Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Posted at 6:15 PM ET, 11/29/2010

Setback in case against accused NSA leaker

By Ellen Nakashima

Prosecutors failed Monday to persuade a federal judge in Baltimore to order the disclosure of the names of two expert witnesses who might be called in defense of a former National Security Agency official accused of leaking classified information to a newspaper reporter in 2006 and 2007.

U.S. District Court Judge Richard D. Bennett denied the request by prosecutors who are seeking to put behind bars Thomas A. Drake. The former NSA official is accused of sharing with a Baltimore Sun reporter information about waste and mismanagement of expensive technical intelligence analysis systems deployed by the NSA after the September 2001 terrorist attacks.

"We're pleased with the ruling, but this is an early victory in what's unfortunately a long process for Mr. Drake," said Jim Wyda, Drake's attorney.

Wyda said he saw the request by prosecutor William M. Welch II as an effort to control the process. "This is about keeping the playing field level," he said.

Drake's prosecution is one in a string of recent cases in what appears to be an aggressive effort by the Obama administration to punish accused leakers.

In the court hearing and in documents submitted to the court, the government argued it needed the names of the two computer forensics experts to gauge their "trustworthiness" to handle classified information.

"The United States has every right to be concerned about who the two proposed defense experts may be," Welch said in a brief this month. As an example, he said, officials know of "at least two retired NSA employees who discussed classified information with the defendant on unclassified systems, and at least one former NSA contractor who disclosed classified information to the defendant when the defendant had no 'need to know.'"

Wyda countered in a court brief that the prosecution's move is "a transparent attempt to gain an unfair tactical advantage" over the defense. He asserted that disclosure of expert witness names is required only of the defense decides to designate them as testifying experts.

The case is scheduled for trial on March 21, and if the defense decides to call them, Wyda said, their names will be disclosed.

Baruch Weiss, a criminal defense lawyer who successfully defended last year two former pro-Israel lobbyists against Espionage Act charges, said that under federal rules of criminal procedure, the defense must reveal its experts' names only if it has requested that the government do so. "The government gives up the names of its experts first before the defense gives up its names," Weiss said.

"The government's position drips with irony," Wyda said in his brief. "On the one hand, the government seeks the identify of the defense's consulting experts before the experts are to review any evidence, but on the other hand, the government has not made any ... disclosures, and certainly has not revealed the identity of any consulting or testifying experts, even though it has had that information since at least April."

A federal grand jury in Maryland indicted Drake in April on five counts of willful retention of national defense information, one count of obstruction of justice and four counts of making false statements. If convicted, he could go to prison for 35 years.

In May, an FBI translator was sentenced to 20 months in prison for passing classified information to a blogger. In July, the military charged an Army intelligence analyst in connection with the leak of a controversial video and the downloading and transfer of classified diplomatic cables.

By Ellen Nakashima  | November 29, 2010; 6:15 PM ET
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Iran and major powers will meet next week, sources say
Next: Gates: Warnings of WikiLeaks fallout overblown


People who leak classified information should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

They have a fiduciary and legal duty, and have signed a pledge not to disclose the information.

Posted by: Benson | November 29, 2010 6:40 PM | Report abuse


Page 370 or so in the big file they have

US PAID Klaus Barbie $1700 a month
AND let him into the US several times up into the 1970's.

Page 373 ? Check THAT one out - and then compare it to the censored DOJ 7 MB file.

NOT good to see.

This wasn't leaked by some greenhorn at the US DOJ.

Check it out before the site goes down.

Posted by: HRPuffinstuff | November 29, 2010 6:55 PM | Report abuse

We need whistle blowers to let us know when our own government officials are breaking laws. Claims of "national security" shouldn't be allowed to cover up official crimes.

Posted by: pundito | November 29, 2010 7:53 PM | Report abuse


welcome to:

The website wholesale for many kinds of fashion shoes, like the nike, jordan, prada, also including the jeans, shirts, bags, hat and the decorations. All the products are free shipping, and the the price is competitive, and also can accept the paypal payment., After the payment, can ship within short time.

3 free shipping

competitive price

any size available

accept the paypal

90X Extreme Fitness System ONLY ONLY 42 $$$$$$$

jordan shoes $ 32

90X Extreme Fitness System ONLY ONLY 42 $$$$$$$

nike shox $ 32

Christan Audigier bikini $ 23

Ed Hardy Bikini $ 23

Smful short_t-shirt_woman $ 15

ed hardy short_tank_woman $ 16

Sandal $ 32

christian louboutin $ 80

Sunglass $ 15

COACH_Necklace $ 27

handbag $ 33

AF tank woman $ 17

puma slipper woman $ 30

90X Extreme Fitness System ONLY ONLY 42 $$$$$$$

welcome to:

Believe you will love it.


Posted by: zhengee22 | November 29, 2010 7:53 PM | Report abuse

People who are arrogant and stupid should not be conducting our diplomacy. That criteria would eliminate about 75% of the State Department staff.

Posted by: Ruhu | November 29, 2010 9:53 PM | Report abuse

A German grocer was falsely obtained. the gorcer told the Truth... Beaten and Tortured. The top officials in the White house knew. How do get out the truth in a controlled environment?

Here steps in Wikileaks.. Truth comes out and they act like they can't stop them.

The end.

Nothing gets out that this government doesn't want out. Nothing!

This government can't say we're sorry but this is the best they can do. We are sorry Mr. gorcer...

That's like saying on some cable tv show there is a coverup on aliens. But don't worry we tell you the truth. We will show you what the government is hiding. Oh by the way this a corporate cable channel controlled by the government.

When did reporters become dusty old cowboys?

Posted by: DustyCowboy | December 1, 2010 5:44 PM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.

characters remaining

RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company