Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Labor's Diss-Union III

The saga continues.

Turmoil in the Washington Teachers' Union is escalating, with the vice president suing the president of the organization over free-speech issues.

Nathan Saunders, the union's general vice president, filed suit against President George Parker in U.S. District Court on Friday. The dispute, as D.C. Wire reported last month and earlier this month, stems from Parker's new media policy prohibiting anyone except for Parker from making statements on behalf of the 4,200-member union.

"My First Amendment rights to free speech and assembly were violated by George Parker," Saunders told D.C. Wire today, contending that Parker introduced the policy even though the union's executive board rejected it.

"Members have a right to speak -- even when they say things you don't want to hear," he added.

Parker has said that the policy reinforced the union's constitution, which designates the president as the official spokesperson for the union. Other members have said that the constitution, though, does not prohibit other members from speaking out.

Saunders in the suit asserts that Parker introduced the policy after Saunders made public statements opposing legislation requested by Schools Chancellor Michelle Rhee to make hundreds of central office staff "at-will" employees, subjecting them to firing. Saunders says that Parker opposed Saunders's protests because the central office workers were not WTU members.

The suit also asserts that Parker sought to retaliate against Saunders by trying to suspend him and trying to get the school system to withdraw his leave of absence from teaching, which would make him ineligible to run for a union office during the next election in 2010 and unable to return to the classroom.

Parker, while denying all of Saunders's allegations, said, "I don't have any comment [on the suit]. I haven't seen it."

Dion Haynes

By Dion Haynes  |  April 28, 2008; 2:04 PM ET
Categories:  Education  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Truckers Closing In On Capitol
Next: Just Wondering: Are We Numb to the Body Count?


Your article is confusing. Is Saunders asserting a "right" to speak on behalf of the union, or is he asserting that Parker has sought to prevent him from speaking on his own behalf.

It's a big difference, but your reports blurs it entirely. Which is it?

Posted by: Meridian | April 28, 2008 7:37 PM | Report abuse

It seems pretty clear that Saunders believes he has a constitutional right to speak on behalf of the union, which is nonsense.

Posted by: Ted | April 28, 2008 9:08 PM | Report abuse

Here is another union issue. (Remember Barbara Bullock) The union chiefs are fighting each other while teachers spend another year without a contract.

Posted by: Suki | April 28, 2008 9:41 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company