Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Training teachers like ice skaters

Here is how Mike Goldstein, one of the most creative people in public education, describes the latest trend in the recruitment and training of young teachers for impoverished schools by Teach For America and other hard-working organizations:

"The focus thus far has been on selection of workaholics who have certain traits, and stripping off the ed school stuff perceived by some as counterproductive."

That's pretty accurate. Goldstein knows the environment. Ten years ago he founded the MATCH Charter Public High School in Boston, one of the nation's most successful inner-city charters. Like other charter school leaders and Teach For America supervisors, he has been working a long time with the almost frighteningly motivated young people who have jumped into those programs right out of Yale, Georgetown, Stanford, the University of Texas and other selective colleges and universities.

He says he has come up with a different way to get those kids ready for their jobs. The teacher trainees he works with are members of the MATCH Corps, recent college grads who provide the all-day tutoring that is one of the secrets of the MATCH school's success.

What is happening at Teacher For America and similar programs is mostly on-the-job training. Bright but inexperienced teachers are tossed into classrooms full of students below grade level. They are given as many tips and pep talks as there is time for, but mostly let them figure it out.

Goldstein wondered if there were some way to more effectively teach them what they need to do in those classrooms before they start. He saw the worth of what we might call the ice skater model, in honor of the winter Olympics.

People trained in very complex skills, such ice skaters, chess players, violinists, quarterbacks or surgeons, often do something called deliberate practice.

"A kid who practices 10 hours playing sloppy pick up basketball with his friends might develop less than a kid who has a focused two hours of practice with measurable, highly specific, small chunk feedback," Goldstein told me in a long email. "Similarly, a rookie teacher who simply student teaches or acts as an assistant teacher might simply be repeating the WRONG moves.

"Deliberate practice means (1) specific & technique-oriented, (2) high-repetition, and (3) paired with immediate feedback which includes telling the novice what to do.

"That's what we do: 'Do X. Now you say it, right in front of me. Tone needs to be firm: do it again.' High dosage feedback, after every day of student teaching. And feedback that is directive. Don't say 'Here's 5 different ways you could try.' Cut through that.

"This is labor-intensive but, we think, has big payoff."

On the MATCH Web site is an interview with one of the current MATCH Corps members and participants in the teacher training, Elizabeth Pace, Brown University class of '09. She describes what she and other corps members do at the school each day BEFORE they practice their teaching moves. Teacher training is usually done on Friday and Saturday, and in the summer. Keep in mind that they live at the school on a floor of the building that reminds me of my basic training barracks in 1967.

"On a morning when I do not have breakfast duty, I wake up at 7 a.m. and am at my computer by 7:30 checking email and prepping for tutorials. The first bell rings at 7:45 and students can enter the building for breakfast and homework turn-in. When first period begins at 8:30, I head downstairs to tutor a repeating freshman in a one-on-one tutorial in Algebra I. From 9:30-10:30, I tutor three sophomores in English. After that, I have a prep period to grade papers and gather materials for my next periods.

"After a 30-minute lunch, I have a Readers Workshop group from 12-1 p.m. where I lead 5 freshmen in an hour of independent reading and reading skill-development. From 1-2 p.m. I have another hour to grade and work on my Administrative Assistant job. Corps members have 'secondary duties' of being either Teaching Assistants (TAs) or Administrative Assistants (AAs) and I am the AA for School Logistics. I am in charge of planning the student, room, teacher and tutor distributions for any classes and events that differ from the normal schedule.

"From 2-3 p.m. I work with my sophomore girls again – this time in Geometry and Algebra II. From 3-4 p.m., I am back with my freshman student to study Fiction and Non-Fiction. At 4 p.m., I have my last prep period of the day, where I often work with my sophomores again in study hall or plan/distribute logistics information.

"From 5:15-7:15, I tutor another freshman student one-on-one in the Student Intervention Program (SIP). Students in SIP are failing one or more classes and are required to stay after school for extra help."

Goldstein believes those daily efforts to strengthen the academic work of easily discouraged teenagers is key to the success of the new teacher training method. "We fundamentally reject the notion that by reading lots of psychology articles, a teacher can develop a meaningful, usable sense of how kids learn," he said. "Instead, to develop an intuitive sense for how kids learn, we think 1,000 hours of sitting next to kids and tutoring, 1-on-1 or 1-on-2, is the way to go. This frees you from classroom management issues, and gets right to the heart of actual learning and learning breakdowns."

Those MATCH Corps members are also getting experience in building relationships with students and parents, using methods that Goldstein and his team have developed through trial and error over the years. Goldstein said much of the teacher training method stems from the work of the school's founding principal, Charlie Sposato, who died of cancer in 2007.

The MATCH teacher trainees also practice mastery of classroom management. Lack of that skill explains most failures of young teachers. "We have very specific moves," Goldstein said. "You can't even begin student teaching until you pass The Gateway -- simulated classroom environments with real kids executing coordinated small potatoes misbehaviors."

Goldstein is not saying he has created the New Super Ed School that will sweep away the big university campuses that teach John Dewey, but not how to teach. "We're just claiming that we're trying something new," he said. "The MATCH concept in 1999 was originally a media-themed school, and that is totally gone, replaced by tutoring and AP For All. So I'm not dumb enough to think that what I'm telling you above won't change radically in the coming years, if we keep our eye on the results."

He is sending graduates of this experiment out to teaching jobs in charter schools of the No Excuses variety, places that pride themselves on gains in student achievement. Amy D'Angelo, principal of an Achievement First school in Brooklyn, called one MATCH trained teacher, Ellie Brown, "the best first year teacher I've ever seen." Jason Singer, who runs a high school that is part of the KIPP charter network in California, said another MATCH product, Laura Einhorn, was "light years beyond a traditional first year teacher," according to Goldstein.

Goldstein also asked visiting experts--all of them experienced principals--to evaluate new teachers in charter schools without telling them which ones had come from MATCH. His sample is very small, he said, but his graduates scored 25 percent higher on average than the non-MATCH teachers.

I think the effort of a new generation of educators to improve the lives of our poorest kids is the story of the last decade and of this new one. They all fail in some way, and then look for ways to keep that from happening to next year's crop of novices. That is the heart of Goldstein's method. It is raw, but worth a look.

Goldstein is not kind to traditional education schools, and neither am I, but I hope some of their professors apply their analytical skills to what Goldstein and Co. are doing, and see if they might learn something.

Read Jay's blog every day at http://washingtonpost.com/class-struggle.

Follow all the Post's Education coverage on Twitter, Facebook and our Education web page, http://washingtonpost.com/education.




By Jay Mathews  | February 26, 2010; 5:30 AM ET
Categories:  Trends  | Tags:  MATCH charter school, Mike Goldstein, deliberate practice, having new teachers repeat methods frequently while being watched, training new teachers  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Should 9th graders take AP?
Next: D.C. teacher evaluations look better

Comments

Teaching is hard. First year especially. Makes sense to have tough training year to prep for tough "real" year.

Posted by: gosixers | February 26, 2010 7:42 AM | Report abuse

I am a teacher, and believe me anything that gets teacher training out of the hands of the education professors is a good idea.

Posted by: pittypatt | February 26, 2010 9:41 AM | Report abuse

Do 12 hour days seem reasonable to people? That's 12 hours scheduled. I would bet these teachers still spend more time outside of that planning and reflecting. That's seems excessive.

Posted by: Jenny04 | February 26, 2010 9:51 AM | Report abuse

Since there's nothing even remotely revolutionary about MATCH's ideas the only reason they appear so astonishing is in the context of a teacher-training system dominated by a customer that's indifferent to teaching skill.

Posted by: allenm1 | February 26, 2010 10:11 AM | Report abuse

As Deborah Stipek observed about TFA, it's a priesthood, not teaching. That's a ridiculously long day.

However, I got into teaching through tutoring and private instruction, and without question, working with students one on one or in small groups gives you a much better idea of what is involved in teaching, where the misconceptions are, and so on. I am considered extremely strong in assessment and curriculum development because I know what to look for.

Posted by: Cal_Lanier | February 26, 2010 12:38 PM | Report abuse

These are interesting ideas. I do agree that reading psychology articles doesn't have much to do with classroom practice, except perhaps that it is valuable to know about the developmental stages of an age group.

Posted by: celestun100 | February 26, 2010 2:30 PM | Report abuse

The hours described are for MATCH Corps tutors. Only some of them do this teacher training. Their actual teacher schedules begin when they finish and move on to their own classroom in other schools. Only a handful are hired to teach at MATCH.

Posted by: rosstrudeau | February 26, 2010 7:19 PM | Report abuse

I don't know whether to laugh or cry. Could you imagine asking this same question for lawyers, doctors, or engineers? Teaching has become a second rate profession where anyone who has an inkling of interest (and an ounce of naivete) are thrown into a highly complex process which is considered by most of America to be something anyone can do. Try looking at the statistics of how long Teach for America participants actually staty in the field. In 1980s.. it was called A Nation at Risk... today.. it's called a Nation who Failed.

Posted by: lk11 | February 27, 2010 8:49 AM | Report abuse

I must have fouled up trying to make the same point as lk11. I started reading the post as if it was The Onion. I really wasn't sure if it was satire. Then I realized that the guy is serious!

Try the Goldstein method in a cluster of high-poverty schools and watch the burnout. Once you use up your supply of the most motivated students and teachers, unless you DRAMATICALLY increase resources, including alternative services for the most troubled kids that charters don't have to keep, you will be back with most teachers (many of whom who are as good or great as Goldstein's) who face challenges that dwarf those at Match. We in the neighborhood schools are basically trying to drink from a firehose. We've got plenty of teachers who demonstrate equal skill in coaching our metaphorical Olympian prospects, but we can only apply a fraction of our energies to them.

The saddest thing is that our kids playing pickup games deserve the same care as the Olympic skaters. I'd have no quarrel with Goldstain if he stuck to his task of providing great instruction for the kids who he can help, and stopped berating the rest of us.

Posted by: johnt4853 | February 27, 2010 9:27 AM | Report abuse

By the way, it might be true that "The MATCH teacher trainees also practice mastery of classroom management. Lack of that skill explains most failures of YOUNG teachers," emphasis mine.

But classroom management deficits are only a small factor in explaining the anarchy of NEIGHBORHOOD schools. But its cheaper and easier to just blame teachers, proclaim "No Excuses" and starve the alternative schools that are essential. By the way, the Gates just issued three reports that confirm the need for alternative schools if you want to turnaround systems as opposed to individual schools.

Posted by: johnt4853 | February 27, 2010 9:33 AM | Report abuse

Okay - so what about the people who want to become teachers and have normal lives? This method of training is still only targeting the super motivated, give-up-everything-for-my-career types. Can we ever get away from the idea that the only way to fix education is to make all of our teachers superhuman?

Another way, that might be more sustainable, would be to invest more resources in education that would let these wonderful people work in an intense, targeted manner, but not in a way that burns them out in the first few years.

Posted by: TheReflectiveEducator | February 28, 2010 12:06 PM | Report abuse

Your recent articles are so ridiculous, they are laughable. Are you serious? I dare you to go spend one day in an inner city high school, unannounced, and work as a substituted English teacher. I guarantee you won't last a day. I'm so tired of those who've never taught in a classroom telling us what to do. Give me a break, would you make the same comment about any other profession - say journalism, I doubt it. But then your profession is something to be held in high esteem right, unlike teaching?

Posted by: mia_101mail | February 28, 2010 12:25 PM | Report abuse

Tremendous thanks to all the commentators above.
The politicians and other know-nothings have hijacked education in America. Teachers, the only ones who really know what works and doesn't work, are never consulted, much less quoted, at a national level. Scapegoating is the most popular "rationale" of directing anger and "change".
Please keep watching and writing out there. Maybe some of this will actually get through to Jay and others in influential positions.

Posted by: 1bnthrdntht | March 1, 2010 12:11 PM | Report abuse

One of the dangers in our profession is applying one strategy to everything, in hopes of finding a silver bullet. There is no such thing because kids are different from month to month and year to year. This approach, while certainly different and demanding, could and does work. However, applying it becomes tricky. It is certainly not for all, but for some kids [and teachers] it can be the key that unlocks a whole life. An intense investment of time and energy on our part could lead to decades of success for a kid.

As for the comment about asking doctors and lawyers to do this, recall that they also have malpractice with which to deal.

If you adopt this approach of ice skating, who would you classify as "skating on thin ice"??

Posted by: Justlistening | March 2, 2010 12:50 PM | Report abuse

I'm for whatever works. WHen you have schools that only 7% of the 11th graders can pass the math test, then you try anything. Many different flacors of ice cream are available and students need to find the most comfortable situation to learn teaching techniques. If this works for them, great!

Posted by: goodjuli20031 | March 2, 2010 3:57 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 

© 2010 The Washington Post Company