Fri. decision on 'shotgun stalker' release

The judge overseeing the request for a one-time 12-hour release from St. Elizabeths Hospital from the District's so-called "shotgun stalker" said Tuesday that he expects to issue a decision by Friday.
James E. Swann Jr., 46, was declared not guilty by reason of insanity for the 1993 shooting spree that left four people dead and five injured. He has requested a hearing so he can be allowed out of the District's psychiatric hospital to spend his Feb. 26 birthday with his father.
D. C. Superior Court Judge Fred B. Ugast listened to closing arguments from attorneys on both sides Tuesday after two days of testimony last week regarding the conditional release.
Swann's attorneys argued that their client no longer suffered from past delusional problems that included paranoid schizophrenia exacerbated by alcoholism.
Kimberly Clark of the District's Public Defender Service said Swann had improved largely due to medication and treatment and was no longer "a danger to himself or others."
Prosecutors and hospital officials argued it was too soon for Swann to be allowed off the hospital grounds unchaperoned by hospital staff and said Swann still showed signs of mental illness.
At the time of Swann's arrest following the shootings, Swann told a psychiatrist in a videotaped interview that he heard voices that commanded him to randomly shoot people in the Columbia Heights and Mount Pleasant neighborhoods to avenge the murder of Malcolm X.
By
Keith L. Alexander
| February 22, 2011; 3:20 PM ET
Categories:
From the Courthouse, Homicide, Keith L. Alexander, The District, Updates
Save & Share:
Previous: Armored car heists may be related
Next: Fairfax man dies in alleged drunk driving crash
"exasperated"
exacerbated maybe?
Posted by: johnb5 | February 22, 2011 4:20 PM | Report abuse











We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.
User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.