Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Posted at 4:10 PM ET, 12/ 6/2010

Three council members to propose tax hikes; Gray's position unclear

By Tim Craig

Three D.C. Council members plan to push ahead Tuesday with proposals to raise taxes to help solve the city's budget shortfall, even though Mayor-elect Vincent C. Gray (D) is not likely to go along with the idea.

Gray, the council chairman, is putting the final touches on refinements he made to a proposal from outgoing Mayor Adrian M. Fenty (D) to slash more than $100 million from the budget to close a mid-year shortfall. The council plans to take the first of two votes on the proposal Tuesday.

In recent weeks, some advocates have been pressuring Gray to consider an array of potential revenue increases - many of which were aimed at the wealthy - to soften the cuts in human service programs.

But Gray has been signaling to members he would prefer to take up the question of a tax increase next spring, when, as mayor, he likely will face a shortfall of at least several hundred million dollars. Gray is instead cobbling together an array of savings - including potential one-day furloughs of city employees on paid holidays - to raise some additional revenue.

Not only is Gray trying to close the $188 million mid-year shortfall, he's looking to raise or save up to an additional $50 million to place in the city's reserve funds, according to council members. But Gray's budget deliberations have largely been done out of public view, making it difficult for council members and advocates to gauge exactly what he will propose late Monday or early Tuesday prior to the vote.

Even though Gray isn't likely to embrace a tax increase this year, Council members Tommy Wells (D-Ward 6), Michael A. Brown (I-At large) and Jim Graham (D-Ward 1) are all expected to push for an increase Tuesday when the council takes up the vote.

"You will see all of us doing our own (proposal) or teaming up behind one," Brown said.

Under the proposal being floated by Brown, the city would create two new top income tax brackets for wage earners, one that starts at $200,000 and another at $1 million. Currently, all District residents who make $40,000 or more pay an 8.5 percent income tax rate. Brown wants to raise the rate to 8.9 percent for those who residents who earn between $200,000 and $1 million. Residents who earn more than $1 million would pay a 9.2 percent rate.

Wells, the chairman of the Human Services Committee, plans to offer a competing proposal that would result in higher taxes for anyone who earns more than $70,000. If approved, residents who earn between $75,000 and $150,000 would see their tax rate rise to 8.75 percent while while those who make up to $500,000 would see a half-percentage point hike. Wage-earners who make at least $500,000 would see a 1 percent increase.

Instead of just targeting the rich, Wells argues upper-middle class District residents should also share the burden in balancing the budget.

"I'm trying to change the conversation away from the millionaires tax so everyone gives up something," said Wells, who said he won't support the budget unless it includes additional revenue.

But several council members said Monday they prefer to wait until the spring to deal with taxes. Council members David A. Catania (I-At large) and Phil Mendelson (D-At large), for example, both said they are unlikely to support a tax increase Tuesday but could embrace one in the spring if its part of a larger gap-closing proposal.

"I view what is happening tomorrow as the start of broad-based discussion," said Mendelson.

By Tim Craig  | December 6, 2010; 4:10 PM ET
Categories:  Budget  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Southeast students quiz filmaker on Barry's 'Nine Lives'
Next: Protestors disrupt D.C. Council budget hearing

Comments

We could save $1.5 billion if we eliminate streetcars from the DC budget. That would be a great place to start.

Posted by: UndecidedVoter | December 6, 2010 4:38 PM | Report abuse

Undecided- There isn't $1.5 billion in the budget for streetcar, so check your facts and stop the hysteria. There is a plan that for a $1.5 billion system that would be paid for in part by the feds and developers but it's not up for discussion now, it's just a plan.

Posted by: PJW4 | December 6, 2010 6:03 PM | Report abuse

70K means Upper Middle Class??? How much home can you afford in DC with that? And further more, I wouldn't be so opposed to paying more taxes if I could actually park my car on my street w/out getting a ticket for one reason or another... what exactly are we paying for?

Posted by: missboo | December 7, 2010 8:33 AM | Report abuse

PJW4: You've scolded me to check my facts while you imply that the federal government has agreed to pay part of the cost of streetcars. You're the one who needs to do some fact checking here. The federal government has NOT agreed to pay for any significant portion of DC's proposed streetcar system. The streetcar concept is an incredible waste of DC taxpayer dollars. For $1.5 billion, DC could fund a bus system that would make a mockery of streetcars.

Streetcars offer less seating than buses, they require passengers to walk much further to get to and from the stops, and they cannot detour around obstacles (like buses can). When streetcars are not given their own dedicated rights-of-way, as in much of Europe, they are as slow as other traffic and there will be accidents with motor vehicles and bicyles.

When will the streetcar madness stop?

Posted by: UndecidedVoter | December 7, 2010 9:24 AM | Report abuse

Councilmember Tommy Wells wants to raise taxes on the middle class - during a recession. Wells says that everybody should share the burden - even the middle class.

I have a proposal for Wells. Wells makes over $100,000 per year in his part-time job.

His Chief of Staff makes over $100,000 also. So, Councilmemebr Wells and his CoS can each voluntarily give up 15% of their pre-tax income to the District government.

Wells, will put your money where your mouth is?

Posted by: ObjectiveReader1 | December 9, 2010 8:22 AM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company