Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Another Headache for Specter as FEC Allows Group to Press for Refunds to Republicans

By Dan Eggen
Newly minted Democratic Sen. Arlen Specter (Penn.), who already faces challenges from the left and right in 2010, may soon have to cope with demands for refunds by angry Republican contributors under a ruling issued Thursday by the Federal Election Commission.

The FEC voted 4-2 to advise the Club for Growth -- a conservative group tied to Specter's main GOP rival -- that it was within its legal rights to contact Specter donors and remind them of his pledge to provide refunds to any contributors unhappy with his party switch. When Specter announced he was leaving the GOP earlier this year, he promised to return campaign contributions from the 2010 cycle "upon request."

"The commission's decision is good news for thousands of Americans who contributed to Specter's campaign to elect a Republican, not to strengthen Harry Reid's Democratic majority," said the group's executive director, David Keating, referring to the senate majority leader from Nevada. "We look forward to helping Senator Specter make good on his commitment."

The FEC's decision provides another political headache for Specter, whose transformation into a Democrat has attracted more challenges than expected. Specter acknowledged that he switched parties in part to avoid a bruising primary fight with former Rep. Pat Toomey (R-Penn.), who nearly beat him the last time around and was running well ahead in polling among GOP voters. But now Specter also faces a challenge from the left by Rep. Joe Sestak (D-Penn.), who argues that Specter is not a true Democrat.

Thursday's ruling means Specter also will face a concerted effort to drain his finances by the Club for Growth, which was previously headed by Toomey. Although the Specter campaign gave back more than $200,000 during the second quarter of this year, that amounts to a small fraction of the nearly $11 million he has reported raising since his last election in 2004, according to campaign finance reports. As of June 30, Specter reported $7.5 million on hand compared to $4.3 million for Sestak.

Chris Nicholas, Specter's campaign manager, declined to comment.

The FEC, which keeps tight restrictions on the use of donor lists, ruled that the Club for Growth can send one letter or make one telephone call to each donor, but the group cannot sell their names, addresses and telephone numbers to others, or request contributions.

According to the opinion, any mailings "would inform contributors to the Specter Committee of Senator Specter's decision to switch to the Democratic Party and his policy of refunding contributions upon request. A preprinted form letter requesting a contribution refund and envelope addressed directly to the Specter Committee would be enclosed with the letter." In the case of telephone calls, the donor would be asked if they would like information about how to request a refund.

"Both the letter and the telephone call would inform contributors that the Specter Committee is not required by statute or regulations to refund these contributions," the ruling adds.

By Dan Eggen  |  August 27, 2009; 5:34 PM ET
Categories:  2010 Campaign , Fundraising Circuit  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Melancon Announces Challenge to Vitter
Next: Kennedy Motorcade to Stop at Capitol Saturday

Comments

I find this a bit comical. Supposedly, PACs give money based on a candidates ideals and ability to support their cause. I'm no fan of Specter, but his ideals, if he has any, didn't change when he changed labels.

Posted by: ProfElwood | August 27, 2009 7:16 PM | Report abuse

Specter should mail out the refunds after the elections in Pennsylvania. He's just an other Lieberman, they agree with the lobbyist that pays them the most. They both should be booted out the door.

Posted by: wasaUFO | August 28, 2009 12:15 AM | Report abuse


Few PACs will want their money back. All they care about is incumbency.

Individual Republican donors will want a refund. And that's perfectly reasonable.

Specter is a nasty fellow and reason enough for term limits.

Posted by: DagnyT | August 28, 2009 12:26 AM | Report abuse

Specter the real BAIT AND SWITCH ACTOR!
Campaign as a Republican, take their money and then run to the other side!
Of course he should be forced to return their money! Oh and by the why, didn't this two time turncoat do the same to the Democrats first? He should be forced to give their money back, too!
Time to pay up Specter!

Posted by: TexRancher | August 28, 2009 7:32 AM | Report abuse

Too bad the "Club for Growth" doesn't include emotional maturity as a measurement of "growth. Whiny crybabies.

Posted by: washpost18 | August 28, 2009 7:56 AM | Report abuse

if citizens of pa vote this crook back into office they deserve what they get

Posted by: pofinpa | August 28, 2009 10:21 AM | Report abuse

Poor Arlene, everywhere he turns he get's bad news. Maybe it's time he swallow the blue pill and go into the night! Wherever professional politicans go after being booted from their "rightful" office (in their mind).

Posted by: NeoConVeteran | August 28, 2009 12:09 PM | Report abuse

Russian Proverb: "You can't ride two horses with one behind".

Arlen Specter take note: Publicly funded campaigns would solve your current dilemna.

Posted by: curtnevan | August 28, 2009 1:56 PM | Report abuse

I voted for Arlen Specter as a Republican and I'll vote for him as a Democrat. Now, I can vote for him in the primary, too.

I'm curious how they are going to enforce the restrictions on the use of this list.

Posted by: lostinthemiddle | August 28, 2009 2:09 PM | Report abuse

Leave it to the Club for Growth to ask for a refund. In other words you didn't get your way and now, as a spoiled child, you're whining, kicking and screaming. So you wanted to BUY his votes?

Posted by: jckdoors | August 28, 2009 2:19 PM | Report abuse

maybe the DNC should now ask for money back previously given to Lieberman.

Posted by: leichtman | August 28, 2009 4:32 PM | Report abuse

Several people have compared Specter to Lieberman. But according to Wikipedia (and my memory), "During his re-election bid in 2006, he lost the Democratic Party primary election but won re-election in the general election as a third party candidate under the party label 'Connecticut for Lieberman.'"

Lieberman was elected as an independent and remains one. Specter was elected as a Republican and became a Democrat.

You can hate them equally. (I'm not a big fan of either.) But we should get the facts straight.

Posted by: highschoolteacher | August 28, 2009 6:15 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company