The Crime Scene - To Serve and Inform

Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Posted at 4:23 PM ET, 03/ 4/2011

Pershing Park lawyers fees top $2M

By Del Quentin Wilber

The D.C. government has shelled out more than $2 million in attorneys fees to lawyers representing former top D.C. police officials involved in a long-running lawsuit accusing them of ordering unfounded arrests of hundreds of protesters in 2002.

The tally came in a filing late Thursday in the District's federal court by lawyers representing four bystanders who were among those swept up and arrested in Pershing Park during demonstrations against the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. "The District continues to seek to drive up costs and prolong litigation in this case," lawyers Daniel C. Schwartz and Jonathan Turley wrote in court papers, adding the city has "spared no expense" in defending former Chief Charles H. Ramsey and Assistant Police Chief Peter Newsham.

The government has already settled a class-action suit brought by the bulk of the nearly 400 protesters arrested in Pershing Park on Sept. 27, 2002, for $8.25 million -- just one of several expensive settlements reached by the District over bad arrests over the years. But the city was not able to settle with four bystanders arrested by D.C. police in Pershing Park and that legal fight has turned into an investigation led by a federal judge into why D.C. police either destroyed, lost or edited key pieces of evidence, including radio recordings, command logs and videotapes.

Last year, a federal judge heard testimony from 21 witnesses, including Ramsey and other top police officials, to account for the loss of that evidence. The investigation by U.S. Magistrate Judge John F. Facciola is on-going.

A spokesman for the Attorney General's office did not return a call seeking comment.

By Del Quentin Wilber  | March 4, 2011; 4:23 PM ET
Categories:  Del Quentin Wilber, From the Courthouse, The District  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Guilty plea in $14M bank fraud case
Next: Home search in missing woman case


That this is "just one of several expensive settlements" makes me blanche. Where do I, as a citizen and on the hook for all the settlements and litigation, go to find out exactly who is suing me, why and for how much? Is transparancy too much to ask?

Posted by: mac4700 | March 5, 2011 1:04 AM | Report abuse

Hopefully the city would send the bill to Chuck Ramsey since he disregarded the advice of more experienced people.

Posted by: priveye | March 5, 2011 5:48 AM | Report abuse

City is getting raped by scumbag lawyers because a few out of town rabble rousers were detained a few hours.

Posted by: PepperDr | March 5, 2011 9:20 AM | Report abuse

Past time for another D.C. receivership.

Posted by: slipuvalad | March 5, 2011 1:12 PM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.

characters remaining

RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company