WTU asks for Wednesday hearing to stay layoffs

With laid off teachers scheduled to be dropped from the District payroll on Nov. 2, the Washington Teachers' Union asked a D.C. Superior Court Monday for a temporary restraining order to keep them in place until legal issues can be sorted out.

The 266 teachers and support staff represented by the union have been on administrative leave with pay and benefits since they were dismissed on Oct. 2. The union sued five days later, asking for a permanent injunction that would prohibit the District from executing the firings until the matter can be reviewed by an arbitrator or a court.

An initial hearing on the injunction is scheduled for Nov. 5, three days after union members are scheduled to be separated from the school system.

A temporary restraining order, if granted, would freeze the firings for 10 days, enabling teachers to stay on the payroll while the Nov. 5 hearing goes forward. The union asked for a hearing on that order to be held Wednesday.

Bill Turque

By Bill Turque |  October 26, 2009; 7:16 PM ET  | Category:  Bill Turque , Education
Previous: New Haven teachers pact: message to Rhee? | Next: Another vote for same-sex marriage

Comments

Please email us to report offensive comments.



Good luck!!

Posted by: candycane1 | October 26, 2009 8:49 PM

A TRO would be the proper move. It would obviously be more difficult to reinstate employees once separated than holding over until all relevant facts have been reviewed. I'm hoping the best for colleagues. Keep the faith!!

Posted by: schooletal | October 26, 2009 9:14 PM

This is the right move, under the circumstances, but too bad it ever had to come to this. Firing these teachers didn't help the children and the TRO is not about the children. It's adult games, which Rhee instigated and loves to play.

She's in her element right now.

Posted by: efavorite | October 26, 2009 11:18 PM

The union should contribute big to Fenty's re-election campaign and he'll give them a contract.

Posted by: edlharris | October 27, 2009 12:20 AM

So on point as always, edlharris and efavorite. Perhaps campaign contributors are calling some of this bogus, "baloney" shots to begin with!

Posted by: southyrndiva | October 27, 2009 7:41 PM

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.



 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2009 The Washington Post Company