Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

E-mail Bill | RSS Feed | In-depth coverage: Education Page | Follow The Post's education coverage: Twitter | Facebook

'First Lady' Rhee meets press

Chancellor Michelle A. Rhee tried out her prospective new role as mayor's wife Monday at the Sacramento Press Club, drawing some laughs as she described how she briefly considered trying to clean up her act to serve as a political spouse.

"I am known in D.C. as being very hard core, very tough," she said," according to a local television news clip. "People have called me the terminator, the hammer, the dragon lady. Those things might be OK for my day job, but they are certainly not the kinds of adjectives you would want to use to describe the mayor's wife."

She said she spoke with her finance, Mayor Kevin Johnson, about toning it down. His response, according to Rhee: "Honey, just be you. You're not going to be able to hide very long who you are. Let's not build false hope and expectations."

So, Rhee offered a brief description: "I am someone who does not mince words. I am someone who does not spare feelings. And I am someone who does not pull punches when it comes to doing what is right for kids."

Rhee also put in a pitch for the importance of mayoral control of local school systems, something that is barred by California law. "Here in Sacramento there are too many schools and too many kids that are failing to meet their potential and radical change is necessary," she said.

Follow D.C. Schools Insider every day at washingtonpost.com/dcschools.
And for admissions advice, college news and links to campus papers,
please check out our new Higher Education page at washingtonpost.com/higher-ed.
Bookmark it!

By Bill Turque  |  May 25, 2010; 1:35 PM ET
 
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Pink slip season for principals
Next: How to return those Stevie Wonder tickets

Comments

Will count on at least 20 Rhee-bashing comments by tomorrow at noon at the latest. Go!

Posted by: axolotl | May 25, 2010 3:15 PM | Report abuse

axoloti; "Honey, just be you." Those words rings volumes...as you can catch more flies with honey than with vinegar.

Wasn't this past Monday a workday in the District for the school-system. Ooops I forgot, they were passing out pink-slips to principals. I am seeing a pattern everytime Rhee is having a similar happy life on the outside...she's wrecking havoc among others. Example...when she [Rhee] was getting engaged; did she not RIF'd teachers.

Lord knows...when she's married and get's pregnant...we will be in for a bumpy 9-months which equates to an academic school year. Mark your calendar; September marriage, September pregnancy and June birth....that will be her ticket to leave on the next jet-plane. C'mon who in their right mind will fire a pregnant Chancellor...think about it.

Posted by: PowerandPride | May 25, 2010 3:27 PM | Report abuse

Yes, she will get bashed because she deserves it. No one should be expected to praise someone who is obviously incompetent.

Posted by: resc | May 25, 2010 3:35 PM | Report abuse

axolotl,
You really have a problem.
I'd suggest Bermuda (sans laptop & Blackberry) and some beach-vendor ganja.

Posted by: phillipmarlowe | May 25, 2010 3:45 PM | Report abuse

Did Miss Rhee tell the Sacremento Press Club who called her "dragonlady"
Or the "terminator" (didn't she realise she was in California)
Or the "hammer" (or as Harry Callahan said as some guy walked in front of his car while on patrol in San Francisco "hammerhead".)

Just looking for evidence.

Posted by: phillipmarlowe | May 25, 2010 3:49 PM | Report abuse

Maybe she should move to California and be the one to impose the "radical change" Sacramento so needs... Ironically, she too need to make some radical changes both inside and out!

Posted by: missboo | May 25, 2010 4:02 PM | Report abuse

Beware Sacramento....you're next!

Posted by: UrbanDweller | May 25, 2010 4:44 PM | Report abuse

Her future husband (and past sexual predator) says: "Honey, just be you. You're not going to be able to hide very long who you are. Let's not build false hope and expectations."

Yeah, let's not build false hope and expectations of having a CIVIL person in either the role of Chancellor or "first lady". I find Rhee's words to be chilling in their arrogance. And the constant justification of her B.S. as simply doing "what's right for the children" is ringing pretty hollow.

Posted by: dccitizen1 | May 25, 2010 6:00 PM | Report abuse

I'd like to speak to the teenage girls with whom her intended is accused of having inappropriate sexual contact and ask them if they think her intervening actions to basically shut them up about said inproprieties was in their best interest. I kinda think dragon lady and terminator wouldn't be their words of choice to describe her.

Posted by: schooletal | May 25, 2010 6:56 PM | Report abuse

Go ahead - bash Rhee. Your irrelevant attacks on her spouse show your desperation.

Posted by: fredcorgi1 | May 25, 2010 7:33 PM | Report abuse

Were they laughing with her or at her? Sacramento remembers well the ST Hope days and the misappropriation of funds that landed her fiance in hot water with the feds. Sacramento blogs were not kind to him or to her when she arrived. So to tell the crowd "I am not one to spare feelings" might be the very thing to keep that relationship bicoastal for sure. To the first husband: You better think about that statement as well. You have two children with her. Whoa!

Posted by: candycane1 | May 25, 2010 8:29 PM | Report abuse

Rhee is truly one of the saddest and most pathetic figures on the national stage. Sarah Palin without the authentic swagger. There's a petrified soul tortured by the full knowledge of her inadequacies behind that broom.

If you are really strong other people will say it for you. But it's now left to her, and her alone, to describe herself as some kind of formidable force. There are no kids who will say it, so Rhee has to call herself their defender. There are no parents or teachers or anyone directly involved in the DCPS who would not laugh in Rhee's face if she dared tell them how tough or hard core she is. Nobody's afraid of Michelle Rhee. The Chancellor must go all the way to Sacramento, to feed her delusions of grandeur. All they know about the DCPS in Sacramento is what they read in the Washington Post, the mouthpiece of the Kaplan Incessantly Test The Kids For The Sake Of Massive Corporate Profits Company. Think that's the company's full name.

Rhee failed long ago. She's being kept around by her masters for the sake of Adrian Fenty's re-election prospects. They've hired Anita Dunn to keep an eye on her and they are praying that Rhee does not embarass them too much between now and then.

Posted by: natturner | May 25, 2010 10:14 PM | Report abuse

Sorry, fredcorgi1, the comments about her role in the cover-up of her fiancé's scandalous behavior are not irrelevant. Her actions illustrate her poor judgment, especially as regards her oft-stated, faux concern about making decisions in children's best interest.

Posted by: schooletal | May 25, 2010 10:22 PM | Report abuse

I always wonder how many of these Rhee bashers have children in DC, and aren't part of the problem. I have a two year old son. I got my great education for free in Fairfax County. If Rhee goes, I start looking at houses in Fairfax. The thought of only moving a couple miles to pay lower taxes, get one of the best free public educations in the country and also qualify for in state tuition to quality VA colleges instead of fighting with Gray and the DCPS Unions seems like such an easy decision. Meanwhile, the Rhee bashers can continue to ensure DC is not a viable option for middle class families, thereby ensuring the tax base does not support typical resident expectations.

The city's success is dependent on great changes. It's clear to me that Marion Barry, Vincent Gray and others have failed to make any positive changes in this area for decades, and have in fact watched the system fail. Why to we all of the sudden think they are the answer?

Posted by: kseamen | May 25, 2010 11:06 PM | Report abuse

@kseamen: What makes you think that "Rhee bashers" think Marion Barry and Vincent Gray are "the answer"? The default argument of the Rhee supporters---that people who dislike her want the status quo, are holding the system back, etc etc, blah blah blah----is silly. You must have read the cherry picked test results and not the entire report. You think Rhee is "saving" DCPS? That's a joke.

Don't worry, somehow the truth will come out, as much as the Washington Post tries to hide it and build Rhee up. It might take a while more, but Rhee will finally be seen as what she is---a fraud and a pathetic person who knows next to nothing about education.

Posted by: dccitizen1 | May 26, 2010 6:29 AM | Report abuse

KJ is right about trying to clean up "honey's" image. Even that high-powered PR firm couldn't do it. There is no sense in creating false hope.

Posted by: MickeyK | May 26, 2010 9:44 AM | Report abuse

@Kseamen

You need to start looking for a house in Fairfax.

Stop trying to use Barry and Gray as an excuse for keeping this disgrace of a chancellor. Your real reasons are probably the fact that you are a new resident and tired of the long commute to your inner city job. You decided it was time to save gas money and you like the changing complexion of your area of DC.

I hope your two year old is not a girl because if you put faith in someone who claims to put children first but help cover up the alleged child abuse by her husband to be is very telling. Is your support really about education or something else?

Posted by: dccounselor72 | May 26, 2010 9:45 AM | Report abuse

Hey kseaman, I'm a DCPS parent. I did support Rhee at first. The system needs work and I'm the first to admit it.

I can tell you after three years she has only made things worse. The best and brightest of the system are leaving. I just found out another wonderful young teacher at our school is leaving.

Rhee is driving out talent. Rhee hurts children. Rhee is ruining my child's school and I think this is the end for my family. I loathe the suburbs, but that's where I'll be headed. I can't let Rhee destroy my child's chance at a good education.

Posted by: Title1SoccerMom | May 26, 2010 10:30 AM | Report abuse

Will count on at least 20 Rhee-bashing comments by tomorrow at noon at the latest. Go!

Posted by: axolotl | May 25, 2010 3:15 PM

******************************

Wrong again, axolotl

Posted by: phillipmarlowe | May 26, 2010 12:35 PM | Report abuse

kseamen--the people with the bullying responses to your comment are part of a veteran cabal who infest this board. Some are on the DCPS payroll or have other vested interests, e.g., union dominance. The members of this group changes little. They are virulently against change of almost any sort in DCPS. They don't believe teachers should be responsible for much if anything. They also oppose charters and ignore the best practices that top school systems use. They contradict in thrust what you can hear in pta's around the city and other neighborhood groups: keep going with reforms. For every teacher departure bemoaned there are several others hoped for. We still have plenty of good teachers, though, but they and the parents, for the most part, don't bother with debating the gasbags on this blogue. These commenters have little in the way of manners, also. One repeatedly used the murder of Brian Betts in a lame attempt to bash Rhee. You don't want someone like that teaching your kids.

Posted by: axolotl | May 26, 2010 12:45 PM | Report abuse

If we had vested union dominance in mind axolotl, we would have already sent the goons over to your house. Remember poor Kenneth Gladney.

And what's with this "dominance" stuff.


Are you trying to hit on someone again??

Posted by: phillipmarlowe | May 26, 2010 2:16 PM | Report abuse

I love how Rhee thinks "the importance of mayoral control of local school systems, something that is barred by California law." LOL.

We all know Rhee would not qualify for superintendent/chancellor in any metropolitan school district where you have to run for the position based on real qualifications.

Posted by: mselmo32 | May 26, 2010 2:22 PM | Report abuse

As a survivor of DC public schools, I cannot believe some of the comments on this article. I had classes where it was a crapshoot as to whether or not the teacher would show up. Parents, you have no idea. Ask your kids about their experiences in DCPS after they go to college and compare with kids in good schools. You just have no idea how bad it is until you've been through it. The bar for teacher quality in DC is so abysmally low and the system is so bloated and mismangaged its failure can hardly be understated.

Things Rhee has done
1) Fired as many of these "teachers" as possible
2) Closed builders that were only half full. Sorry you know have to walk two extra blocks to the other school that was only half full.
3) Required standards for lesson plans. I realize it is a drastic leap that classes should actually have a purpose.

Now she wants to pay DC teachers about twice as much as anywhere else in the country, so that we can attract enough resumes not to be forced to pick up these babysitters. What exactly do people have a problem with? To the man whose daughters' teacher is leaving, if she is leaving because she is actually going to be held accountable for what happens in her classroom, then good riddance. More likely its that she hates teaching in a system that is so god awful. Rhee is trying to fix the engine while the car is running. Its not easy.

Rhee has her problems. She has this crazy idea that if you are right, people should just agree with you and you shouldn't have to play politics.

Posted by: Andeleisha | May 26, 2010 2:24 PM | Report abuse

Also, she raised test scores. Just sayin'. Love ya, Meesh.

Posted by: cbr1 | May 26, 2010 2:38 PM | Report abuse

I agree with Andeleisha. I'm of the mind that if a teacher thinks that 6th grade students reading at the 2nd grade level is ok, then they should probably hit the road.

Posted by: kym101009 | May 26, 2010 2:44 PM | Report abuse

I love how Rhee thinks "the importance of mayoral control of local school systems, something that is barred by California law."
We all know Rhee would not qualify for superintendent/chancellor in any metropolitan school district where you have to run for the position based on real qualifications.

Posted by: mselmo32 | May 26, 2010 2:59 PM | Report abuse

Accountability?
Michelle Rhee -- intervening to cover up for the inappropriate sexual conduct with female minors (high school students),
extreme sexual harassment of teen Americorps staff, financial mismanagement of school funds, and graft -- also, attempts to arrange financial pay-offs & 'hush money' by her boyfriend-counterpart Kevin Johnson.
The Inspector General (Gerald Walpin) had been looking into the reported misuse of $850,000 in federal grant money by Mr. Johnson...who was accused of spending AmeriCorps grant money by having members wash his car, run personal errands, and engage in partisan political activities.
-- see the grim details --
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/nov/21/hill-report-names-dc-schools-chief/?page=2

Sacramento, CA: (May-20-08) A girl, who wished to stay unnamed, brought a sexual molestation lawsuit against Sacramento mayoral candidate Kevin Johnson, alleging that Johnson, who was 29 and playing for the Phoenix Suns, molested her when she was 16. Court papers reveal that Johnson denied the girl's allegations in the suit, though he agreed to pay $230,000 to resolve litigation. Johnson stated that he will pay some money upfront and the rest in six-month installments. Sources for the girl said that some of the money was to be used for medical, therapy and legal costs.
As part of the settlement agreement, the girl and her mother were restricted from talking publicly about the case, which originally sought $750,000 in damages from the Sacramento mayoral candidate. [KXTV NEWS 10: JOHNSON AGREED TO PAY GIRL IN MOLESTATION CLAIM, ACCORDING TO DOCUMENT DRAFT] --- http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/case/kevin-johnson-molestation-accusation.html

Posted by: honestaction | May 26, 2010 3:01 PM | Report abuse

It is not that DC residents don't want better schools, it's that she and Adrian Fenty are making moves without giving reasons. I have a friend that teaches special needs children, and that school is on the list to be closed next year, and they want to put these kids with special needs kids in regualar classrooms next year. What will that do, take away from educational time kids need having istruction, the teacher will be focused on the child with the most needs. I was educated through DCPS, and all systems have their share of problems, and I do agree DC needs to raise its bar on education, but the first issue is the budget, and getting adequate facilities, and books ETC...I didn't agree with her firing those teachers at once, because they all didn't deserve it. I think if they wanted to make the systeem better, they should have started by making the educators already there better. Bringing in new teachers will not change the landscape of DCPS. Some of these kids are so broken from home life by the time they get to school, their minds are hardly in the class with them. Our teachers are more than teachers, they become some children's second parent, mentor or friend. It takes more than a degree to teach!

Posted by: dmitch_1980 | May 26, 2010 3:11 PM | Report abuse

What Was sleazy Michelle Rhee’s ‘Damage Control’
for Kevin Johnson?
-- Inappropriate sexual harassment & molestation
of several female teens (h.s. students & teen staffers).
-- "Hush Money" pay-offs re: several incidents
-- Financial Mismanagement and Graft pertaining
to federal grants ($850,000 to be used for school programs)
-- Attempted behind-the-scenes criminal manipulation
of federal audits & inspections by legal entities
http://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local-beat/What_Was_Michelle_Rhee_s__Damage_Control__for_Kevin_Johnson_-70647202.html

Posted by: honestaction | May 26, 2010 3:17 PM | Report abuse

Welcome andaleisha and the other new posters here.

The teachers RIFd last October did not have bad records - Rhee herself said that - when she wasn't popping off about them being child molesters. Some of them were brand new and one was had a prestigious national board certification. Rhee honored her a few months before firing her.

Rhee did not raise scores - they have been going up slowly for over a decade. Besides it's teachers who raise scores - Rhee will tell you that -- and the score increase was recorded in the Spring of '09, before the RIF or any other firings.

By the way, those new teachers she wants to hire are inexperienced kids right out of college. It's too soon to know if they will be good teachers or not.

Finally, Congrats to Anita Dunn's media team for refining your methods so your shills sound more like real people.

Posted by: efavorite | May 26, 2010 4:28 PM | Report abuse

efavorite,
Your thoughtful contributions are diminished by others that signal complete denial. Andaleisha provides an unusual breath of fresh air and personal experience here. If you discount her experience and feelings by half, DCPS still has a grave problem in the instructional ranks (not its only serious problem). Everyone who disagrees can't be tagged as a shill or troll. And you might consider talking with a wider circle of parents, as well as staff of Council members. Let teacher and public opinion take their course. Let the teachers complete the vote (that will ratify the contract), let Fenty and Gray duke it out, and let change continue in the District schools. I don't think Ms. Rhee is going anywhere.

Posted by: axolotl | May 26, 2010 4:58 PM | Report abuse

Michelle Rhee is corrupt and exhibits pathological mendacity. According to her own sleazy remarks, why was she so afraid
of the details of the proposed Teacher's Contract leaking out to the purview of the teachers, media & general public ??? She doesn't seem to get the concepts of public governance, 'sunshine' policies & rules, citizen awareness & participation, democracy, or the first amendment of the U.S. constitution. She is absolutely clueless about inspiring synergistic teamwork.

Posted by: honestaction | May 26, 2010 8:09 PM | Report abuse

Wow. I'm done with Rhee's put downs of DC parents, but I think some of the comments on this site go too far.

I'm a parent of a 1st grader and a 7th grader. I was a Fenty supporter and appreciated the work to fix our schools. However, in my personal experience with both of them, Fenty and Rhee are so arrogant and dismissive of any democratic or collaborative process, I can't support either one of them any more. At my daughter's school, because Rhee refused to consult with our strong, healthy parents' group, she autocratically instituted policies based upon her own ignorance and prejudice. She could have changed her mind after finally talking with us, or at least conversed with us about why having a half-time principal was better for our children.

But instead any dialog, Rhee was more interested in appearing strong and powerful. Generally, it's dangerous when someone in power likes their power too much. Specifically, Rhee's love of her own power has severely damaged my daughter's middle school education.

Our daughter's school was a successful, healthy educational community. We could have been some of the best partners for continuing school reforms across the city. We can speak proudly and confidently about the gifts of the reform DCPS. Instead, Fenty and Rhee have squashed us and our children like we are insignificant bugs to be swept out of the way for their grand schemes and self-righteousness.

Posted by: MikeWilker | May 26, 2010 10:38 PM | Report abuse

kym1010009 - I've never heard of a teacher who thought it was ok for a 6th grader to be reading at a 2nd grade level. Not even Michelle Rhee has accused DC teachers of that!

It's an interesting way of trying to make DC teachers look bad to readers here, but it's a very old technique, called a "straw man argument." You set up a straw man, i.e., something unreal, then shoot it down, making the issue seem legitimate in the meantime.

There is certainly a reality that too many kids are way behind in reading. This continues to be a problem in high school, when teachers try to teach literature or science to kids who read at a grade school level. The fault lies mainly in a system, not controlled by teachers, that pushes kids along through the grades irrespective of their achievement.

Posted by: efavorite | May 27, 2010 8:30 AM | Report abuse

Andeleisha speaks the truth and those paid-drinking-the-union-koolaid hacks who doubt what the so-called "teachers" were really like need to read and re-read this person's words because they know the truth.

Those of you with an anti-Rhee bias, you simply do not speak the truth at all. I've caught so many of you in lies over the last two years it's not funny, but you come back to try to fool another group of readers.

Posted by: bbcrock | May 27, 2010 12:00 PM | Report abuse

By the way, I am fascinated with the "dog whistle" racism that Fenty is "arrogant" because of course a black man must shuck and jive, bow and scrape. Some of you want to send DC back to 1973.

Posted by: bbcrock | May 27, 2010 12:01 PM | Report abuse

efavorite lied to everyone when they wrote:
"kym1010009 - I've never heard of a teacher who thought it was ok for a 6th grader to be reading at a 2nd grade level. Not even Michelle Rhee has accused DC teachers of that!"

I have told you and told you about people just like this. You, sir or madam, are a liar. You have been told and you have heard. You are a liar who lies publicly on this board. You have no standards of decency. good riddance to you, creep!

Posted by: bbcrock | May 27, 2010 12:03 PM | Report abuse

I don't mean to lose my cool here, but the sheer audacity of some creep claiming that they "never heard" about a 6th grade teacher who thinks it's ok for a student to read at the second grade level means quite simply THEY HAVE NO IDEA WHAT REALITY IS LIKE IN THE WORST DCPS ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS! It's a comment that screams, "I am ignorant of what really goes on in DCPS! Stop listening to what I have to say!" I mean REALLY efavorite, you really really have no idea what the teachers I met in 2007 were like. So STOP WRITING! You live in a dream world where no 6ht grade teacher would pass a student who reads at a 2nd grade level! If you don't get it then just stop blathering on and on in your fantasy world where this doesn't exist. You sound like Rush Limbaugh claiming racism doesn't exist! Do you get how out of touch you are?

Posted by: bbcrock | May 27, 2010 12:11 PM | Report abuse

I have heard a few parents complain about teacher incompetence, but I have never heard a teacher say it was ok for 6th graders to be reading at a 2nd grade level. That is a factual statement about my experience.

Posted by: efavorite | May 27, 2010 1:13 PM | Report abuse

(re: the Inspector General situation, Kevin Johnson's school-violating sexcapades and egregious financial corruption & Rhee's coverup tactics) -- "..... reading the entire report right down to the interview of Jacqueline Wong-Hernandez, the former employee of St. Hope Academy Charter Schools -- Your jaw will drop, your eyes will pop out of your head. No matter how you try to play this report it looks stinky. Just a for instance: Michelle Rhee was listed as a board member of St. Hope. Simultaneously she was listed as: the consultant for the New Teacher Project, the consultant for the reconstruction bridge span, the consultant for the reconstruction of the HR department, while on another memo she was listed as the COO. In yet another letter she was listed as the President and Johnson as the CEO. So many hats for one person and absolutely no conflict of interest, is there, in being both a board member and a consultant for the very board of which you are a member. Sarcasm in that last sentence. The discrepencies are legion in this report. Just read the summary of charges.... -- view source (scroll down) -- http://conductingtheinnerlight.edublogs.org/page/2/

Posted by: honestaction | May 27, 2010 1:18 PM | Report abuse

..... According to these charges (Kevin) Johnson used Americorps money and Americorps volunteers in complete violation of the government contract and volunteer contract. These volunteers are supposed to be used for the community and as tutors for students in schools. According to the report none of the volunteers did a single hour of tuturing for their time at St. Hope. What they did do was wash KJ’s car, clean his place (Johnson told one employee that the Americorps volunteers were there for “grunt work”), worked as clerks in the St. Hope store, canvassed the neighborhoods for candidates for local political offices, used them to solicit funds for St. Hope – even traveling to NYC on the Americorps money to do so. Johnson also misappropriated Americorps funds to pay SHA staff. Here was one of the most incredible things I found in this report: the volunteers, who were on a stipend of around $4000 plus dollars, were charged rent for their housing. The housing was owned by (wait for the drumroll please) The St. Hope Development Corporation – they were charged $300-$350 a month. SHA never revealed to federal authorities their relationship to SHD (you would think, though, that they would change the name of their corporation just a tad so that no one would notice – you know, like Enron). The sex allegations are here, as well. I don’t see how anyone can dismiss them as groundless nor as the accusations of people who hold a political motive. It is obvious throughout this report that there was a culture of abuse. The culture of power that Johnson practiced (one person describes him as micromanaging every thing right down to the position of all the office furniture) is one in which abuse is the predominant factor. Here is what disturbs me after reading this report: Michelle Rhee tried to bring St. Hope Charter schools into our school system to take over some schools. She tried to do this AFTER this report had been filed. It was only due to the due diligence on the part of the parents of those schools that would have been overtaken (deliberate use of word here) and their objection to SHA coming in because of what they found out in their own investigations." --- view source (scroll down) --- http://conductingtheinnerlight.edublogs.org/page/2/

Posted by: honestaction | May 27, 2010 1:21 PM | Report abuse

Natturner is my hero. Thank god for those of you who research and report on DCPS.

Posted by: quest4justice1 | May 27, 2010 7:12 PM | Report abuse

quest4justice--you may want research, but your idol provided none. suggest you go w phillymarlowe, who is more popular with the [ ], but lacks a sense of humor. wait fo his analysis of the ratification vote.

Posted by: axolotl | May 27, 2010 8:03 PM | Report abuse

bbcrock, you are the one who LIED, despite being an EDUCATED man.
Your 1st grade child, according to you, computes square roots.

You also accused Bill Turque, by repeating what Michelle Rhee said (to Fast Company), of "wildly exaggerating " her remarks.


Axolotl, I HAVE no sense of hunour??

Projection in your case, like your come-ons.

Posted by: phillipmarlowe | May 28, 2010 4:01 PM | Report abuse

For another view, check out the Sacramento Bee and their comments:
http://www.sacbee.com/2010/05/25/2774307/mayors-fiancee-brings-tough-on.html?

Posted by: edlharris | May 29, 2010 10:41 PM | Report abuse

Most popular comment left on the Sacramento Bee story cited by edharris, "Do us all a favor Ms. Rhee, go back to DC and take your fop of a fiancee with you. I'm sure you can find a job for him somewhere. Just keep him away from the high school girls." -- newsjunkie2

Posted by: natturner | May 29, 2010 11:52 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company