Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Fenty's Charter Funding Change Criticized

When Mayor Adrian M. Fenty rolled out his proposal last month for a major change in the way public charter schools are funded, his lieutenants said the idea was developed in close consultation with the D.C. Public Charter School Board and others in the charter community.

Board Chairman Tom Nida says that isn't so, and he wants the District to put the plan on hold for a year.

Fenty's 2010 budget would scrap the current per pupil facilities allotment ($3,109) and cut the pool of available facilities money by $24 million (to $66 million). The payment was established in 1999 because, unlike public schools, public charters must lease space or finance the purchase of buildings.

But the allotment has grown more than 400 percent since 1999, and mayoral spokeswoman Mafara Hobson said it has never been adjusted to reflect schools' actual costs. Oversight of the facilities spending has been loose, officials say, and some schools have used the money to cover payroll and other costs. The new proposal would require charters to submit evidence of allowable costs to the board before payment.

Nida and other charter advocates said this will seriously disadvantage schools that want to accumulate the capital reserves necessary to get bank financing--especially in a tight credit market. Moreover, Nida said, the District dropped the proposal into the budget after only cursory discussion.

"It was done with a minimum of interaction and consideration," said Nida. "It was under the heading of preliminary dialogue and was never intended by me as something that was going into the text of the budget."

Nida added that there are also unexplored equity issues involved. DCPS, which has been steadily losing enrollment, has spent hundreds of millions over the last couple of years to renovate and redesign buildings. While enrollment in charters has boomed, they face a cut in facilities spending.

"My assumption is that we want to have equity in funding across the entire system," Nida said. He is drafting a board resolution that will ask the District to pull the change from the budget until there is more consultation.


Bill Turque

By Bill Turque  |  April 22, 2009; 12:55 PM ET
Categories:  Bill Turque , Education  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Charter School for Teen Mothers to Close
Next: Service Bill Signing a Tribute to Kennedy

Comments

Fenty consistently does what he wants with no respect for the constituents he represents and he allows his appointees to do the same with no reproach. People complain, fuss, cuss and then let him continue as is without exercising their rights. Things will not change until the people who voted him in either demand and force a change or vote him out along with the team he has put in place.

Posted by: southyrndiva | April 22, 2009 1:27 PM | Report abuse

Fenty once again has shown that he could care less about those who elected him. I can't wait until it's time for re-election. His dictator-type style of leadership is very annoyning. Perhaps a recall petition should be in order? He has surrounded himself with a bunch of ass-kissing wimps who could care less about the people of the district as well. I am ashamed of myself for voting him into office.

Posted by: conbess928 | April 22, 2009 3:27 PM | Report abuse

But wait a minute. According to Fenty, money just comes out of thin air. Like, giving the cabbies the lowest rate in the entire nation must work simply because the idea came from his own narcissistic brain. And since he's not feeling the pinch, then everything's dandy. Besides, Fenty isn't so much worried about the future of charter schools as long as the ordinary public schools look as though they're improving under the guidance of Michelle Rhee. That's the real political booster.

Posted by: starclimber9 | April 23, 2009 12:29 AM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company