The odds of NHL drafting success
By Kareem El-Alaily
This week, Caps 2007 first round draft pick Anton Gustafsson quietly left the Hershey Bears and headed back home to Sweden. AnGus, as the fanbase calls him, struggled with injuries since being drafted, first with his back and then with concussions. I wish Anton the best of luck and hope he picks up his career in the Swedish Elite League.
There is some angst in the fanbase over what this means. We all know that center is currently a position of great need for the Caps and it certainly affects the team to have a first-round center not pan out. Despite this high-profile bust, I’m going to defend George McPhee on his recent draft history by throwing out a few stats on the probability of draft success. Before I get to that let me quickly explain what I did: I collected first and second-round NHL draft data from 1990-2003 (courtesy of hockeydb.com) and subjectively assumed that a “successful” draft pick was someone who skated at least 200 career games or, if he goaltends, was in net for at least 50 career games. Obviously there are many grades of success (think Alex Ovechkin vs Matt Pettinger); however, for simplicity’s sake I assumed that the previously mentioned thresholds constituted a successful pick.
The results showed that...
- 68% of first round picks were “successful” choices
- Second round picks have a 30% success rate. Although AnGus cost the Caps an extra second-rounder to move up to draft him, that pick was not a lock to make it to the NHL.
- Players identified as centers and defensemen (pre-draft) work out roughly 74% of the time; goalies and wingers, on the other hand, work out at a 61% rate.
- 64% of Swedish first round picks were successful; however when you look at Swedes drafted in the bottom half of round 1, the outlook changes considerably. Of the 10 Swedes selected in positions 16-30 from 1990-2003, only four became NHL regulars (40%). Based on those odds, we should be grateful if the other Swede recently drafted in this position – Marcus Johansson – can stick with the Caps. If 11 is an insufficient sample size and you want to consider all non-North American players drafted 16-30 from 1990-2003, the success percentage climbs to 48%. The takeaway still holds: there are no locks in the bottom half of the first round.
- Only 50% of Russian first round picks were successful – part of the reason NHL teams are hesitant to draft Russians. For every Alex Ovechkin and Evgeni Malkin there are several Sergei Soins, Igor Knyazevs and Alexandre Volchkovs (how can we forget?) who never pan out. (If someone wants to speculate why Russians are less successful making the jump to the NHL, have at it.)
- The safest first-round draft choice is a North American center or defenseman, who pan out 78% of the time.
- Taking rounds 1 and 2 together, NHL draft picks averaged out to a 48% success rate from 1990-2003.
Now on to Caps-specific takeaways:
- The Caps drafting prowess from 2002-2008 has been well documented. Of the 14 players they drafted in the first round, all but three (Gustafsson, Sasha Pokulok and Joe Finley) are regulars in the line-up. Three of those successful 11 are franchise cornerstones (Ovi, Backstrom, Green). That’s a 79% hit rate for a gamble that usually gives you 68% odds of success.
- There were 36 first-round picks from 1990-2005 who never played an NHL game. A disproportionate number are Cap draftees: Pokuluk, Finley and Alexei Kharlomov. Gustafsson will likely join that infamous group when the book on his 2008 draft class is closed in a few years. As one blogger points out about the Caps drafting history, “when they were good, they were very good indeed. But when they were bad they were horrid.”
- Don't ask about where the Caps ranked against other teams in terms of draft success from 1990-2003. Only the Rangers and Blackhawks had less success over that 13 year span.
- Using the 48% success benchmark for drafting out of the first two rounds, McPhee is at a 60% success rate from 2002-2008 assuming Varly, Neuvirth, Fehr, Carlson and Alzner become full-time regulars and eclipse the minimum “success” threshold, a fairly safe bet. Overall, this indicates that McPhee has been an above-average drafter since 2002, even with the AnGus bust.
Some final thoughts: The draft is still a crapshoot and every team has their hits and misses. I always struggle with people saying “why didn’t we take Tyler Ennis instead of Gustafsson?” or “why didn’t we draft Ryan Getzlaf instead of Eric Fehr in 2003?” You can play this game but it’s a zero-sum effort. For example, 28 teams wished they drafted Mike Green in 2004 before the Caps snagged him. So despite missing out on Anton Gustafsson I really can’t complain about McPhee’s holistic draft results since 2002. There have been some ugly misses, but he deserves credit for beating the draft odds and the numbers bear this out.
Box Seats blogger
| October 21, 2010; 2:32 PM ET
Categories: Capitals, Kareem El-Alaily | Tags: Capitals, Kareem El-Alaily
Save & Share: Previous: Extra Points - 10/20/10
Next: Caps community relations updates
Posted by: GFisher1 | October 21, 2010 2:37 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: nicko | October 21, 2010 3:29 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: muddapucker | October 21, 2010 4:10 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: Section117 | October 22, 2010 7:49 AM | Report abuse
Posted by: capscoach | October 22, 2010 8:01 AM | Report abuse
Posted by: capscoach | October 22, 2010 8:04 AM | Report abuse
Posted by: topshelf_22304 | October 22, 2010 2:00 PM | Report abuse