affiliated person can then sit down and be quite.......

Posted by: rharring | July 21, 2009 11:11 AM

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.



 
 

© 2009 The Washington Post Company