Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Alexander's Victory Not Necessarily a Win for Moderation

By a nearly 2-1 margin today, Senate Republicans cast their lot with a colleague preaching a message of reaching out to centrist/independent voters -- a person who openly bragged about his bipartisan relationships with Democrats and who presents an older, gentler face to the nation.


The new minority whip, Sen. Jon Kyl of Arizona, left, listens as Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell talks with the media. (File photo - Getty Images)

Sen. Lamar Alexander (Tenn.), 67, won a resounding 31-16 victory over Sen. Richard Burr (N.C.) for the No. 3 leadership post, Republican Conference chairman, a race that was pitted very much along the generational and stylistic differences between the two men. Alexander's large victory does not signal any dramatic change in the Republican conference, nor does it herald a new age of bipartisan comity in the Senate.

Indeed, within 90 minutes of Alexander's win, Senate Republicans blocked a Democratic-preferred version of a fix to the alternative minimum tax law, which included higher taxes on private equity fund managers. And then, after that vote failed, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) took to the floor to applaud Alexander's victory, as well as Sen. Jon Kyl's (Ariz.) unanimous ascension to the minority whip post. After Reid's gesture, Republicans went on to block Reid from moving to a compromise measure on the AMT.

So the Alexander victory needs to be taken in context, not as something that will change the plate tectonics of the Senate GOP. It is still a conservative caucus, still a party that inside of Congress will go to great lengths to block the Democratic agenda.

However, the victory, particularly the margin of victory, should not be overlooked or brushed off by conservatives who prefer the confrontational approach adopted this year by Sens. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) and Jim DeMint (R-S.C.). Those two in particular have pushed the margins of parliamentary procedure this year, whether it was jamming up the works on the immigration bill supported by President Bush or forcing tough votes on special interest earmarks in spending bills.

With both men openly supporting Burr, his candidacy became a symbolic vote for whether that style would be embraced by their caucus. The conference chairman, after all, is the person in charge of presenting the party message, arranging press conferences and promoting Republicans on TV and radio. This leadership post, for all intents and purposes, is the face of the Senate Republicans.

And Burr lost badly, even losing support among perceived hard-line conservatives such as Sen. John Cornyn (Texas), who openly supported Alexander. "His point, I think, is a correct one: You can't just talk to your own base," Cornyn said after the vote.

Alexander, in a statement after the win, pointed toward this message again, noting his job would be to help "solidify our party's base while attracting more independents."

This is a message that is also being preached on the Republican presidential campaign trail by former New York City Mayor Rudolph Giuliani and Sen. John McCain (Ariz.), two men who had been viewed with great disdain by social conservatives for their views on abortion and campaign finance issues, respectively. Both men are trying to use their ability to attract independent voters, particularly in a race against Democratic frontrunner Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (N.Y.), as a major plank in their campaigns.

This internal battle within the Republican Party remains far from resolved, since Alexander's victory is just an internal caucus leadership race and nothing approaching the importance of a presidential nomination. And to some extent these secret ballot races turn on the one-to-one relationships senators have, not so much on ideological issues.

But having been so resoundingly beaten, Senate conservatives were grasping for explanations afterward. DeMint said he liked Alexander, that the Tennessean was plenty conservative enough for him. But DeMint said he still wanted a "new face" at the leadership table. "We've got to change the way we do things," DeMint said, noting that the change has to be in the GOP message and in their actions on the floor.

And Burr, 52, said there would be little difference, substantively, between him or Alexander in leading the conference. "I don't feel for a moment we've missed anything here but for a new generational face," he said.

By Paul Kane  |  December 6, 2007; 1:57 PM ET
Categories:  GOP Leaders , Senate  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Alexander Is the New Senate GOP Conference Chair
Next: Senators Slow to Endorse Colleagues in Presidential Race

Comments

Alexander stands out as a gentleman; a man who understands that advocacy is not dictatorship.

Of course, Alexander served as Governor and is accustomed to government helping people rather serving as a magnifier of idealogy.

Posted by: pach12 | December 6, 2007 8:32 PM | Report abuse

Thanks for the very good insight on how that idiot got the number three spot. Whatever happened to his trademark shirt, I thought it clearly defined his political thinking!

Posted by: rah1 | December 7, 2007 1:12 PM | Report abuse

Video: Many Americans Will Face Tough Winter Facing Rising Heating Prices, State Officials Say

Representatives from states across the U.S. speak in a conference cosponsored by the National Association of State Energy Officials about their challenges facing a winter with rising heating and fuel costs, particularly trouble low-income Americans will have paying heating bills with diminishing grants available at the same time of rising heating costs.

http://video.energypolicytv.com/displaypage.php?vkey=9b4005d41b8a46172e0c&channel=States

Posted by: Anonymous | December 7, 2007 2:23 PM | Report abuse

2008 Presidential Election Weekly Poll

http://www.votenic.com

The Only Poll That Matters.
Results Posted Every Tuesday Evening.

Posted by: votenic | December 8, 2007 6:24 PM | Report abuse

He isn't going to change the pattern of republican obstructionism, nor is he going to abandon their failed policies.
That said, if the crew of the Titanic wants a new skipper, I'm all for it. With the party hull down on the bottom of the sea, it's the perfect time to re-arrange the deck chairs.

Posted by: Dijetlo | December 9, 2007 4:45 PM | Report abuse

Listen to the tired rhetoric of the Republican Party. It's a broken record of fear-mongering slogans. Except now their a joke. Republicans are pro-military? Government is the problem not the solution? Let's run government like a business (Enron, Haliburton?)? No Taxes (borrow instead)? Uphold the Constitution? Rule of Law? Never filibuster? Give Judges or Legislation an up or down vote? And my favorite.....The Morality Party???!! Laughing yet? Slavish, boot-licking support of the disastrous Bush Administration has revealed the Rupublican Party for what it really is, spineless, principle-less ideologues. Good luck Sen. Alexander, I hear there's need for a few singing Senators, are you a tenor?

Posted by: thebob.bob | December 9, 2007 6:35 PM | Report abuse

2008 Presidential Election Weekly Poll

http://www.votenic.com

The Only Poll That Matters
Results Posted Every Tuesday Evening.

Posted by: votenic | December 11, 2007 5:16 PM | Report abuse

2008 Presidential Election Weekly Poll

http://www.votenic.com

The Only Poll That Matters.
Results Posted Every Tuesday Evening.

Posted by: votenic | December 12, 2007 4:36 PM | Report abuse

It's amazing to me that these Republicans can't see beyond the end of the Shrub's nose.

They should be rebuilding the GOP after the Bush/Cheney disaster. Instead, they're perpetuating the partisanship that's likely to take them down next fall.

Soon, the party of the "white dress shirts" will realize how much more diverse the country actually is. The so-called Republican "debates" makes it obvious that the party is so twentieth century, not part of the twenty-first century. All the candidates try to respond to the "base," but they don't realize that the "base" has changed--and they haven't.

Posted by: pacman | December 12, 2007 4:50 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company