James Franco and Anne Hathaway will host the Oscars
Update: The Academy has issued a press release confirming that Anne Hathaway and James Franco will indeed host the Oscars, as originally reported by Deadline. (This blog post was updated after originally being posted at 11:38 a.m.)
Deadline is reporting that Anne Hathaway and James Franco *may* -- key word: may -- be hosting this year's Academy Awards.
The HBO-series-inspiring Nikki Finke reports that an offer has been extended to the multitalented actors and that it "looks like" both have accepted.
Here's hoping this is true. The concept of the "Love and Other Drugs" and "127 Hours" stars teaming up for the gig makes really, really good sense for numerous reasons. But here are the four most important ones.
1. Choosing Franco and Hathaway will finally demonstrate a commitment to a younger Academy Awards audience. Academy officials have long worried about Oscar ratings, especially among younger viewers. But while their more daring host choices -- Jon Stewart, Chris Rock -- have hardly been elderly, they wouldn't officially qualify as young, either; Rock was 40 when he hosted, and Stewart was 43. Franco and Hathaway, on the other hand, are 32 and 28, respectively. It's unclear whether their involvement will motivate 22-year-olds to tune in, but it's a step in the right direction.
2. Hathaway is multitalented. She joined Hugh Jackman onstage during the 2009 Oscars and knocked their portion of the musical number out of the park. And as she's demonstrated in everything from Sesame Street videos to her hosting turns on "Saturday Night Live," she can handle comedy as well as drama. We'd love to see what she does on a high-profile live program such asthe Oscars.
3. James Franco rules. We have established this time and time and time again. And his taping of "Inside the Actors Studio" -- which reportedly created such demand that more than 250 people were unable to get tickets -- only serves as one more piece of evidence. Choosing him as an Oscar host makes us feel all tingly inside ... and not because we've been smoking anything that Saul Silver would sell to us.
4. There is potential for both hosts to be Oscar nominees this year. Hathaway and especially Franco are both in the mix as possible nominees. To watch a host win an Oscar during the ceremony would be unprecedented and add another element of watch-worthy suspense to the event.
In short, if Finke's report isn't on the money, somebody should make this happen anyway. Stat.
Do you agree? Or are you still holding out hope for one of our previously suggested Oscar hosts? Post a comment and share your thoughts.
| November 29, 2010; 12:45 PM ET
Categories: Awards Season, Movies, Pop Culture | Tags: Academy Awards
Save & Share: Previous: Leslie Nielsen: Joining the crew of the big 'Airplane' in the sky
Next: 'The Walking Dead' -- Episode 5: 'Wildfire'
Posted by: mrsdorkusmaximus | November 29, 2010 12:06 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: blahblah6b | November 29, 2010 1:16 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: Russtinator | November 29, 2010 2:36 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: pirate1 | November 29, 2010 3:21 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: jimward21 | November 29, 2010 3:41 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: rusty6 | November 29, 2010 3:46 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: DorkusMaximus1 | November 29, 2010 4:43 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: RockCreekPark | November 29, 2010 4:43 PM | Report abuse
The comments to this entry are closed.