The Crime Scene - To Serve and Inform

Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Video: Va. woman to be executed

A Virginia woman convicted of two hired killings is scheduled to die by injection Thursday and become the first woman put to death in Virginia in nearly a century, after the U.S. Supreme Court refused to block her execution.

By Washington Post Editors  | September 22, 2010; 12:04 PM ET
Categories:  Death Penalty, Updates, Virginia  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Woman slain in Greenbelt identified
Next: Charges after Va. school bus crash

Comments

The death penalty is underutilized by a factor of at least one hundred! In this individual's case, she did not 'actually' do the killing, but is being executed. The actual killers were spared and sentenced to life. NONSENSE. They should also be sent to their maker.

IMHO the death penalty should be expanded and applied to cases involving serious intentional bodily injury such as attempted murder, high level financial crimes (say over $500,000) and organized criminal activity detrimental to society (I'm including political payoffs and bribery cases).

Since Gary Gilmore was executed by firing squad in Utah over 30 years ago, just over one thousand executions have been carried out. In the same time frame, over HALF A MILLION murders took place in the USA. Where is the deterrence when it is so sparcely adjudicated and applied even less frequently. MANY murderers die of natural causes before sentence. Why? Because they are so unhealthy? NO! Because they lived 20-30 or more years after the adjudication.

Justice delayed is justice denied.

Execution should be carried out within two years of adjudication - period. This includes ALL appeals, etc. Yes, I know, some innocents will be executed. Human law is not a perfect endeavor. Then again, many innocents will not be killed by repeat offenders out on early release!

Posted by: thereasonableman | September 22, 2010 5:04 PM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company