Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Teacher Union Infighting Intensifies

The civil war inside the leadership of the Washington Teachers Union continues to rage.

WTU general vice president Nathan A. Saunders told the D.C. Wire today to "expect civil disobedience" at this evening's union executive board meeting when it takes up president George Parker's plan for membership to hear from him and Chancellor Michelle A. Rhee about contract negotiations in a series of sessions this week.

The board will meet from 6 p.m. to 7 p.m. Rhee is scheduled to speak to the group from 7 p.m. to 8 p.m.

Saunders and Candi Peterson, another board member, say Parker improperly bypassed their group setting up the membership sessions, contending that there should be none until there is a tentative deal between the union and DCPS. The focus of negotiations is Rhee's proposal for a two-tiered salary system in which teachers could earn substantially more if they relinquished some seniority rights and assumed some accountability for test scores. Teachers could also choose to retain seniority and receive smaller raises.

Saunders and other union leaders are said to be opposed to any so-called "pay-for-performance" system. Parker said last week that he also opposes any plan that would link teacher pay solely to student achievement. But Saunders said Parker's private stance has been much closer to Rhee's view.

Saunders, who has a lawsuit pending against Parker for prohibiting him from speaking on behalf of the union, said the membership meetings, due to begin tomorrow, are Parker's attempt to sell a salary plan that only he and Rhee favor.

"This has been a private deal for the most part between George and Rhee," he said.

Board meetings in May and June were canceled, Peterson said, keeping the leadership group out of the loop. And Parker has no business providing Rhee a platform, she added, until the board has had a chance to look at an actual contract.

"The chancellor is not a part of that process," she said.

Bill Turque

By Marcia Davis  |  July 21, 2008; 3:38 PM ET
Categories:  Education  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: CFSA Interim Director Was Sued in Sex Case
Next: Board of Trade Endorses Mara Over Schwartz

Comments

The Pay For Performance System does not work as teachers cannot force students to study at home and thus have a small impact on improving what a student can or cannot do.

The Pay For Performance System is a dirty, backroom device used to chase off teachers.

Posted by: Jonathan Rees | July 21, 2008 4:32 PM | Report abuse

To Mr. Rees above,

Nothing to date has taken our kids from failure to success. Its time for the WTU to bite the bullet and accept the fact that very radical change needs to take place. I witness daily the dozens of lazy, incompetent, overpaid teachers who feel secure in their jobs because they are protected by the union.
Pay for Performance has never been shown not to work.
And besides, those who want the old system of pay based only on seniority will regretably be allowed to keep it.
If Pay for Perfarmance chases off bad teachers then I say, "Bring it on".

Posted by: Devoted DC Teacher | July 22, 2008 12:22 AM | Report abuse

If my son Johnny is against the idea, then I am all for it.

And Johnny, please remember to clean up the basement. It's nice to have you living in my house for the past 30 years, but you really need to start pulling your own weight.

Posted by: Mrs Rees | July 22, 2008 9:24 AM | Report abuse

Alright, teacher fights! Do these take place in a pit, after the Thursdsay night cockfights?

Posted by: johnny | July 23, 2008 7:51 AM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company