Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

D.C. Wire Video: Nader Protests Outside Washington Post

Consumer advocate Ralph Nader complains a lot that he can't get any mainstream media coverage for his presidential campaign this go-round. So today he showed up outside the Washington Post's headquarters at 1150 15th St. to hold a news conference, in which he quoted liberally from Washington Post stories. D.C. Wire showed up to be sure Nader couldn't say he was ignored again.

Not many others showed up. About a dozen Nader staffers, some filming the proceedings, stood on the sidewalk as the candidate read from a prepared script. A few passersby did a double take and one shook Nader's hand and posed with him for a picture. But otherwise, the spoiler from the 2000 election barely caused a stir; one man rolling down the sidewalk on a Segway looked perturbed when he had trouble navigating past the Nader aides.

Nader railed on the District's lack of voting rights in Congress, but also complained that the city is essentially a one-party democracy controlled by Democrats -- both locally in City Hall and, increasingly, on Capitol Hill and, if Obama wins, the White House.

"It's a one-party District," he said. "There is no fear among politicians that they will lose their jobs if they don't shape up."

D.C. Wire pointed out that within the city 90 percent of registered voters are Democrats. Don't they have a right to elect Democrats?

"There's never any opportunity to challenge the Democrats," Nader said. "People here say, why bother? Second, the Democratic Party never delivers on promises."

To make his case, Nader referred to the debate over public financing of the Nationals' baseball stadium and recalled the infamous night three years ago when the D.C. Council voted down the stadium, only to approve it two hours later.

"We were lobbying the City Council against the stadium.at 8 p.m.," he said. "At midnight three votes were changed, including people who campaigned against the stadium and were elected to city council. That's what happens when you're in a one-party state. They don't have to worry about getting defeated."

Mayor Fenty voted against the stadium as a council member and was elected mayor, Nader was reminded.

"Then he supported it," Nader said. (Fenty said that as mayor he would see that the stadium project was completed on time because it was approved by the council.) "He broke his promise," Nader insisted. "Is he going to worry about being defeated? Is there a Republican who's going to beat Adrian Fenty? Of course not. That's what I mean. We don't have a competitive democracy."

By David A Nakamura  |  October 29, 2008; 5:07 PM ET
 
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Catania Conducts Own Budget Analysis
Next: Election Board Moves Walk-In Voting to Handle Crowds

Comments

Is this site really connected to THE Washington Post? Or is this one of those joke site parodies?

You wrote: "D.C. Wire showed up to be sure Nader couldn't say he was ignored again."

Is this reporter from junior high school? Does this reporter have any investigative and research skills? Does this reporter have any critical thinking skills?

Al Gore himself says that Nader wasn't a spoiler.

Does this reporter think that only Florida is constitutionally allowed to pick the president of the United States?

Why aren't the 250,000 Democrats who voted for Bush in 2000 in Florida the spoilers?

Why aren't the other six third party candidates in Florida who also got more than 537 votes the spoilers?

How many state ballots was Mr. Nader on in 2000, D.C. Wire reporter?

Where did this reporter learn his craft?

If you will go research those questions you will be able to write a better news story.

Posted by: crowvision | October 30, 2008 3:29 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company