The Morning Line: No If's, And's or Buttocks
Some weeks back, 'Riffs wrote about the dance that goes on among cartoonists, syndicate editors and newspaper editors over "iffy" language. By that, we mean language that is far tamer than George Carlin's "Seven Words," but saltier than what you might hear on, oh, "Dora the Explorer."
These are the words that some dictionaries might claim are "mildly vulgar," but hardly profane. And these are the words that seem to cause the most hand-wringing among "family newspaper" editors and urge-to-be-"edgy" cartoonists.
Of those, two words in particular seem to get into the most trouble on the funnypages:
To some ears, "sucks" is the absolute mildest of terms--almost laughable, even. But to others, the word merits pulling a day's comic strip. Similarly, "butt" seems tame to some, crass to others. (I've witnessed a newspaper editor spending thousands of dollars to recall papers with a headline containing the word "butt.")
In today's very funny "Pearls Before Swine," Stephan Pastis seems to have hit on the perfect, cheeky way around the "butt" hubbub: Use the quasi-clinical term "buttocks" -- and in the most amusing of ways. I laughed aloud before I'd even hit the second panel.
This is definitely one solution to language sensitivities that does not suck.
ELSEWHERE 'ROUND THE PAGE...
Perhaps it's just me, but I can't read today's "Baldo" without thinking of the well-known Christopher Walken soliloquy in "Pulp Fiction." Not that I'm proud of this fact. But it did prompt me to re-watch a clip* of "The Watch."
(*Note to young readers and their parental-type unites: There is some salty language in this clip that makes "sucks" and "butt" pale in comparison.)
| January 1, 2009; 6:00 AM ET
Categories: The Morning Line
Save & Share: Previous: The E-Mailbag: Guess the Fate of Sally Forth
Next: The Riff: Younger Spidey--and the Amazing Mark Trail?
Posted by: HallieRoseC | January 1, 2009 11:15 PM | Report abuse
The comments to this entry are closed.