Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
E-mail Michael  |  On Facebook: Comic Riffs  |  On Twitter: Comic Riffs  |  RSS Feeds RSS Feed
Posted at 11:30 AM ET, 03/ 3/2009

The Poll: Cats or Dogs -- Which Make a Better Comics Pet?

By Michael Cavna

Whenever I get to talking about Garfield or Bucky or Snoopy or Satchel with readers and cartoonists, this subject inevitably rears its head:

In cartoon form, who rules: Dogs or cats?

Get both breeds of pet fans together, discussing such issues, and it can quickly become heated. But here's my thinking: I would argue that dogs make the better physical comedian, while the internal worlds of "conniving" cats makes for great interior monologues. (I grew up with dogs and cats, so I consider myself nonpartisan in this "in heat" debate.)

So I put the question to you, 'Riffs readers. Sure, canines and felines make for great natural antagonists, but when you get right down to it -- which are superior in funnies form: Cats or dogs?

(*And whether Marmaduke helps or hurts the case for pooches, this is for you -- the greater 'Riffs jury -- to decide.)


By Michael Cavna  | March 3, 2009; 11:30 AM ET
Categories:  The E-Mailbag  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Taste Test: What Do You Think of These Brand-New Animations?
Next: Have You Got an Obama Joke? Then Enter It HERE...

Comments

Hey! -- What about Woodstock the bird?

Posted by: greggwiggins | March 3, 2009 11:48 AM | Report abuse

Tigers, hands down.

Posted by: CentreOfNowhere1 | March 4, 2009 7:54 AM | Report abuse

Peakaboo, of course. Then again, there is Heathcliff....
at any rate, I am the servent of a Manx, what can I say but Cats are better.

Posted by: ZeldaJane | March 4, 2009 10:44 AM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company