Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

10 colleges where you'd best apply early

U.S. News & World Report has released a list of the 10 universities where early application yields the greatest advantage.

Early decision -- and its kinder, gentler counterpart, early action -- is one of the most controversial pieces of an increasingly complex admissions puzzle.

Colleges that offer early decision typically promise a better chance of admission to students who promise to attend if admitted. It's supposed to be ideal for a student with a dream school, a clear first choice. The downside, of course, is that once admitted, the student cannot change her or his mind.

Students game the system by applying early decision to a longshot school that is not necessarily a first choice. That sort of gambit is frowned upon by counselors and best captured by the paradoxical statement, 'I know I want to apply early decision, I just don't know where.'

Colleges game the system by accepting ever greater numbers of students through the early decision process. Doing this, they boost their yield, or the share of admitted students who choose to attend. That's important, because yield is one of the most closely watched metrics in college admissions.

But those colleges pay a price. The very top students aren't likely to apply early decision anywhere. They want their options open. So, a university such as Johns Hopkins or Penn, which is likely to draw the very top students in the nation through regular admissions, probably will lose some of those prospects in early decision, because those students want a shot at Harvard and Yale.

Early decision is criticized as unfairly narrowing students' options. It's said to favor the well-prepared and the rich, students who can afford to circumvent the usual process of shopping around among competing schools. But students generally say they like the early decision option.

A variant, early action, is essentially the same program without the promise to attend. It still helps the student, who gets an early reply from the college, and it helps the college assemble some of the freshman class ahead of schedule. Georgetown and Howard universities use early action.

The U.S. News list comes from its newly released Ultimate College Guide for 2011. Most of the schools represented, including Johns Hopkins and College of William and Mary, seem to use early decision rather than early action.

The first set of numbers in the chart is the "early" admit rate at the college. The second column is the "regular" rate. The last column is the difference.

For students applying early at Hopkins, the admit rate improves from one quarter to half. At William and Mary, from 32 percent to 53 percent. At Penn, from 15 percent to 31 percent.

Here is the chart.

Follow College Inc. on Twitter.

By Daniel de Vise  | October 6, 2010; 2:00 PM ET
Categories:  Access, Admissions, Finance, Rankings  | Tags:  Early Action, Early Admission, Early Decision, U.S. News, college admissions, college rankings  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: 'Public Talks' coming to a college library near you
Next: Top doctoral programs in English

Comments

This column and the accompanying chart are helpful, but are somewhat misleading with regard to at least two of the colleges that have high EA acceptance rates. Notre Dame and BC both actively discourage students from applying under their Early Action programs if the students' grades and test scores are not higher than the averages for the universities' admitted students. If one believes that Notre Dame and BC are successful in attracting a stronger EA applicant pool than regular applicant pool (and I do believe that), the higher EA admission percentages are more of a reflection of the stronger applicants than they are of an advantage of extra consideration applied to the EA students by the admissions offices.

Posted by: CollegeCounselorinaCalifHS | October 10, 2010 1:21 AM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company