Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Elections Board Stands By Results

The D.C. Board of Elections and Ethics has been hunkered down in meetings most of the day to review yesterday's results fiasco. But Post staff writer Elissa Silverman, who is on the scene, said board spokesman Dan Murphy briefed reporters moments ago at the board headquarters in Judiciary Square, saying the erroneous tally was caused by a cartridge in an optical scanner machine that read paper ballots in precinct 141. He said the error did not affect any of the outcomes.

Murphy issued this statement: "After conducting a thorough review of all precinct cartridges, the D.C. Board of Elections and Ethics is satisfied that the last unofficial results report released on election night provided an accurate representation of the votes that were cast and counted. The board stands by this report.

"During election night, it is the board's standard practice to generate unofficial results reports and to thereafter conduct an internal audit process to verify the accuracy of the results contained in these reports," Murphy continued. "During this process, it was determined that one defective cartridge caused vote totals to be duplicated into multiple races on the summary report issued by our office. The Board immediately caught and addressed this errror as is reflected in the last unofficial results report issued on election night."

Murphy also said that board Chairman Errol R. Arthur, issued the following statement: "Both the board and Sequoia Voting Systems are currently conducting comprehensive reviews into how the cartridge reading occurred. We will continue to work with them to identify how to prevent this issue in future elections."

By David A Nakamura  |  September 10, 2008; 3:11 PM ET
Categories:  2008 District Election  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Elections Board Musical Chairs
Next: Fenty: All CEOs Have Troubled Departments

Comments

Can anybody tell me how this explains the huge number of write-in candidates? I thought the number of write-ins was more than twice the normal amount. And, if that cartridge was defective, how do we know that the numbers are right now? Have they conducted a physical recount of the ballots?

Posted by: Details Please | September 10, 2008 4:29 PM | Report abuse

Ding Dong! The Witch is dead. Which old Witch? The Wicked Witch! Ding Dong! The Wicked Witch is dead.

Wake up - sleepy head, rub your eyes, get out of bed. Wake up, the Wicked Witch is dead. She's gone where the goblins go, below - below - below.

Yo-ho, let's open up and sing and ring the bells out. Ding Dong' the merry-oh, sing it high, sing it low. Let them know the Wicked Witch is dead!

Good bye and good riddance Ms. Carol Schwartz!

Posted by: Dorothy | September 10, 2008 4:39 PM | Report abuse

Ding Dong! The Witch is dead. Which old Witch? The Wicked Witch! Ding Dong! The Wicked Witch is dead.

Wake up - sleepy head, rub your eyes, get out of bed. Wake up, the Wicked Witch is dead. She's gone where the goblins go,below - below - below.

Yo-ho, let's open up and sing and ring the bells out. Ding Dong' the merry-oh, sing it high, sing it low. Let them know the Wicked Witch is dead!

Good bye and good riddance Ms. Carol Schwartz!

Posted by: Dorothy | September 10, 2008 4:41 PM | Report abuse

New Cool Video. View the Top movie Trailer
[url=http://www.geocities.com/jermaineyork90/][img]http://sharedonline.net/ytub/movie_4_27.gif[/img][/url]

Posted by: coolvideow | September 10, 2008 5:07 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company