Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Posted at 2:39 PM ET, 01/ 7/2011

Public's take on cutting defense

By Peyton M. Craighill

Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates on Thursday announced proposals to cut $78 billion in the Pentagon's spending over the next five years. That's unusual news for a department that's seen rapidly increasing budgets for the past decade, and it may meet with public resistance.

Slightly more people oppose cuts to defense spending than support them, 52 to 44 percent. About a third of all Americans are strongly opposed to reductions while two in 10 strongly support them.

There is no consensus for cutting any one program in efforts to reduce the federal budget deficit. The December Washington Post-ABC News poll tested nine proposals for cutting the federal deficit and did not find majority support for any one item.

At 44 percent support, defense cuts were about the middle of the pack, with big partisan differences. Democrats were most apt to support such cuts at 54 percent. Defense was the number one target for Democrats for reducing the deficit (tied with support for reductions to the capital gains tax).

Defense cuts were much less popular among Republicans -- only 30 percent supported them and 69 percent were opposed. The 24-point partisan gap on support is about as large as it is for any item we tested. Independents roughly split the difference; 43 percent support such decreases and 50 percent are opposed.

Perceptions of the war in Afghanistan may play a role in setting budget priorities. Opposition to defense cuts spikes to 61 percent among those who say the war in Afghanistan has been worth fighting.

Q: I'm going to name some proposals that have been made to try to reduce the federal budget deficit. For each, please tell me if that's something you support strongly, support somewhat, oppose somewhat or oppose strongly.

                                  ---- % Support ---
                                  Total Dem  Rep Ind
Eliminating the mortgage interest 
 tax deduction for high income      49   49  40  57
Reducing SS benefits for wealthy    49   48  45  52
Increasing age for full SS benefits 48   46  49  50
Reducing defense spending           44   54  30  43
Reducing federal aid to agriculture 41   42  41  41 
Raising taxes on capital gains      43   54  28  44 
Reducing yearly increase in SS      36   37  28  40
Eliminating child tax deduction
 for parents                        34   35  29  38
Increasing gas tax by 15 cents      21   24  16  23

By Peyton M. Craighill  | January 7, 2011; 2:39 PM ET
Categories:  Federal Budget Deficit, Post Polls  | Tags:  Post-ABC, Washington Post-ABC News, defense, deficit, economy, polls  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Americans split on how to interpret Constitution
Next: About a third of Americans say Obama's presidency has improved race relations

Comments

Sigh!
The main thing that I remember back in 1992 was that the cost of a SINGLE army Tank would have MORE than covered the 1992 budget for the ENTIRE University of Houston's 11 Faculty (+ some 1300 students) Biology Department . . . . ONE Army tank!

Posted by: lufrank1 | January 7, 2011 3:55 PM | Report abuse

WaPo-ABC News poll? Nah, there's no credibility there.
About like the Odumbo White House. Don't believe anything that comes from WaPO/ABC.

Posted by: LarryG62 | January 7, 2011 3:58 PM | Report abuse

Hey LarryG62, what are you doing here? Beat it!

Posted by: jtinyaface | January 7, 2011 4:03 PM | Report abuse

WaPo-ABC News poll? Nah, there's no credibility there.
About like the Odumbo White House. Don't believe anything that comes from WaPO/ABC.

Posted by: LarryG62

----

It's probably also best to ignore anyone who resorts to 3rd-grade name calling when trying to make a point.

Posted by: stevie7 | January 7, 2011 4:06 PM | Report abuse

I just don't understand that all these kool aid drinkers that think anything other than fox news or the drudge report is nothing but lies. Usually I would ignore but I wish they would just avoid sources they think are biased. It's especially ridiculous because this article reflects a divided poll, what's to disagree with? Ah, it feels good to talk.

Posted by: jtinyaface | January 7, 2011 4:13 PM | Report abuse

What I'd really love is for some comment moderation. On many sites the commentariot is unreadable. NYT is superb in that regard.

Posted by: jtinyaface | January 7, 2011 4:15 PM | Report abuse

Americans pay for the R+D for everything making it almost free for the rest of the world...
that has got to stop...

Posted by: DwightCollins | January 7, 2011 4:19 PM | Report abuse

So,just remember any ABC/WAPO Poll is and always has been the most inaccurate and totally questionable poll around anywhere.

Posted by: Ralphinphnx | January 7, 2011 7:37 PM | Report abuse

I understand the GOP is already backing down on the large cuts they said they would make. There is no way to make substantial cuts in the budget without making large cuts in defense.

Posted by: tinyjab40 | January 7, 2011 9:04 PM | Report abuse

"Public's take on cutting defense"

Fear in America is palpable!
Restore the draft for all men and women to put some backbone back in America.

Vietnam Vet.

No! NO! No! Don't do that it's a socialist plot!

Osama bin Laden

Posted by: knjincvc | January 8, 2011 1:21 AM | Report abuse

If all of our defense material was made in two or three states we would be out of Iraq and Afghanistan now...and perhaps never have gone in the first place.

Posted by: hfaulk01 | January 8, 2011 2:38 AM | Report abuse

this is a very well written analysis of the numbers

Posted by: crickets | January 10, 2011 1:25 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company