Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Cary Silverman: Defender Of Big Tobacco?

Cary Silverman, who is forging a David vs. Goliath race against Ward 2 Council member Jack Evans, was called "a gun industry lobbyist" in a news release last week by Evans's campaign.

The release attacked lawyer Silverman's comments at a debate between he and Evans, held at the Phillips Collection auditorium and sponsored by the Dupont Circle ANC and the Dupont Circle Citizens Association.

At the debate when moderator Davis Kennedy asked about the city's strict gun laws and the Supreme Court ruling against a longtime handgun ban, Silverman replied that he supported businesses having guns, particularly if residents were allowed to have them. For protection, he said.

Turns out Silverman's law firm, Shook Hardy and Bacon, represents gun manufacturer Smith & Wesson, not to mention other big interests, like pharmaceutical giant Merck and tobacco giant Philip Morris.

Silverman said while his law firm represents those clients, he does not. In litigation or lobbying, he said.

But in 2005, he certainly was defending big tobacco.

He co-wrote a 72-page article published in the Kansas Law Review, which questions whether state consumer protection laws go too far.

The article uses lawsuits against tobacco companies as an example, particularly claims filed against the companies regarding the harm of "light" cigarettes after a multi-billion settlement the industry made with states in 1998.

As the article Silverman co-authored noted: "After receiving billions in attorneys' fees as a result of the multi-state settlement of lawsuits aimed at forcing the industry to pay for smoking-related health costs incurred through Medicaid, the legal industry built around such suits needed a new way to attack the unpopular tobacco companies. Class action lawsuits asserting claims under consumer protection statutes provided this new tool."

Silverman said in an interview today that he used the industry as an example but maintained that he has not personally represented the tobacco or gun industries in litigation or as a lobbyist. "It's one of a lot of examples that we use in that article," he said.

D.C. Wire noted that the example before the light cigarettes argument is about suing McDonald's for obesity. That example is titled: "McLawsuits."

Silverman also said that his article, which comes to the defense of large industries often viewed as unpopular, applies to small businesses, too.

Apply it to the District, he said, recalling the infamous pants suit in which a D.C. administrative law judge used the city's consumer protection laws to sue a dry cleaners for $54 million for losing his pants.

Updated at 3:09 p.m.

By Nikita R Stewart  |  August 14, 2008; 12:55 PM ET
Categories:  2008 District Election , D.C. Council , Nikita Stewart  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Small Group of Teachers Protest at Union
Next: Wedding-gate Continues...

Comments

Remember that petition fiasco with all the fraudulent signatures in 2002 involving the Tony Williams petitions? Deeply involved were the Bishop family who are also closely associated with Jack Evans.

Now City Council gossips report that Evans has hired the elder Bishop to do some of his campaign stuff just like in the past. Only this time Bishop will be paid under the table to avoid media attention. In DC nothing ever changes.

Posted by: DC Voter | August 14, 2008 9:06 PM | Report abuse

Thanks for the heads up, DC Voter!

Don't forget the JackPAC scandal when Linda Cropp dropped a dime on him to end his campaign for City Council Chairperson in 2006.

Silverman is a boyscout and Evans went over to the dark side long ago. 17 years is way too long to be inhabiting a council seat--time for a change!

Posted by: LongTimeRez | August 14, 2008 9:31 PM | Report abuse

And shame on you, Nikita, for running that inflammatory, negative (and false) headline about Silverman! He's right about the tobacco lawyers... check out the "American Legacy Foundation" with all of its fat-cat lawyers that made a fortune off the tobacco settlements.

And it's "at a debate between him (not he) and Evans..."

Posted by: LongTimeRez | August 14, 2008 9:53 PM | Report abuse

Jack Evans is in the pockets of the Pharmaceutical industry, many local developers, the DC Hospital Association and a long list of others who we would shiver at knowing of.

Have you ever seen Evans jogging at nights in Georgetown? Well he looks sickly and looks behind his shoulders all the the time. I wonder why?

Posted by: Candy Man | August 14, 2008 10:27 PM | Report abuse

If Cary Silverman supports the right to keep and bear arms, then he is someone who actually follows the US Constitution. I only wish there were more candidates that respect the rule of law.

Posted by: Sturdi | August 15, 2008 8:16 AM | Report abuse

New is not always better. Cary is a conservative same as Jack but in different ways ...the only thing is he is green as a lawn and don't have an idea how government works.

Hold your nose and vote for Jack. Just because you don't like someone that does not mean the other guy is a saint.

Posted by: Anonymous | August 15, 2008 9:03 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company