Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Visclosky Steps Aside as Chairman of Appropriations Subcommittee

Updated 4:30 p.m. ET
By Paul Kane
Rep. Pete Visclosky (D-Ind.), under federal investigation for his ties to a lobbying firm whose clients received tens of millions of dollars in funds with his help, has stepped aside as chairman of an appropriations subcommittee that controls spending on projects for the Department of Energy.

"Throughout my career in Congress I have conducted myself with integrity out of respect for the people who I represent, the House of Representatives, and myself. I have represented the people of Northwest Indiana to the best of my ability and I have always abided by the law and adhered to the rules and code of ethics of the House. However, as a firm believer in the institution of the House of Representatives, I intend to ask Congressman Ed Pastor to temporarily handle the Fiscal Year 2010 Energy and Water Appropriations bill during committee and House consideration," Visclosky said in a statement issued today.

It's unclear when Visclosky, who has now lost his top aide as a result of the probe, would resume full control of the subcommittee.

The House is scheduled to spend the next two months going through many of the 12 appropriations measures, first in committee and then on the House floor. Visclosky's action at this point in the process helps Democrats avoid the awkward political moment that would present itself if he still were to oversee the energy and water bill, which funds more than $30 billion in projects, including an average of $1.4 billion in special projects known as earmarks.

Federal investigators are probing Visclosky's ties to the now shuttered Crystal City firm PMA Group, where his former chief of staff served as a top lobbyist for the previous five years. Visclosky earmarked, on his own, more than $34 million worth of projects to PMA clients in the fiscal 2008 and 2009 spending bills, according to an analysis by Taxpayers for Common Sense. Visclosky disclosed last week that his office and members of his staff has been subpoenaed by a federal grand jury looking for documents related to PMA.

Over the last 12 years he has been the second largest recipient of campaign contributions from PMA's political action committee, its employees and its clients, more than $1.3 million in donations, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. The largest recipient of donations, Rep. John Murtha (D-Pa.), has not been subpoenaed in the investigation but defense contractors with close ties to the lawmaker, who chairs the Defense subcommittee on appropriations, have come under scrutiny.

And as the investigation intensifies, Visclosky's chief of staff, Charles Brimmer, has resigned from the office, according to Roll Call. Following House rules, Brimmer has officially informed the chamber that he was the recipient of one of last week's subpoenas.

By Paul Volpe  |  June 2, 2009; 1:42 PM ET
Categories:  Ethics and Rules  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: With McHugh Leaving, Trio of Republicans Vie for Top Armed Services Panel Slot
Next: Today on the Hill

Comments

About time!

Posted by: robinhood2 | June 2, 2009 3:19 PM | Report abuse

I don't know the details of this case, but I grew up in NW Indiana and found Rep Visclosky to be a good guy. And this is coming from a Republican!

Posted by: Socaman | June 2, 2009 4:22 PM | Report abuse

In my dealings with Pete Visclosky, I have found him to be head and shoulders above some of the other Congressmen in the Midwest region.

Pete is intelligent, has common sense, and has served his constituents well.

Posted by: rural01 | June 3, 2009 9:41 AM | Report abuse

The Subcommittee was started by the Kennedy administration as a buffer so that the excutive staff wouldn't be hampered with outside agencies biding for govn't contracts. What the administration soon discovered was a system of 'kick backs', with govn't controlling not only how the contracts were handed but at that time the media also the subcommittee's soon became the operations for the favors system.

Posted by: edtroyhampton | June 3, 2009 1:39 PM | Report abuse

The Borgen Project has some good info on the cost of addressing global poverty.

$30 billion: Annual shortfall to end world hunger.
$550 billion: U.S. Defense budget

Posted by: atsegga | June 3, 2009 3:33 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company