Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
The new Washington
Post Weather website
Jump to CWG's
Latest Full Forecast
Outside now? Radar, temps
and more: Weather Wall
Follow us on Twitter (@capitalweather) and become a fan on Facebook
Posted at 1:45 PM ET, 03/ 1/2011

Christchurch: Before and after earthquake

By Jason Samenow

quake1.jpg

Last week, Steve Tracton shared climate researcher's Kevin Trenberth incredible eyewitness account of the devastating earthquake in Christchurch, New Zealand.

In separate correspondence, Kevin passed along an astonishing series of before and after photos of some well-known buildings in Christchurch, including only this commentary:

"It makes you appreciate how lucky we really are..."

All images in this post courtesy Kevin Trenberth. Keep reading for more photos...

quake2.jpg

quake3.jpg

quake4.jpg

quake5.jpg

quake6.jpg

quake7.jpg

quake8.jpg

quake9.jpg

By Jason Samenow  | March 1, 2011; 1:45 PM ET
Categories:  International Weather, Latest  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Recent March weather: In like lion, out like lamb?
Next: PM Update: Sunny Wednesday warm-up

Comments

Is it ironic that the newest, most modern structures built to expert building codes and watched every step along the way of construction by building engineers were the structures that suffered the worst damage? Meanwhile structures hundreds of years old that were built to no building codes and had no computer diagrams or structural engineers to help design them fared much better?

Posted by: rwalker66 | March 1, 2011 1:57 PM | Report abuse

Sobering.

Posted by: ennepe68 | March 1, 2011 1:57 PM | Report abuse

rwalker,
that would be ironic. i'm not disputing it, but from where did you get that impression? i would think the type of ground things were built on and the materials used would have a huge effect on the amount of damage.

Posted by: walter-in-fallschurch | March 1, 2011 3:19 PM | Report abuse

rwalker,
i don't think it's the case that old buildings did better than new ones. it's true that many buildings that were built to recent codes were damaged, but old ones were damaged even more so. i came across many articles with this same theme.

http://articles.latimes.com/2011/feb/26/local/la-me-quake-california-20110226

Posted by: walter-in-fallschurch | March 1, 2011 10:23 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2012 The Washington Post Company