The Crime Scene - To Serve and Inform

Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

High court rejects death-row appeal

The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday refused to halt the scheduled execution of a Virginia woman who planned the murders of her husband and stepson, meaning that the state is nearly certain to execute its first woman in nearly a century.

Teresa Lewis, 41, admitted she plotted the 2002 killings of her husband, Julian Lewis, and his son, Charles "C.J." Lewis, to collect insurance money. Lewis is set to die by lethal injection Thursday night in Virginia's death chamber.

In a two-paragraph order, the high court said Lewis's application to stay the death sentence was denied. Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor would have granted the stay, but did not offer an explanation.

Lewis gave her conspirators -- she was having an affair with one of them -- $1,200 to buy guns and left the door of her trailer unlocked so they could slip in at night, according to court records. After the shootings, she waited about half an hour to call 911, while her husband slowly bled to death.

Lewis's supporters have argued that she does not deserve to die because she is borderline mentally retarded and was manipulated by a smarter conspirator. It is unfair, they say, that she was sentenced to death while the two triggermen received life sentences.

-- Maria Glod

By Maria Glod  | September 21, 2010; 7:00 PM ET
Categories:  Maria Glod, Virginia  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Dancer: Strip club didn't pay wages
Next: Woman slain in Greenbelt

Comments

What part of no does this #$%$%%^%^ not understand?

Posted by: msdooby1 | September 21, 2010 7:57 PM | Report abuse

"Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor would have granted the stay, but did not offer an explanation."

In other words, these two justices had no reason to stop the execution.

Posted by: ahashburn | September 22, 2010 3:01 AM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company