Despite Test Scores, Shaw Is on the Right Track
On July 11, Brian Betts, principal of D.C.’s Shaw Middle School at Garnet-Patterson, was at Dulles International Airport about to leave for a vacation in Spain. He was feeling good. His first year running a school whose students struggle with poverty and neighborhood strife had gone well, he thought. Quarterly test results were encouraging. Attendance was up. Parents were happy. Some of his staff had gone so far as to enroll their own children at Shaw.
His cell phone rang. “Principal Betts? This is Chancellor Rhee.”
“Hi Chancellor,” he said.
“I wanted you to know that I am looking at the DC-CAS scores,” the D.C. Schools Chancellor said, “and you’re not going to be happy.”
“Okay,” Betts said. Uh-oh, he thought.
“You did not get the bump that you wanted to get,” she said.
“Okay,” he said. Not okay, he thought.
“But I want you to know I am not worried.”
Despite the brave words, it was not a good moment for Betts or Michelle Rhee. She considers him one of her best hires, an energetic, personable administrator stolen from Montgomery County. When celebrities or reporters asked to visit a school last year, she often sent them to Shaw. She arranged for me to visit several times for a series of columns on a principal’s first year.
Now her poster boy for reform appears to be in trouble, bringing I-told-you-so blog posts from many people who don’t like Rhee, her ideas or her brash style.
How bad was Shaw’s first year? It depends a bit on how you read the data. According to the State Superintendent of Education’s web site, Shaw dropped from 38.7 to 30.5 in the percent of students scoring at least proficient in reading, and from 32.7 to 29.2 in math.
But those were not the numbers Rhee read to Betts over the phone.
Only 17 percent of Shaw’s 2009 students had attended the school in 2008, distorting the official test score comparisons. Rhee instead recited the 2008 and 2009 scores of the 44 students who had been there both years. It didn’t help much.
The students’ decline in reading was somewhat smaller; it went from 34.5 to 29.7. Their math scores actually increased a bit, from 26.2 to 29.5. But Shaw is still short of the 30 percent mark, far below where Rhee and Betts want to be.
Is this the beginning of the decline and fall of Michelle Rhee and her pack of intense, data-spouting principals, like Brian Betts? Some experts and online commenters, smart people concerned about public education, think it is. They will not mourn the passing of this latest, and most self-confident cast in the endless melodrama of the D.C. schools.
I remain on the other side of the argument. Despite the sniping at Rhee, the best teachers I know think that what happened at Shaw is a standard part of the upgrading process. I have watched Betts, his staff, students and parents for a year. The improvement of poor-performing schools has been the focus of my reporting for nearly three decades. The Shaw people are doing nearly everything that the most successful school turnaround artists have done.
They have raised expectations for students. They have recruited energetic teachers who believe in the potential of impoverished students. They have organized themselves into a team that regularly compares notes on youngsters. They regularly review what has been learned, what some critics thoughtlessly dismiss as “teaching to the test.” They consider it an important part of their jobs.
That’s how it’s done, usually with a strong and engaging principal like Betts. His five days in Spain were marred by his worries over the test results. But after recharging his spiritual batteries at the Montserrat monastery, he came home convinced he was on the right track.
He had some good news. All of his teachers were back, except the three he fired last spring for failing to meet the school’s new standards. His first parent meeting in 2008 had only two attendees, but back-to-school night last week drew more than 100. On the DC-Comprehensive Assessment System tests in 2008, no Shaw boys scored Advanced, the top level, but this year, 15 reached that mark in reading and ten in math. Last winter, several eighth-graders begged Rhee to add a ninth grade so they could stay at Shaw. She said yes. About 100 students have enrolled.
Betts and his teachers have more plans. Last year, he said, “we weren’t a rigorous school.” His priority was to establish routines and security that would lead to academic gains. He did not emphasize homework, but that will change this year.
He is not new to disappointment. In Montgomery County 13 years ago, he was part of a team that nearly killed themselves raising standards for a new middle school full of students from low-income families. He was stunned to find that the school achieved no test score gains its first year. But the next year it began a surge that took it to a new level.
Numbers, he said, are just a way to confirm you are establishing a healthy relationship with each child. When the scores start going up, he wants to have created a culture at Shaw that will prevent them from going back down.
Washington Post editors
| September 28, 2009; 6:00 AM ET
Categories: Jay on the Web, Metro Monday, dc schools
Save & Share: Previous: Hidden Depths of Michelle Rhee
Next: 10 Ways to Pick the Right School
Posted by: mfalcon | September 28, 2009 7:56 AM | Report abuse
Posted by: dianalaufenberg | September 28, 2009 8:29 AM | Report abuse
Posted by: Jay Mathews | September 28, 2009 1:18 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: mfalcon | September 28, 2009 9:27 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: Title1SoccerMom | September 29, 2009 12:02 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: simplewords999 | September 30, 2009 5:07 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: Jay Mathews | October 1, 2009 6:28 PM | Report abuse
The comments to this entry are closed.