Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
On Twitter: CavsJournal and PostSports  |  Facebook  |  E-mail alerts: Redskins and Sports  |  RSS

Poll: What grade would you give Marc Verica's performance so far this season?

One of the biggest adjustments fifth-year senior quarterback Marc Verica said he had to make while growing accustomed to Virginia's new pro-style offense was how quickly he was expected to burst out of the snap. In a timing-based passing system, Verica also had to get used to throwing the ball to spots and trusting that his receivers would get there.

So far, Verica said he's been pleased with how he has performed, though he acknowledged "it's definitely not my best." Verica has completed 60.6 percent of his passes (No. 6 in the ACC) and thrown for 697 yards (No. 5), five touchdowns (tied No. 6) and one interception. His efficiency rating (138.4) ranks No. 6 in the conference.

It helped, Verica said, that he received more snaps with the No. 1 offense during training camp than he had at any other point in his collegiate career. He was not in the midst of a battle for the starting job, leaving him more time and energy to focus on developing a smoother rhythm with his receivers and offensive linemen.

"Even though I might not be competing for a starting job, I am still competing within myself, trying to raise my own standard," Verica said. "And I think that's what you have to do. You can't get comfortable if you're not in a quarterback race or something like that. You have to find something to push yourself to get better."

What have you thought of how Verica has played so far? Feel free to expand on your choice in the comments section below and/or e-mail me your thoughts at yandas@washpost.com.

By Steve Yanda  | September 30, 2010; 10:14 AM ET
 
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Verica: Seminoles don't blitz as much as people might think
Next: Dowling, McLeod 'look fine,' will play Saturday

No comments have been posted to this entry.

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company