Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Obama signals borders will be a focus of peace talks

President Obama on Friday signaled that Israeli and Palestinian negotiators might begin their peace talks by focusing on the potential border between the two states in order to overcome potential conflicts over Israeli settlement growth on the West Bank.

Describing his efforts to convince Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Nethanyahu to extend the 10-month moratorium, which expires later this month, Obama told reporters during a news conference: "Ultimately, the way to solve these problems is for the two sides to agree what's going to be Israel, what's going to be the state of Palestine. And if you can get that agreement, then you can start constructing anything that the people of Israel see fit in undisputed areas."

The borders-first approach has drawn increasing attention from Middle East experts, and has been endorsed by Arab figures such as Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak.

Then-President George W. Bush angered Palestinians in 2004 when he gave then-Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon a letter stating that Israel could expect to keep major settlement blocks as part as any peace deal, but increasingly officials believe that identifying upfront the settlement areas Israel could keep would reduce settlements as a source of tension between the two sides.

Still, the most contentious area of any peace deal is likely to be the division of Jerusalem, where Israel has already claimed Palestinian areas within its municipal boundaries -- and has surrounded the city with settlements. Jerusalem is expected to be the last item the two sides tackle. Other important "final status" issues include the right of return for Palestinian refugees, or at least compensation for the loss of homes, as well as security and control of resources such as water.

Obama launched a new set of talks between Israeli and Palestinian leaders this month, and Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton will travel to the Middle East next week to foster a second round of talks. The president acknowledged that "a major bone of contention during the course of this month is going to be the potential lapse of the settlement moratorium."

U.S. officials originally had hoped that the talks would have started at the onset of the moratorium, making it more difficult for Israel to allow it to lapse if the talks were making progress. But Palestinians balked at direct talks until recently, and now the administration has only a few weeks to demonstrate that the talks are a success. Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas has already warned that he will terminate the discussions if settlement construction begins again.

Obama said he is making the case that the settlement freeze should continue. "What I've said to Prime Minister Netanyahu is that, given, so far, the talks are moving forward in a constructive way, it makes sense to extend that moratorium so long as the talks are moving in a constructive way," Obama said.

But he noted that the prime minister faces a "very difficult" political environment in Israel, where members of his coalition have threatened to bring down the government if settlement construction does not begin anew. "One of the things that I've said to President Abbas is, you've got to show the Israeli public that you are serious and constructive in these talks so that the politics for Prime Minister Netanyahu -- if he were to extend the settlements moratorium -- would be a little bit easier," he said.

By Glenn Kessler  | September 10, 2010; 3:34 PM ET
 
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: 'Khost to Coast' fundraiser for CIA families gets a boost
Next: Intelligence surveillance court could become less secret

Comments

The Israelis are adamant about denying the Palestinian refugees and their descendents the right to return to their homes inside Israel. I believe this thorny issue would be solved if the Palestinians are given the choice of repatriation under Israeli rule or compensation and settlement in any of the Arab countries that will have them. No Palestinian in his right mind would wish to live under Israeli rule because he knows that any time the Israelis could legislate a law that will disinherit him, as they are doing now inside Israel proper and also in the occupied West Bank.This way one of the major Israeli phobias would be eliminated.

Posted by: abrahamhab1 | September 10, 2010 8:49 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company