Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Posted at 5:06 PM ET, 12/30/2010

Norton asks Obama to mention D.C. voting rights in State of the Union address

By Ben Pershing

The District may face an uphill fight to secure voting rights in the House this Congress, but D.C. Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D) is hoping to win a rhetorical victory next month -- a mention of the issue in President Obama's State of the Union address.

Norton wrote a letter to Obama on Thursday asking him to "reiterate your support for voting rights and greater democracy for the citizens who live in the nation's capital, in keeping with your co-sponsorship of the bill when you were in the Senate." Referencing the issue, Norton added, would help "to maintain the terrific momentum we achieved in the voting rights struggle in anticipation of regaining the House and maintaining the Senate in the 2012 elections."

Norton's tactic is not a new one. She wrote a similar letter to Obama in January 2010 at the urging of local activists, in which she noted that "[t]he stars are surely aligned" for voting rights advocates to succeed this year. Obama did not mention the issue in his 2010 speech, nor did he bring it up in his February 2009 address to a joint session of Congress.

House voting rights for D.C. wasn't a popular topic for previous presidents, either. The lone reference to the subject appears to have come in President Jimmy Carter's January 1981 address -- which was actually a written message, delivered just days before he left office. At the time, not enough states had ratified a proposed constitutional amendment granting the District a House vote, and Carter said, "It is my hope that this inequity will be rectified."

Might Obama decide to be the first president to deliver such a plea in person? We'll find out in three weeks.

By Ben Pershing  | December 30, 2010; 5:06 PM ET
Categories:  Ben Pershing, Eleanor Holmes Norton, Voting Rights  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Marriott's $46 million tax abatement for Adams Morgan hotel still a hot topic
Next: Holder, diplomats expected at Gray mayoral inauguration


what for? for what? our tax to DC government is $184,807,658 per

Posted by: Rockvillers | December 31, 2010 1:49 PM | Report abuse

Yes lets focus on rhetorical victories since we screwed up the actual victory. Glad there's a handgun ban in DC, now excuse me as I lie in bathtub while the firefight outside winds down.

Posted by: plugugly7 | December 31, 2010 1:59 PM | Report abuse

Pershing babbled, "The District may face an uphill fight to secure voting rights in the House this Congress,"
Of course it does. That would require a constitutional amendment. Have you even read the Constitution?

Posted by: illogicbuster | January 5, 2011 12:11 PM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.

characters remaining

RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company