Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
On Twitter: CavsJournal and PostSports  |  Facebook  |  E-mail alerts: Redskins and Sports  |  RSS

Al Groh? Who's that?

Al Groh has gone from the guy in the glass to the man behind the curtain. And just as the characters in the Wizard of Oz were instructed, the Virginia football players are paying Groh no attention this week. Not publicly, at least.

When last Groh was seen as Virginia’s head coach – following a 42-13 loss to Virginia Tech last November – he recited Dale Wimbrow’s poem “The Guy in the Glass.” On Saturday, Groh will face the Cavaliers for the first time since his departure as Georgia Tech’s defensive coordinator.

And while Virginia has been preparing for the Yellow Jackets’ triple-option offense and 3-4 defense for weeks, players are doing their best to ignore an obvious subplot to Saturday’s match-up. Groh, after all, led Virginia the previous nine seasons.

“I’m just going into it as another game,” sophomore linebacker Ausar Walcott said. “I’m just going to look at it as another game. I respect Coach Groh. He’s a real good guy, so I’m just going to go over there and play like it was any other game.”

“We don’t think about it,” junior wide receiver Kris Burd said. “It’s just UVA versus Georgia Tech. We’re just going to go out and play the 11 guys they put on the field.”

“Honestly, I’ve never thought about who the defensive coordinator was when we play other teams,” junior center Anthony Mihota said. “So I’m not going to start thinking about it now.”

What the Cavaliers are acknowledging is the threat posed by Georgia Tech’s unique, run-based offensive scheme. Led by senior quarterback Joshua Nesbitt, the Yellow Jackets lead the Atlantic Coast Conference – and rank No. 6 in the nation – in rushing offense (298.2 yards per game).

Virginia Coach Mike London said his team spent part of its bye week three weeks ago practicing against elements of the triple option. Defensive Coordinator Jim Reid ran an option offense was he was the head coach at 1-AA Virginia Military Institute from 2006-07.

Nesbitt – the ACC’s second leading rusher – is averaging 86.8 yards per game on the ground and has tallied six rushing touchdowns. He’ll be of particular concern to the Cavaliers, according to London, especially after a slew of missed tackles led to Virginia giving up 256 rushing yards in a 20-point loss to Florida State over the weekend.

“This is definitely an assignment-oriented football game,” London said. “But at the same time, you can have a guy on him, or two guys on him, and he’s good enough to make them miss.”

On the other side of the ball, Groh’s defense is struggling to transition from the 4-3 scheme the Yellow Jackets used last season to the 3-4 alignment. In the ACC, Georgia Tech ranks No. 8 in total yards allowed (347.8 per game) and No. 10 in points allowed (25.4 per game).

London said the Cavaliers also practiced against the 3-4 defensive alignment during their bye week, though he expects the way Georgia Tech will operate it Saturday will be far different.

“Nothing is like playing a 3-4 team from a guy that knows the 3-4 defense,” London said. “So that will be a challenge for sure.”

By Steve Yanda  | October 4, 2010; 5:17 PM ET
 
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Third-down inefficiency contributes to Virginia's early deficit against Florida State
Next: No word from London on McLeod's status for this week

Comments

I hope these young men are successful against Groh. He recruited most of them, and jerked around their careers so to play Ga Tech and beat him would be nice for them. They may not say it publicly, but there are probably a lot of grudges in the locker room that make this game a little more important to them. I hope Verica throws for 4 TDs and Keith Payne trucks through that 3-4 mess of a defense. Both of those players deserved better from Groh.

Posted by: ObamaInspired | October 5, 2010 9:15 AM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company