Wikipedia cancer info. passes muster
Admit it: When you want to bone up on a subject fast, you sometimes consult Wikipedia. I know I do. (I never use it as a source when reporting, of course.)
But when the subject you're boning up on is cancer, the stakes are higher than when you're just checking on, say, Lady Gaga. Under those circumstances, can Wikipedia -- written and edited by anonymous, non-expert people from all over the world -- be trusted?
That's what Yaacov Lawrence of the Kimmel Cancer Center at Jefferson (in Philadelphia) set out to determine. He and his team compared Wikipedia entries for 10 forms of cancer to those found on the peer-reviewed patient-information section of National Cancer Institute's online Physician Data Query (PDQ). The researchers assessed the entries for accuracy, comparing the information they presented to that found in standard oncology textbooks, and readability. Lawrence presented his findings at the American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meeting in Chicago Tuesday.
Turns out the Wikipedia entries held up well in the accuracy department; less than 2 percent of the material found in either the wiki entries or the PDQ differed substantially from that found in the textbooks.
That's the good news. The bad news is that the Wikipedia entries were much harder to read than the PDQ ones. The team determined that the wikis were written using language suited to a college student, while the language in the PDQs was suitable for a ninth-grader. That could make a big difference in a cancer patient's ability to learn about his or her disease. Lawrence says studying how that plays out in real life is the next step.
What Web sites do you turn to for medical information? Have you used Wikipedia to learn about a disease or condition? Share your thoughts in the comments section, and take a second to vote in today's poll.
Posted by: CheekyLibrarian | June 3, 2010 9:38 AM | Report abuse
Posted by: rlalumiere | June 3, 2010 11:15 AM | Report abuse
Posted by: Chasmosaur1 | June 3, 2010 12:27 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: gtf13 | June 3, 2010 1:15 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: zickzack | June 4, 2010 8:01 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: QBee1 | June 8, 2010 6:17 PM | Report abuse
The comments to this entry are closed.