Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Va. legislator battling State Police prayer rule

A state legislator is renewing his effort to undo an administrative order requiring Virginia State Police chaplains to deliver non-denominational prayers at official events.

Del. Charles W. Carrico, a retired state trooper, claims the 2008 directive from State Police Superintendent W. Steven Flaherty violates the chaplains' constitutional right to free exercise of religion.

"It's not what our forefathers intended," said Carrico, R-Grayson. He said the order continues a trend of catering to "minority religions" while trampling on the rights of the Christian majority.

Carrico introduced legislation in the 2009 General Assembly after five of 17 troopers and state police supervisors serving as chaplains resigned from the voluntary position in protest of the directive. The bill lifting the restriction sailed through the House of Delegates but failed by one vote in a Senate committee.

Carrico already has refiled the measure for the 2010 session, which begins Jan. 13. He said he is hoping for a better result now that senators have had more time to think about the issue.

He also could get a boost from the change in the governor's office. Democratic Gov. Tim Kaine, who had threatened to veto Carrico's bill, will be succeeded by Bob McDonnell, a conservative Republican with close ties to the Rev. Pat Robertson.

“The governor-elect is a strong supporter of religious liberty and the right of religious officials to freely practice their faiths, unimpeded by government,” McDonnell spokesman J. Tucker Martin said. “He is reviewing the directive from that perspective.” He said McDonnell would withhold further comment until after he takes office.

Flaherty issued the order after a federal appeals court upheld a Fredericksburg City Council policy that banned opening council meetings with sectarian prayers. The order applies only to department-sponsored public events, not to private events such as funerals or counseling sessions with troopers or victims.

State police spokeswoman Corinne Geller said the directive applied to only one event in 2009 — the department's annual law enforcement memorial service. She said the department stands by Flaherty's 2008 statement that the state police must “be inclusive and respectful of the varied ethnicities, cultures, and beliefs of our employees, their families, and citizens at-large.”

The American Civil Liberties Union supports the state police position. Kent Willis, executive director of the ACLU in Virginia, said it would be tough for the legislature to reverse the policy because of the appeals court ruling.

“Whatever legislators' personal feelings were, they were wise enough to reject the bill last year because it was unconstitutional,” Willis said.

John Whitehead, president of the Charlottesville-based Rutherford Institute, isn't so sure about that. He said a provision in Carrico's bill requiring a disclaimer on printed programs stating that the invocations or benedictions are not government-sponsored “seems to be a good middle road.”

The Rutherford Institute, a civil liberties group that focuses on First Amendment and religious freedom issues, represented the Fredericksburg city councilman whose legal setback led to the state police order.

Whitehead said the directive fails to recognize that some faiths require prayers to acknowledge a specific deity to be valid. Many Christians, for example, believe they have to invoke Jesus' name.

“If someone's saying a prayer he feels is null and void, you wouldn't want him praying anyway,” Whitehead said.

-- Associated Press

By Washington Post Editors  |  December 29, 2009; 11:06 AM ET
Categories:  Virginia  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Md. attorney dismayed after conviction
Next: Replica guns cause alarm in Loudoun

Comments

The item about the disclaimer statements on programs noting that the invocations are not government-sponsored strikes me as the equivalent of crossing your fingers when promising something. If it's a government-sponsored public event, there is still the presumption that anything taking place during that event has a tacit approval of the sponsoring organization.

Posted by: ribert | December 29, 2009 12:18 PM | Report abuse

Here we go. Another upset Christian in a Christian-majority country. How do you know
what our founding-fathers intended? Go to church and leave those not of your fairy tale thinking alone.

Posted by: jckdoors | December 29, 2009 12:20 PM | Report abuse

The dinosaur riding right-wing wingnuts never give up, do they?

I am so glad I am out of Virginia, where I lived for 20 years, and the petty attitudes and positions of many of the right wing evangelicals. They need to recognize the RIGHTS OF OTHERS and not just their own. Just because you are in the majority DOES NOT MEAN you can trample the minority.

Maybe they could take their dinosaur and go home.

.

Posted by: swanieaz | December 29, 2009 6:37 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company