Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Researchers: Williamsburg colonists buried pets

A finding from the College of William and Mary may change attitudes about how colonists treated their pets.

Laboratory analysis at the college has found that some bone fragments recovered this summer in unmarked graves on campus belonged not to humans but to dogs, buried two centuries ago.

The finding is apparently unprecedented. Colonists were not previously known to have buried their pets in formal graves.

graves_set1.jpg

Here is a picture of the Colonial-era dog graves.

"I don't know of any instance of the formal, intentional interment of animals in the 18th Century, either dogs or cats," said Joanne Bowen, a research professor in the William and Mary anthropology department, as quoted in a release.

The pair of graves, discovered in July amid campus construction, were "carefully excavated rectangular shafts," befitting a human burial site, the release states. The graves were aligned to the east and west, consistent with Christian burial rites of that era.

"When we first identified the sites, we treated the remains as human because they were buried like people," said Joe Jones, director of the school's Center for Archeological Research, in the statement.

The actual bone fragments were tiny -- hence the confusion over what sort of bones they were. The graves were excavated and the bones analyzed. The graves were found to date from the late 17th to mid-18th centuries.

Researchers have believed that colonists "didn't think of their dogs and cats in the same way we do now," Bowen said. Formal pet graves don't appear until the 19th century.

(Interesting aside: Apparently some prehistoric Native Americans did bury dogs with a measure of ceremony. But those graves are oval and not aligned east to west.)

Jones said that "despite a long history" of research and scholarship on the topic, "we know of no documented or undocumented examples of dog burial features like this" on Colonial sites.

Until now.

Follow College Inc. on Twitter.

By Daniel de Vise  |  September 3, 2010; 11:13 AM ET
Categories:  Research  | Tags: William Mary dog graves, Williamsburg dog graves, colonial dog graves, colonialists buried dogs in graves, dogs found in graves  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Should 'Sex Week' worry college leaders?
Next: Gallaudet students question response time in death

No comments have been posted to this entry.

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company