Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
E-mail Michael  |  On Facebook: Comic Riffs  |  On Twitter: Comic Riffs  |  RSS Feeds RSS Feed
Posted at 12:00 PM ET, 06/ 1/2009

Huffington Post and Sotomayor Draw Fire

By Michael Cavna

It's not just the content of political cartoons that can generate heated debate. These days, even their very existence can result in someone suddenly writing in a huff, if not a Huffington.

Back in April, a HuffPost contributor named JASON NOTTE wrote a "list" piece headlined: "Ten Features That Are Dying With Your Newspaper." The thrust of the list was to identify things that the newspaper, when it "finally does breathe its last," will take to the grave. Notte's list included editorial cartoons -- "those witty, insightful, stinging illustrated summaries of current events" -- as well as "The Family Circus."

Not so fast -- and not so arrogant, cartoonist DARYL CAGLE responded Friday, posting on his cartoon blog. Cagle -- who calls Notte's piece "arrogant crap" -- counters that "editorial cartoons have never been more popular," thanks in part to the Web.

Cagle also contends: "We are not seeing a decline in the number of active editorial cartoonists with the losses of full time jobs; just the opposite is happening, there are more now, plugging away as freelancers, scraping a living together from paying and non-paying clients."

There's little argument that full-time newspaper staff positions for political cartoonists will continue to diminish. And it's hard not to acknowledge that political cartoons will populate the Web ever more heavily. There are too many cartoonists who have "too many" opinions for that to ever occur. The key question will simply be: Will anyone not named Mike Luckovich or Michael Ramirez or David Horsey (or a handful of others) make a living by working for a primary media employer?

Political cartoons, of course, will remain as relevant as their best practitioners. And in that vein, we acknowledge recent cartoons addressing the Sotomayor nomination and ask you: Which of these political cartoons is most effective at being provocative?

The polls are now open.






By Michael Cavna  | June 1, 2009; 12:00 PM ET
Categories:  The Political Cartoon  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Does 'Fatal Attraction' Plot Pass the Rabbit Test?
Next: The Buzz Is Back: 'Toy Story 3' Trailer Toys With Our Expectations


If Jason Notte was correct in predicting on HufPost that the demise of newspapers would in fact take "Family Circus" to the grave, then it would almost be worth the loss. However, we all know that "Family Circus" would continue to live on long after its newspaper hosts have died, just like some mutant atomic cockroach after a nuclear holocaust. Of course, one might argue that in many respects "Family Circus" is rather like some mutant atomic cockroach right **now**, but that is a subject for another blog.

Posted by: seismic-2 | June 1, 2009 2:05 PM | Report abuse

>> seismic-2:

hear, hear! -- you've hit on a subject that is for *precisely* this blog. by all means -- we encourage and embrace such apocalycomic metaphors.

(why, as we ourselves once blogged: "Long after many strips have shriveled on the print-newspaper vine, "Beetle Bailey" and "Family Circus" will continue to thrive like nuclear cockroaches. Not that I am likening the strips themselves to cockroaches. Jeffy has far beadier eyes.")


Posted by: cavnam | June 1, 2009 4:27 PM | Report abuse

Provocative? Siers. Also good art (five cents, from Ruthie). But I'd pick any of the others over Siers, for content or a good gag (alright, Kelley was predictable).

Posted by: filfeit | June 2, 2009 7:52 AM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company