No dancing at Jefferson Memorial, judge rules
A federal judge has thrown out a lawsuit that alleged the National Park Service violated the rights of a District woman who was arrested in 2008 for dancing with 17 others at the Jefferson Memorial.
U.S. District Judge John D. Bates ruled in a 26-page opinion on Monday that the interior of the memorial is not a public forum where people may dance, even if they are silently boogying to music on headphones.
“The purpose of the memorial is to publicize Thomas Jefferson’s legacy, so that critics and supporters alike may contemplate his place in history,” Bates wrote. “The Park Service prohibits all demonstrations in the interior of the memorial, in order to maintain ‘an atmosphere of calm, tranquillity, and reverence.'”
“Prohibiting demonstrations is a reasonable means of ensuring a tranquil and contemplative mood at the Jefferson Memorial,” the judge added.
The suit stems from a dance by Mary B. Oberwetter and her friends inside the memorial at 11:55 p.m. on April 12, 2008, the eve of Jefferson’s birthday.
Oberwetter and the others were listening to music on headphones and engaging in expressive dancing to honor “the individualist spirit for which Jefferson is known,” Oberwetter’s attorney, Alan Gura, wrote in court papers.
That’s when U.S. Park Police Officer Kenneth Hilliard showed up and told them to stop. When Oberwetter refused and asked why he was demanding they stop their jigs, Hilliard arrested and charged Oberwetter with demonstrating without a permit and interfering with an agency function. The charges were eventually dropped.
Oberwetter then sued the Park Service in March 2009, alleging that it violated her rights to free expression and asked Bates to block the government from taking such steps in the future. She also sought monetary damages against Hilliard and the Park Service for violating her rights. The Justice Department argued for the Park Service that the government had the right to regulate activities inside the memorial because it is seeking to maintain a quiet atmosphere.
“The Memorial is, has long been, and is intended to be a place of calm, tranquillity, and reverence—a place where visitors can go to celebrate and honor Jefferson and enjoy and contemplate the Memorial itself without the distraction of public demonstrations and other expressive activities,” Justice Department lawyers wrote in court papers. “The Memorial is akin to a temple or a shrine (both in terms of its purpose and its physical characteristics), not a place of public expression.”
Read the Opinion jeffersondecision.pdf.
No word yet from Gura on whether he plans to appeal.
January 26, 2010; 12:15 PM ET
Categories: Del Quentin Wilber , From the Courthouse , The District
Save & Share: Previous: Authorities search Va. landfill for missing toddler
Next: Skeletal remains found in Albemarle County
Posted by: jckdoors | January 26, 2010 2:08 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: dcdoug | January 26, 2010 4:51 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: uncivil | January 26, 2010 5:55 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: Fathertimema | January 26, 2010 7:21 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: icebluekoolaid1 | January 26, 2010 7:51 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: pennv | January 27, 2010 7:07 AM | Report abuse
The comments to this entry are closed.