Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Rangel Goes on Attack Over Post Story

Rep. Charles Rangel (D) defended himself today against allegations that he improperly solicited donations for a new center named after him in New York, calling on the House ethics committee to investigate him and excoriating Capitol Briefing's employer in the process.

Rangel convened a press conference this morning to address the questions raised by a Washington Post story about his fundraising and steering of federal money to the nascent Charles B. Rangel Center for Public Service at the City College of New York. You can read the full transcript of the press conference here, but suffice it to say that Rangel was not too happy with the Post story or a subsequent editorial published today.

"First of all, I normally advise people, as I have been advised, not to respond to these allegations that I abused my congressional discretion in writing on behalf of a school institution named after me because it would blow over; or, as more often I've advised members, that remember you don't have as much ink as the printers do," Rangel said. "So one of the things that I would use, hoping that it might catch on, is that I'm going to see how much damn ink The Washington Post has."

(An aside: The Washington Post has an enormous amount of ink, most of it stashed in a Strategic Ink Reserve hidden in a hollowed-out mountain in West Virginia. Capitol Briefing, however, writes a blog and technically works for, so he uses none of it. End of digression.)

After calling the charges "unfounded" and the Post story "foundless," Rangel got to the heart of the matter: Whether it was appropriate for him to use official congressional letterhead to arrange meetings with potential donors to the Rangel Center.

"As to the allegations, I challenge The Washington Post -- and if you can find some word a little stronger than that -- to show one line in any of the letters that I have sent out on behalf of the City College institution, which their board of directors decided to name after me, where there's a solicitation for funds," Rangel said. "In all of the letters that were sent to not-for-profit foundations, rather than as they say to people who may have business before my committee, I encourage them to meet with City College to learn more about the program."

As Capitol Briefing explored in more detail in a previous post, the letters Rangel sent to potential donors do not, in fact, contain specific solicitations for money. They say that Rangel simply wants to discuss his "vision" for the center, which he calls "a personal dream of mine."

But even though the letters don't mention donations, they still may be worthy of ethics committee scrutiny. The House ethics manual says that official House resources, including stationery, "must be used for the performance of official business of the House, and hence those resources may not be used for campaign or political purposes." Does raising money for the center constitute "official business of the House"?

Rangel himself said today, as he did yesterday, that he welcomed an ethics inquiry into that very question. In fact, he even encouraged the Post to make such a probe happen. Let's go back to the transcript, specifically of an exchange Rangel had with a Post reporter who was present:

RANGEL: Let me ask you one question: Would you help me to get this before the Ethics Committee by asking The Washington Post to file the charges?

Let me just ask them. They may not do it.

Let the record indicate that the reporter from The Washington Post failed to respond.

QUESTION: Sir, I think you carry more weight with the Ethics Committee than I do.

RANGEL: I think I carry more weight than you...


... but I'm testing barrels of ink, that's all.

QUESTION: I haven't got any barrels with me.

(Another aside: The Washington Post can't "file charges" with the House ethics committee, nor can any other outside entity. Only a House member can file a complaint against another member, or the ethics panel can choose to start an inquiry of its own volition.)

As for what was discussed at these meetings Rangel arranged, the New York lawmaker wasn't entirely clear. He said the purpose of the meetings was to bring business and foundation leaders together with City College officials to discuss the Rangel Center, but wouldn't quite answer whether he ever specifically asked anyone for money at the meetings. As for whether the "appearance" of what Rangel did was Kosher, let's return one last time to the transcript:

QUESTION: Do you think that meeting with business people who do have interests before the committee creates at least an appearance of a problem?

RANGEL: I don't want to get involved in some subjective stuff. I want to get involved -- did I violate the spirit of the law and any ethical standards that we have in the House of Representatives? After that, if you got nothing else to do, we'll talk about my appearance.

QUESTION: Mr. Chairman, isn't -- is an appearance sometimes in politics reality? Isn't that sometimes...

RANGEL: Yes, but I wasn't trained in all that psychiatric crap about what is reality and what is -- what the hell?

If there are people that can bring in some witnesses about how they look at me and what they think about me after 50 years in politics, for me to separate whether or not I'm as great as they think there is and separating appearances from reality, I don't know. I really don't know.

All I'm saying is that, because it's objective, the record should be abundantly clear by the Ethics Committee in terms of what you can, cannot, should not do, and say, even though it's not criminal as relates to the representative of the House of Representatives, it may have an appearance of impropriety or whatever else they may think.

But since I'm convinced that The Washington Post is only doing this to spin (ph) ink and would not push this thing in front of the ethics committee, as I am, then I'm using this forum to charge the Ethics -- strike that -- to ask the Ethics Committee to clear the air so that this question of what a member can or cannot do on official stationery will be cleared up.

Rangel, by the way, wasn't the only House Democrat to hold a press conference this morning. Speaker Nancy Pelosi (Calif.) also convened her weekly briefing, during which she was asked what she thought of Rangel asking for an ethics committee probe. "I support his request," she said.

By Ben Pershing  |  July 17, 2008; 4:20 PM ET
Categories:  Ethics and Rules  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Cheney Playing Diminished Role on the Hill
Next: Bloomberg Huddles With Senate Democrats


For uncensored news please bookmark:

New Attack on the Right to Vote
Kennedy, Palast Investigate
One million Democrats attempting to vote in this year's primaries found their names missing from voter rolls. WHERE THE HELL DID THEY GO?Palast and Kennedy

Law professor Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and journalist Greg Palast are launching an investigation. We want to know: where are these votes? Who swiped them? How? And how do we prevent it from happening in November?

The investigations team needs your help. RIGHT NOW. The not-for-profit Investigative Fund needs support to pay the cost of phones, airfare, microphones (hidden, when needed), detective agency fees, camera crew, researchers and all the infrastructure of inquest.

We need, right now, two dozen Producers to put up at least $1000 each to pay for the preliminary investigation and production. You'll get a tax deduction, a box loaded with DVDs of the finished films now planned from broadcast internationally - and maybe, just maybe, an honest election.

Because it's our plan to put out the information on the manipulation of the vote BEFORE November.
Can't put up $1,000? Then donate $500 and get a package of all of my books and DVDs signed to you. Even a $100 gift will be put to good use - and we'll send you my three latest DVD films, including "The Elections Files" (Watch the trailer) from our BBC TV investigations.

Bobby Kennedy, in his masterful article in Rolling Stone, exposed how Ohio votes vanished in 2004. The Palast team, for BBC Television, unmasked the vicious 'scrub' of Black voters in Florida in 2000.
Now Kennedy and Palast have joined together with an extraordinary team of investigators to hunt the missing votes of 2008 BEFORE we have a repeat of 2000 and 2004.

I haven't sought funding from you all this year - but now I must. Neither I nor RFK take a dime of compensation from the Palast Investigative Fund. But the fund's hit empty and we can't ask a our brilliant crew to continue to survive on dog food - they're beginning to bark at embarrassing moments!

Become a Producer and get personalized signed copies of the books RFK calls, "investigative masterpieces," my books, The Best Democracy Money Can Buy and Armed Madhouse.

Or donate AT LEAST $100 - try to make it more - and get Armed Madhouse (hardbound) and the CD, "Live from the Armed Madhouse," signed.

Our investigation is non-partisan. It's not about saving Democrats, but saving DEMOCRACY.

But we know who's playing games with the ballots.

FACT: On Super-Tuesday, the number of Democrats missing from voter rolls in New Mexico exceeded George Bush's 2004 'victory' total by 300%. No wonder McCain's campaign says, New Mexico is "in play." The question is who's playing with it?

Join our effort. If you've got a tip, a document, a witness - CONTACT US. And add your name to the list of Producers and Supporters.

Some Americans have taken a bullet to protect the ballot. All we're asking is that you take a tax deduction. Add your name in bold on screen as a producer of the film that will open eyes and stop lies.

Donate HERE - and PASS ON this request to friends and patriots. Let's stop the attack on democracy NOW - so we can make this the final investigation of a stolen election.

I can't tell you how much your support of our investigations has meant to us.

Greg Palast

Posted by: che | July 17, 2008 5:03 PM | Report abuse

You still don't address the issue of whether these foundations in fact had business before the committee. Rangel himself made that point multiple times. Why haven't you discussed this?

Posted by: Adam | July 17, 2008 11:31 PM | Report abuse

hang in there Charlie, the forces that are called repugs are out to get you big guy.

Posted by: angriestdogintheworld | July 18, 2008 1:34 AM | Report abuse

My, Rangel does speak well, doesn't he? Reading the transcript made it abundently clear that he is, without the slightest doubt, a politician.

Posted by: Enoch Wisner | July 18, 2008 10:36 AM | Report abuse

He is just like all the other dumbcrats in wash. He will lie ,cheat, do anything to win the next election, and why the poeple of harlem send that dispicable person back to congress boggles the mind.If he was my rep. he damn sure wouldn't get my vote. I would vote for a dog before I would check his name on a ballot.

Posted by: Elmerck | July 18, 2008 12:07 PM | Report abuse

Response to Elmerck: If you voted Republican in the last two Presidential elections, you did vote for a dog.

Posted by: Randy | July 18, 2008 1:56 PM | Report abuse

Response to Randy:
I did not vote for Bush, but I am glad he won. I have never voted for the winner of any presidential race, that is why I am voting for Obama.

Posted by: Megan9 | July 18, 2008 4:24 PM | Report abuse

I would have thought that the Washington Post would have more class than to get into a mud fight with a respected member of the US House of Representative over an allegation that he claims is false. Grow up and act as if you are a respected newspaper. My god, you're not in high school.

Posted by: Ross Williams | July 18, 2008 8:08 PM | Report abuse

Oh come on gutless wonder Madame Speaker
Nancy Pelosi and House Majority Leader
Loser Steny Hoyer show some guts here and
expell this Totally Corrupt Democratic
Congressman Charles Rangel here and now.
Stop giving all the crooked black Democrat
Political Hacks Like Charlie Rangel, and
Cold Cash Jefferson a Free Pass,just because they are black Pelosi & Hoyer!
So Madame Speaker Nancy Pelosi you have
have no damn right to call President Bush
"A Failure" when your the Biggest Failure
In All Congressional History Yourself
Here Pelosi and you damn well deserve to
be thrown out of Congress yourself Pelosi.
Its time the voters vote every crooked and
corrupt Incumbent Member Of Congress Out!

Posted by: Sherry Kay | July 19, 2008 1:53 AM | Report abuse

Rangel and Pelosi are corrupt. Drive them out of office.

Posted by: A Democrat | July 20, 2008 6:11 PM | Report abuse

As a New Yorker I have the advantage (or pehaps disadvantage) of seeing Charlie Rangle's actions a bit closer than the partisans who just evoke their party affiliation in their postings. Rangle could continue to hold his seat even if he was dead because his gerrymandered distrct insures his instant re-election. The current question about Rangle's actions on behalf of the center named in his behalf should not be limited to these masked solicitations. In fact he has secured 1 of those pork barrel ear marks for the center as well so that federal tax dollars are also going to support this momument to his ego. Ironically he has also been recently exposed as having the leases on 4 rent stabilized apartments in a prestigeous NYC building. Under NYS rent stabilization law, you are allowed only 1 rent stabilzed apartment which must be your primary residence. One of these apartments Rangle admits was used for his political campaigns. To those non-NYC residents, rent stabilization insures that you will have an off-market/lower rent that if you rented at market price. Rangle has used his position for his own advatage for years. His conduct should have brought him before the ethics committee long ago. I also find it facinating that when the Post investigates a Republican, which it has frequently done, to most posters here that is ok; but when real issues of impropriety by the chairman of the ways and means committee is explored it is described by some as mud throwing.By investigating these actions, the Post not only does us all a great public service, it conforms to the highest standards & obligations of a free press.No political figure should ever be above the scrutiny of a free press.

Posted by: Alan | July 26, 2008 9:12 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company