Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Clinton, Gates blast Congress on Iraq funding cuts

Two top Obama administration officals took aim at Congress on Tuesday for refusing to provide more money for American diplomats who will assume a bigger role in Iraq as the American military mission winds down.
"The Congress took a huge whack at the budget the State Department submitted for this process of transition. And it is one of these cases where, having invested an enormous amount of money [in the war], we are now arguing about a tiny amount of money, in terms of bringing this to a successful conclusion," Secretary of Defense Robert Gates told an audience at the U.S. Global Leadership Coalition, a non-profit group.
Gates added that the situation reminded him of the last scene in the movie "Charlie Wilson's War" -- in which the U.S. government, having spent billions against the Soviet military in Afghanistan, then refused to put up a million dollars for Afghan schools.

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton lamented that as the U.S. withdraws the bulk of its forces from Iraq, "the military saves $15 billion. We ask for, you know, about one-tenth of that, and that's considered too much, even though there's savings accruing to our transitioning to the civilian side."
Their comments came during a roundtable on the administration's new global development strategy. Both Clinton and Gates have pushed for more funding for what they call a chronically underfunded State Department.
The State Department is taking over Iraqi police training from the military, and plans to open two new consulates and two temporary offices outside Baghdad to fill in for reconstruction teams. Because of the high level of danger, the State Department says it will have to hire thousands of additional security contractors.
Congress cut more than $500 million from the president's request for diplomatic and consular programs in Iraq in the 2010 supplemental spending bill. The Senate Appropriations Committee has sliced about $1 billion off the State Departments' 2011 request for operations in Iraq.
Lawmakers say that the budget is tight and that Iraq should be able to shoulder more of its own security costs.

By Mary Beth Sheridan  | September 28, 2010; 6:31 PM ET
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Israeli Foreign Minister breaks with Netanyahu over peace talks
Next: Obama takes action against Iranian officials involved in human rights abuses


Billions for corrupt Iraqui and Afghani politicians and crumbs for decaying US cities.
Does anyone really believe that Iraq and Afghanistan will ever be anything but the lawless hellholes they are?

Thanks Obama!

Posted by: dakine | September 28, 2010 8:39 PM | Report abuse

If the State Dept gets their money, they could start by paying compensation to the Filipino, Pakistani and Indonesian workers they shanghaied from Kuwait to Iraq to work as slave labourers on that temple of Hubris, the US embassy in Iraq.

Those workers who got on a plane with tickets to Dubai, and were then told at submachine-gun-point that they were going to Iraq, where their passports were confiscated, and they toiled in prison conditions, under gunpoint, shoeless and without helmets, on that monstrous ziggurat of megalomania, ten times bigger than the world's 2nd biggest embassy. Slave labourers building State's vision of the new "free" Iraq.

And maybe State could pay DECENT compensation to the victims of its Blackwater mercenaries, gunned down in cold blood at Nisoor Square and in so many other places.

"Because of the high level of danger, the State Department says it will have to hire thousands of additional security contractors."

More money to kill more innocent Iraqis.

Posted by: Bud0 | September 28, 2010 9:13 PM | Report abuse

It is such an absolute bloody joke that we can spend trillions of dollars in Iraq and Afghanistan. However, we can have starving children in our midst; unemployment at an alarming level, and a live recession to boot. Just get out of the aforesaid countries. Our administrations do just don't get it. Further, our State Department is out of the loop, too. Observe!! Unless we resolve the problems in the Middle East, we shall have Lebanons all over the world.

Posted by: prokofiev85 | September 29, 2010 12:16 AM | Report abuse

Hurrah for congress finally standing up to the O team, Bush lite, and realizing that the till is empty and the needs are more pressing here at home.
Not one more dime tossed into those sewers.

Posted by: llawrence9 | September 29, 2010 10:14 PM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.

characters remaining

RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company