The Crime Scene - To Serve and Inform

Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Judge approves protest settlement

Washington Post Editors

A federal judge gave final approval Wednesday to a settlement in which the D.C. government will pay $8.25 million to almost 400 protesters and bystanders swept up in a mass arrest at Pershing Park during a September 2002 demonstration against the World Bank.

Together with a $13.7 million approved in April for another 700 people arrested by D.C. police using similar tactics in April 2000, the $22 million paid by the D.C. government is the largest protest settlement ever paid out by a municipal government in the United States, according to the Partnership for Civil Justice Fund, which brought the cases.

U.S. District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan of the District said the "historic settlement" would help protect "future generations of protesters" and their "First Amendment rights in the way, I am sure, the Founders intended."

"We have changed the landscape for protestors in the nation's capital and for the better," said Mara Verheyden-Hilliard, co-founder of the partnership. "The results of these constitutional rights lawsuits also send a message nationwide, that there will be a significant price to pay for violations of fundamental free speech rights."

"We're glad the case is resolved," George Valentine, a lawyer for the city, said in brief remarks before the judge acted. "We fully support the settlement and look forward to the court giving it final approval."

The agreement settles complaints that D.C. police violated the constitutional rights of 386 people arrested without warning in Pershing Park on Sept. 27, 2002, leaving some hog-tied wrist to ankle and detained as long as 24 hours. Former D.C. police chief Charles H. Ramsey eventually apologized, and the Metropolitan Police Department abandoned so-called "trap and detain" tactics -- adopted in a period that saw the controversial 2000 presidential election; 9/11 terrorist attacks; and anti-globalization and anti-Iraq war protests --in which officers surrounded and arrested large groups of people close to demonstrations.

The D.C. Council passed new limits on police powers in 2005, and imposed requirements for police training and retention of dispatch, video and command center data and materials collected in demonstration cases to prevent destruction of evidence.

A court-ordered investigation into the District's loss of records -- including a key log of police actions and radio dispatch recordings -- is ongoing under threat of possible referral for criminal investigation.

Under terms reached last December pending final court approval, about 85 percent of 355 class action members have agreed to participate and will split $4.8 million (receiving about $16,000 each); 17 named plaintiffs receive $850,000, or $50,000 each; and lawyers will get $2.5 million, all from taxpayers. The District government has also paid more than $1 million for its own legal costs. The agreement releases all D.C. officials, including Ramsey and assistant chief Peter J. Newsham from any personal liability.

The city also agreed to expunge arrest records of those detained. The D.C.
Council has prohibited police arrests for "parading" or demonstrating without a permit, set a four-hour standard for release of protest-related arrests and requires written disclosure in such cases of arrestees' rights to speedy release.

-- Spencer S. Hsu

By Washington Post Editors  | September 22, 2010; 4:00 PM ET
Categories:  From the Courthouse, Spencer S. Hsu, The District  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Man held in Md. trooper slaying
Next: AU employee sentenced for theft

Comments

so approximately $20,000 per protestor?

good work, government..

I'm sure all the union cops will keep their jobs as well..

So the taxpayer will be penalized.

Rome is falling.

Posted by: ObamaisFraud | September 22, 2010 5:06 PM | Report abuse

Of course MPD shouldn't deliberately violate people's Constitutional rights. But why does MPD have to get into this mess at all? Why should the District leave itself open to such suits?

If there's a protest in DC against something the federal government is doing, or something an international entity (like the World Bank) is doing, why can't we make the feds provide the security and law enforcement? Why should we be left holding the bag?

Posted by: nan_lynn | September 22, 2010 5:33 PM | Report abuse

The D.C. Council has prohibited police arrests for "parading" or demonstrating without a permit, set a four-hour standard for release of protest-related arrests and requires written disclosure in such cases of arrestees' rights to speedy release.

Thanks for the double talk DC Council. The police can't arrest demostrators so they are free to disrupt traffic and places of business. What rights do the rest of us who are not protesting have?

Posted by: Jimof1913 | September 22, 2010 6:43 PM | Report abuse

I don't remember this specific protest, but based on the information and the amount of the "settlement" I am going to assume that most, if not all of these class action members.....are white.

Can someone verify that for me?

Posted by: Wdc2424 | September 22, 2010 7:47 PM | Report abuse

I don't remember this specific protest, but based on the information and the amount of the "settlement" I am going to assume that most, if not all of these class action members.....are white.

Can someone verify that for me?

Posted by: Wdc2424 | September 22, 2010 7:48 PM | Report abuse

I don't remember this specific protest, but based on the information and the amount of the "settlement" I am going to assume that most, if not all of these class action members.....are white.

Can someone verify that for me?

Posted by: Wdc2424 | September 22, 2010 7:49 PM | Report abuse

Other than Judge Judy, are there any judges with any common sense? What a crock of sh**!

Posted by: gpl2411 | September 23, 2010 12:43 AM | Report abuse

So the police officials who bungled the job get no punishment, the protesters get rewarded and the taxpayers get screwed. And NO ONE in DC Government suffers any consequences.

Yeah. Same old, same old.

Posted by: atrepos1 | September 23, 2010 12:46 AM | Report abuse

@Wdc2424
_________

What differenece does skin color make? Get back in your time machine, bro.

Posted by: ObamaisFraud | September 23, 2010 10:27 AM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company