Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Posted at 1:51 PM ET, 01/10/2011

D.C. Democratic Committee head says her Biddle vote 'is private'

By Tim Craig

The head of the D.C. Democratic State Committee is refusing to publicly state who she voted for in last week's party vote on an interim at-large council member, calling the matter "private."

Anita Bonds, the head of the state committee, said the 82-member committee used an "open ballot" process when it selected Sekou Biddle over Vincent Orange to temporarily fill D.C. Council Chairman's Kwame Brown's former at-large seat.

But Bonds said an "open ballot" doesn't mean individual committee members should have to go public with their votes.

"An open ballot is where when you get your ballot, and your ballot is recorded ... individual members do not have to tell people," Bonds said.

According to Democratic National Committee bylaws, "all meetings ... and all other party committees, commissions and bodies shall be open to the public and votes shall not be taken by secret ballot."

But local and national party officials are divided over how that provision should be applied to state-level parties and intraparty elections.

A few hours before Thursday's vote, Biddle posted on Twitter that he won Bonds's support. Bonds, however, said Monday she "wasn't pledged to anyone," although she declined to state whom she ultimately supported.

"My vote is private," Bonds said.

Thursday's meeting also highlighted another longstanding practice in local District politics - low-dollar cash donations to political committees.

During the meeting, party leaders passed around a bucket to collect cash donations that do not have be reported as coming from a specific individual. Wesley Williams, a spokesman for the Office of Campaign Finance, said local parties could collect up to $24.99 in cash without having to itemize it on finance reports.

"What you are supposed to do is announce to the crowd, 'We can accept $24.99 in cash and anything above that has to come in by check or money order,' " Williams said. "There can be instances where someone can throw a $50 or $100 in there, but you've made your effort."

Bonds said all the cash donations conformed to campaign finance regulations and will be reported as "lump sum" contributions.

"The treasurer immediately took control and it was only like $200," said Bonds, adding that the money was then placed in a "lock box."

Paul Craney, executive director of the D.C. Republican Party, said his organization usually does not solicit or accept cash donations.

"We never pass the hat, that is the worst thing you can do," Craney said. "Cash is such a hassle to deal with."

By Tim Craig  | January 10, 2011; 1:51 PM ET
Categories:  Campaign Finance, D.C. Council, D.C. Democrats & Republicans, Kwame Brown, Sekou Biddle, Tim Craig  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: D.C. government observes moment of silence for Ariz. victims
Next: Lopez files signatures, gets endorsement for at-large race

Comments

Tim,

1. The DCDSC by-laws don't speak the the election of temp appointments to the council.

2. The hat was well controlled, and we are very well aware of the $25 limit on cash contributions. We are aware on how to report those contributions. Furhtermore, just because Mr. Craney is not will to accept those contributions because of the nature of the reporting, is his choice. It's not the worst thing and his use of the word usually just may come back to haunt his statement.

It's a bit slanted here!

Posted by: bdaneker | January 11, 2011 10:18 AM | Report abuse

Nothing here is surprising. An out of touch organization obviously run by incompetent and disloyal people.

I am not pro Orange but he is a member and has been a member of this organization for awhile? As a matter of fact, Orange played a major role in assisting them out of trouble from the Democratic Convention in 2008. The DCDSC was looking at $30K in fines. Wow, what loyalty did DCDSC show Orange?

Now they do not want to reveal their "open" votes?
Madam president, please show some leadership or step aside!

Posted by: dropem95 | January 11, 2011 11:20 AM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company