About Channel '08  |  Blog Partner: PrezVid.com  |  RSS Feeds RSS Feed  (What's RSS?)

Candidates Look Ahead to Indiana and North Carolina

Just hours ahead of the Pennsylvania primary, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are looking ahead to the next two battlegrounds: Indiana and North Carolina.

Obama's stumping in Indiana later today and Clinton has launched a TV spot just ahead of an appearance tomorrow.

Her new ad focuses on what she calls the state's biggest issues: "jobs, jobs, jobs." In the spot, she says the U.S. must "stop tax breaks for companies that move jobs overseas...stand up to China.. and fix unfair trade deals." If elected president, she boasts she could provide an additional five million jobs to Americans.

Meanwhile in North Carolina, Clinton is airing a followup to her "Ask Me North Carolina" ad, where she asked voters to submit questions for her to answer.

Here she's seen sitting at a backyard picnic table with voters, answering a question from David about veterans' health care -- a smart question to tackle in a big military state.

-- Ed O'Keefe

By Washington Post editors |  April 22, 2008; 4:03 PM ET Ad Watch
Previous: Candidates 'Brawl' on Monday Night Raw | Next: McCain Pushes N.C. GOP to Drop Obama Ad

Comments

Please email us to report offensive comments.



By saying she would bomb Iran if they threaten Israel, Hillary Clinton shows that she has lost her moorings in whatever ideals she once had. This is not a reasoned policy but a gratuitous threat, cynically engineered to appeal, it would seem, to her supposed blue collar base. It is war-mongering, uttered with complete disregard for the actual situation in the Middle East. She is becoming a loose cannon, whose voice is not only not needed on the national stage, it is dangerous.

Posted by: nedaille | April 22, 2008 7:53 PM


From "Head of State"
http://headofstate.blogspot.com/2008/04/best-way-for-obama-to-go-negative-go.html

Wednesday, April 23, 2008
The Best Way For Obama To Go Negative: Go Positive

The WP, via CNN, reports that there is now a discussion in the Obama camp as to whether he should go negative in Indiana.

Simply going negative would be a critical error, opening Obama to charges that he would be contradicting the very messages that have inspired his efforts and undergirded his campaign. This is a gap that the Clinton team would surely leap through. He would be further drawn into the swirling chaos that the old politics has created--as the Clinton camp would sure wish-- further enveloping and distracting voters from the fundamental messages of his campaign.

The best way for Obama to go negative is to go positive--clearly, strongly, and powerfully contrasting the method of "kitchen sink" politics, where any statement or position--even statements that are diametrically opposed; any claim, no matter how false; and any trivial distraction can be used simply in the effort to win at any cost, with the genuine effort to move the nation into a more substantive and honest politics--and into an Administration that will be grounded in these principles, rather than the very same methods and distortions that we can so easily see having been employed over the past seven years.

He should relentlessly tie the former method to the politics of the past--and to indicate the consequences for the nation that these politics have wrought--in the loss of national stature, Constitutional and moral authority, economic stability, and our most important treasure, the lives of our sons and daughters to a cause borne of such distortions.

I.e.:

"We have had enough of the negative campaigning of the past. We have seen what it has done to us over the past years--the "kitchen sink" politics of distortion and falsehood, of being willing to make any claim--no matter how true, false, inconsistent or contradictory--to put forward one's personal agenda, has threatened to take this great nation down the drain--financially, in terms of our standing in the world; in terms of our most important and basic treasure--the lives of our sons and daughters--the very future of this nation.

Do we want the same result? The same candidates, using the same old tactics, leading to the same outcomes of the all-too-recent past? Those who will do or say anything to be elected--and then will do or say anything afterward to justify their mistakes?

I say: We need a change from the politics of the past. We need someone who will say enough of the politics of the kitchen sink, of trivia and distortion. It's time to drain the sink. It's time for someone who , instead of fighting to divide the nation in pursuit of victory, will fight for you by saying: We will not play the same old games. That's the old politics. That's the politics that led us into Iraq, that left Osama Bin Ladin free, that led to violations of the Constitution that we solemnly pledge to uphold for this nation, and that has led us to be faced each day with the loss of promise that each new American life represents.

We can be seduced by politics of tactics, of fear. We've seen it before. And we've seen what happens after.

Will you join me in putting this era of old politics behind us, into a new future where you, your country, and the needs of your family and your future come first? Where we step beyond the tactics, distortion, and trivia of the moment, that too often have led to a long and difficult future for our nation, into to a time when the genuine needs of our nation and our country matter most?

Change is never easy. But when it is difficult, it is what we most often need. Will you join me in saying "No" to the kitchen sink politics of the past, to putting the era of old politics, of trivia and tactics, sniping and distortion, behind us? In saying "Yes" to a new and honest future, dedicated to the real needs of the American people, and not to the trivial battles that have divided and distracted this country for so long? To the real changes that this country has needed for the past 7 years, rather than to a continuation of the politics of the past? Will you join me? Can you join me? Let me hear it:

Yes we can (etc.)"

This should help to lead voters away from the churning pool of chaos and incitement, the distracting, impulsive song of the Clinton camp that, in its vague insinuations, pulls people to the seeming attraction and safety of the old--and will to help lead them towards an era where we can leave this ill-thought trivia behind for a considered, honest and principled statesmanship.

Cite:
Head of State
http://headofstate.blogspot.com/2008/04/best-way-for-obama-to-go-negative-go.html

Posted by: Robert Hewson | April 23, 2008 8:16 AM

As a North Carolinian, I'm thrilled the primary is extending out so far. Normally we don't really get a say. I think that whoever wins the democratic nomination can actually say this time that "America has already voted me in" I'm voting for Hillary Clinton in just a couple of weeks. She has the ability to resonate with even staunch republicans. Obama can get a crowd going, that's nice. I think he's a brilliant man. HIllary is just the better choice.

This constant haranguing toward Clinton to step down for the democratic party is insulting to every person in every state. If we want to get results quickly, we should do them all at once, or just let Iowa decide. When you say that the party has to come together now behind one candidate to beat McCain, you essentially declare that whatever all the states that came after the big super Tuesdays don't matter. It seems likely to alienate all the states that voted for her as well. The race isn't over, but please step down anyway. As if Ohio (swing state hello) wouldn't be antagonized by that.

In the end, Clinton or Obama will win North Carolina. I'm really glad my state finally matters just a little bit in selecting our nominee. Hey, in November we may even turn blue

Posted by: lizbet | April 23, 2008 10:49 AM

Last Week's Results Have Just Been Posted For The
2008 Presidential Election Weekly Poll
http://www.votenic.com
Vote to See Results.

Posted by: votenic | April 23, 2008 1:55 PM

People are losing site of the fact Hillary would be ahead if Micigan and Florida voters were counted. They will be in November and they will remember being disqualified.

Racism, yes it's alive and well and has been taught at Trinity church since 1979. Black Theology has been taught there since 1979. Black Theology teaches black people their problems are because of "white" people. Look it up, please. Also look up Nation of Islam, wikipedia.org/wiki/Nation_of_Islam, Black Muslim
and read the platform, this is in line with Black Theoeogy. Look at this link it shows Trinity has been teaching/preaching :http://chronicle.uchicago.edu/000316/hopkins.shtml , Why is everyone turning a blind eye to this?

Black Theology and Black Muslim have nothing to do with religon. Black Theology and Black Muslim is a MOVEMENT. Please read the links and decide for yourself. Black preachers of all dominations are teaching Black Theology, again, not a religon a movement.

Posted by: Us Voter | April 24, 2008 12:30 AM

check out this video!!!

youtube.com/watch?v=IcZwHuR_BMc

Posted by: PoliSye | April 25, 2008 9:55 PM

check out this vide0!!!

youtube.com/watch?v=IcZwHuR_BMc

Posted by: PoliSye | April 25, 2008 9:56 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 

© 2007 The Washington Post Company