Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Elections board to hear Fenty request for unaffiliated voters

Nikita R Stewart

UPDATED: 9:53 a.m.

The D.C. Board of Elections and Ethics will hold a special meeting at 8:30 a.m. Wednesday to hear a request from the campaign of Mayor Adrian M. Fenty (D) to allow unaffiliated voters to participate in the Sept. 14 Democratic primary.

Marc Elias, an attorney for the Fenty campaign, sent a letter to the board requesting a hearing be held before early voting begins Aug. 30.

Unaffiliated voters are those who list "no party" on their registration.

The elections board recently approved rules to comply with new election laws. Voters must have registered with a party 30 days or more before the Sept. 14th primary to cast ballots in a party's contests. Unaffiliated voters will not be allowed to vote.

According to Elias, the rule-making is not in keeping with past practices and is not consistent with the campaign's discussions with the board's general counsel in July.

The decision is important to Fenty, who is in a tight race against chief challenger Council Chairman Vincent C. Gray (D). Gray has won seven out of eight Democratic straw polls around the city. One strategy of the Fenty campaign was to broaden the electorate to unaffiliated voters.

Elias, in the letter to the elections board, noted that the rule-making was announced Aug. 12, leaving little time for unaffiliated voters to join the Democratic party by the Aug. 16 registration deadline.

Fenty's request comes after he blocked a D.C. Council-approved bill that would have adopted federal regulations against paying someone to vote or register to vote, or accepting payment to vote or register to vote.

The mayor did not sign the bill while the council was in summer recess. The inaction triggered a pocket veto. Fenty has said he did not sign the legislation because he did not believe council members should change laws that would affect elections in which they were running.

D.C. Wire asked Alysoun McLaughlin, spokeswoman for the elections board, whether unaffiliated voters have participated in primaries in the past as claimed by the Fenty campaign.

She wrote in an e-mail: "I don't know what numbers they are analyzing. Certainly any voter can cast a provisional ballot and we keep a record of that. Voters also change their party affiliation over time, and they may be looking at the current party affiliation.

The answer to your question, in any event, is that ballots of unaffiliated voters have not been counted in primary elections in the past. The single biggest reason that we rejected special ballots in the presidential preference primary in 2008 was because the voter was not affiliated with a party.

The Board issued a rule on August 12 clarifying that policy that they are asking us to reconsider. That is the purpose of the hearing."

By Nikita R Stewart  |  August 24, 2010; 9:15 AM ET
Categories:  2010 District Election , D.C. Council , Mayor Fenty , Nikita Stewart , Vincent C. Gray  | Tags: Adrian M. Fenty, D.C. Board of Elections and Ethics, Vincent C. Gray  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Fenty campaign trying to include unaffiliated voters in primary
Next: Gray attacks Fenty on Sinclair Skinner contract

Comments

WOW! So now, in his desperation, he wants to cancel the primary election and go straight for the general election.

He is saying he doesn't like who the democrats will choose (since theres a good chance it wont be him) so let's allow everyone else to vote in the democratic election so they will over rule the democrats choice. Well as we all know, Fenty is not one who supports democracy at any level so why should we expect it here.

He does not CARE what you think, what you want or what your concerns are if they are contrary to what he wants...

BUT..... he promises to take your concerns into account AFTER he steals the election. Yea right. And that bridge you sold me was so nice I want to buy another one.

Posted by: tformation1 | August 24, 2010 7:15 PM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company