Ethics Panel to Investigate Mahoney, Sort Of
Five days after the story first broke that Rep. Tim Mahoney (D-Fla.) allegedly paid off his former mistress -- and former staffer -- to keep her quiet, the House ethics committee has sprung into action. Only it's not exactly clear what the panel intends to do.
This afternoon, the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct put out this statement: "The Committee is aware of media reports alleging that Representative Tim Mahoney engaged in improper conduct related to personal relationships he may have had with one or more individuals. We are reviewing this matter in accordance with Committee Rules and intend to interview Representative Mahoney and other parties who may have information about this matter."
Now, sometimes the ethics panel starts investigations after an official complaint is filed by a member, and occasionally it launches a probe on its own. What it doesn't normally do is this -- announce that it is "reviewing" a topic without actually forming an investigative subcommittee. The statement also sparks more questions: Who exactly is the committee going to interview? Will it seek testimony from Democratic leaders?
This last issue is important, because Reps. Chris Van Hollen (Md.) and Rahm Emanuel (Ill.), the current and former chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, have both acknowledged talking to Mahoney about the allegations before the story broke. Republicans have been calling loudly for those two leaders and Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) to tell "what they knew and when they knew it," just as Republican leaders did during the scandal surrounding the behavior of Rep. Mark Foley's (R-Fla.) -- Mahoney's predecessor in Florida's 16th district -- with House pages in the last Congress.
Pelosi has called for an ethics investigation, so maybe the panel is simply responding to the fact that leaders of both parties have demanded a probe. But with Congress out of session and the committee making such an unusual public statement, it's anybody's guess at this point what the panel will actually accomplish before Election Day. After that, Mahoney may well be out of office and beyond the committee's grasp.
UPDATE 6:30 p.m. ET: Mahoney gave an interview today to the Associated Press, during which he admitted to "multiple" extramarital affairs, but said he broke no laws.
Mahoney acknowledged that he began an affair with Patricia Allen during his 2006 campaign. She went on to work for his congressional office, then his campaign. He eventually fired her -- he says over "performance issues" -- and she threatened to sue him for sexual harassment. Mahoney paid her off, though he contends that all the money came from his personal account, not his campaign or congressional budgets.
Mahoney also admitted to an affair with an official in Martin County, which was the beneficiary of hurricane relief funding from FEMA for which he lobbied.
As for his family, Mahoney told the AP: ""I do feel like I let them down. I just hope that they can understand I'm a human being. I never presented myself as being perfect."
October 17, 2008; 5:00 PM ET
Categories: Dem. Leaders , Ethics and Rules
Save & Share: Previous: How the Rescue Bill Politics Did (and Didn't) Change
Next: How the Economy Is Helping Democrats Downballot
Posted by: Cherokee85 | October 18, 2008 11:30 AM | Report abuse
Posted by: Ken, Dallas, TX | October 20, 2008 10:33 AM | Report abuse
Posted by: Anonymous | October 20, 2008 1:08 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: Anonymous | October 20, 2008 1:11 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: David from Seattle | October 22, 2008 7:20 PM | Report abuse
The comments to this entry are closed.