Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Follow PostSports on Twitter  |  Facebook  |  E-mail alerts: Redskins and Sports  |  RSS

An early look at the Wizards defense

By Kevin Broom

A quick look at a basketball box score reveals a glaring deficiency — the info it contains about individual defense sucks. This means that half the game has long been relegated to guesswork, opinion and reputation.

The solution is straightforward: to collect new data. Since the NBA isn’t breaking speed records to track and publish defensive information, I’ve been doing it myself on and off for the past several seasons. The method is based on Dean Oliver’s defensive scoresheet, which he detailed in his book Basketball On Paper.

While in the past I’ve done some geeky tracking (including play types, court locations, tracking ball movement, steal attempts, deflections, and more), this year I’m focusing on the basics — shot defense, fouls that result in free throw attempts, and non-steal forced turnovers (such as travelling, bad passes, ball handling errors, etc.).  Steals, blocked shots, defensive rebounds and total fouls come from the box score.

While it’s still too early to draw any conclusions, some patterns are emerging. Unsurprisingly, the team’s defensive troubles have been the inability to make the other team miss (a team Defensive Effective Field Goal percentage (DEFG) of .544 vs. a league average .488) and poor defensive rebounding.

The big culprits so far are the big men – Javale McGee, Yi Jianlian, Andray Blatche and Hilton Armstrong. This is no shock because bigs have the most important defensive jobs, including help responsibilities and protecting the paint. As the bigs go, so goes the defense.

McGee at least is busy, involved in a third of the team's defensive possessions when he's on the floor. He's getting a stop just 45% of the time, though and his defensive rating (points allowed per 100 possessions) is 115 (the team's is 109). McGee’s problem is that hasn't forced misses when he's not blocking the shot. His individual DEFG is .532. Compare that with departed center Brendan Haywood's .328 defg back in 04-05. Even when Haywood's effectiveness diminished a bit the past few years, his DEFG hovered around .430.

Armstrong is reasonably active (involved in 23% of the team’s defensive possessions while he’s on the floor), and he's better than the other bigs at forcing misses (.484 DEFG), but he has just one forced turnover and six defensive rebounds in 40 minutes of court time.

Yi is just awful. His defensive rating is 133. His stop percentage (a measure of how often he prevents the other team from scoring when he’s involved in a defensive possession) is .376. On 32 defensive possessions, the opposition has scored 20 times. His DEFG is .642.

Blatche has not been an active defender (involved in just 16.4% of the team’s defensive possessions while on the floor — a low number for a big). His DEFG is .578, which is preposterous for someone of his size, length and athletic ability. His defensive rating (113) is a little better than the other bigs, but in large part that’s been fueled by luck — the opposition is shooting just 3-9 from the FT line off of his fouls.Make that a more realistic 6-9 and his rating leaps to 119.

The bigs aren’t the only weakness. Kirk Hinrich plays with effort, but has not been effective. His DEFG is .598, and his defensive rating is 124. He does okay forcing turnovers (1.5 non-steal turnovers per 40 minutes), but he's generally matching up with bigger players and they're shooting over him with ease.

What's good so far? Al Thornton leads the team in DEFG and defensive rebounds. His stop percentage is .720 (meaning he prevents the other team from scoring on 72% of his possessions so far) and his defensive rating is a team-leading 65.3. He’s involved in just 12.7% of the team’s defensive possessions while on the floor, which is actually a good sign for a perimeter player (perimeter guys have fewer help responsibilities than bigs). Guys aren't getting open against Thornton, and when they shoot, they're missing.

Prized rookie John Wall is off to an uneven defensive start. He’s generating turnovers at a high rate, forcing 1.6 non-steal turnovers per 40 minutes to go along with his outlandish steals numbers. His shooting defense has been weak, and teams have targeted him. He’ll need to shore up that portion of his game to become a quality defensive player.

By Kevin Broom  | November 3, 2010; 4:47 PM ET
Categories:  Kevin Broom, Wizards  | Tags:  Kevin Broom, Wizards  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Maryland basketball preview: part 1
Next: When it comes to player leadership, how do the Caps measure up?

Comments

Thanks for the interesting breakdown. Obviously too early for meaningful data - please update us later in the season. Good job with the blog so far.

Posted by: cpb93 | November 4, 2010 10:38 AM | Report abuse

These are really interesting numbers. Are they being updated/posted somewhere, or just will be referenced in blog posts?

Posted by: japhy_ryder | November 4, 2010 10:42 AM | Report abuse

thanks for doing this. If you plan on updating this as the season goes, please provide a link.

Posted by: tedunni1 | November 4, 2010 12:28 PM | Report abuse

Well done, keep it up!

Posted by: sagaliba | November 4, 2010 12:34 PM | Report abuse

very interesting analysis. Send this to Ted's email.

Posted by: jefferu | November 4, 2010 1:16 PM | Report abuse

This is one of the more insightful articles I have read in this newspaper regarding the Wizards; particularly the defense. If you notice the opposition can drive the lane with little resistance displayed by the Wizards. The three point
popularity reduces further Wiz defensive
nonchalance. If i was coaching the opposition i would emphasize penetrating the lane versus the Wiz. They need to be more aggressive at staying in front of the man they are guarding; particularly in the fourth quarter.

Posted by: minboden | November 4, 2010 2:00 PM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company