Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

E-mail Bill | RSS Feed | In-depth coverage: Education Page | Follow The Post's education coverage: Twitter | Facebook

Special ed rate issue likely headed to court

The District's attempt to contain the nearly $300 million-a-year cost of private school tuition and services for special education students is headed toward review by a federal judge. Steven Ney, one of the attorneys representing the 2,700 D.C. students in private schools, said Thursday that he will soon seek a preliminary injunction to block implementation of the new rate structure proposed last month by the Office of the State Superintendent of Education (OSSE).

Families can seek private placement for their children if it's determined that the public school system can't meet their needs. About a quarter of D.C.'s special ed population is in private schools, where tuition runs anywhere from $20,000 to $80,000 annually. OSSE says regulation of costs has historically run from lax to non-existent, and that a transparent rate structure is needed.

The proposed regulations are part of a broader effort by the District to ease its special education costs by tightening fees and "reintegrating" into public schools children it believes can be served in a less restrictive environment, as mandated by federal law. At the same time, it wants to make sure that students who need private placements get services in a cost-efficient manner. The new rate structure, which the OSSE wants to implement this fall, would set a base rate of $38,730 for a 180-day school year. The figure is tied to the uniform per-student funding level for special ed students, with an allowance for indirect costs. Fees paid for "related services," such a psychiatric or occupational therapy, would also be limited.

Student advocates say they understand the need for cost containment and reintegration, but charge that the OSSE has tried to hustle the complex set of changes through the system during the summer break. The 42 pages of new regulations were published in the D.C. Register on June 18 and a public hearing was called for the following week. Schools that already set their budgets and hired staff for the coming year now face possible layoffs and curtailing of programs.

"It's absolutely absurd to have a school start with one budget and then have to readjust that budget after a few weeks of school. It's just too fast and I don't think it's fair. If I was a principal I would be at my wit's end," said Anne Gay, executive director of the District of Columbia Association for Special Education, which represents about two dozen private schools attended by kids at District expense, including the Lab School, the Kingsbury Center, Kennedy Krieger, Ivymount and Rock Creek Academy.

Ney said the disruption to staff and programming posed by the rapid imposition of the new rates amounts to a de facto change in the students' placements, a violation of federal law and the consent decree that settled the Petties class action suit governing transportation and payment for students in private schools. He said he will ask that the effective date of the rates be pushed back to the beginning of the 2011-2012 school year and that the court review the fairness of what he called OSSE's "one size fits all" approach.

OSSE spokesman Chad Colby said the agency's intention to propose regulations "has been known for quite some time, including announcements made at the agency's performance hearing earlier this year. Also, public comments were collected in 2007 on setting rates."

Colby added that OSSE is prepared to accept base rates set by Maryland private schools that serve DCPS students, because he state has what he called a "rigorous" rate-setting process. Virginia and the District do not.

But "related service" costs would apparently still be subject to the new limits, and opponents of the say they are way out of line with market rates.

By Bill Turque  |  July 9, 2010; 9:10 AM ET
 
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Catania says stronger truancy sanctions needed against parents
Next: Teachers wait for District to show them the money

Comments

Again, everybody is playing games with these poor children lives. Is there not an attorney that wants to file a class- action suit against the district for their inability to provide a free and appropriate education for America’s most vulnerable? And I am not just talking about special needs children. Visit some of these DCPS and you will be appalled at what you see. Yes, some of it is the parents, black woman having child after child in some of the most unstable environments on records. But remember when education was the child’s way out? A whole lot of it is how IDEA is applied in the district and the fact that Social Security awards to parents with disabled kids replaced the TANF cash they use to get. Yes, a transparent rate structure is needed, but strict rules and governance of these schools are also needed. The fact is these schools are run as businesses with excessive overhead. They might talk a good talk, but what are these kids getting in return for all these tax dollars? How many kids graduate, what is their attendance record, how do they fair on examinations? What’s absolutely absurd Ms. Gay, is the relationships in this town that prey on the poor, while fatting their coffers. I am not saying some of these schools are not borderline great, but for the most part they are still not turning out productive citizens. Someone should do a story on the number of crimes committed in the metro area by special needs children, not to mention the numbers who have died. A lot of these kids are socially maladjusted, not emotionally disturbed or learning disabled. Social maladjustment is not something you can fix without complete overhaul of the communities they come from. Now I totally agree with Colby on the related services cost containment, but along with containing cost, he needs to come up with a way to verify the services were even delivered. I had a service provider billing Medicaid when he wasn’t even in the building five minutes or while he ran his own personal business on school time. I have examined Medicaid notes claiming service were provided to a child that was hospitalized during the dates indicated. Not all service providers commit fraudulent actions, but some do in SE DC.

Posted by: salemoaktree | July 9, 2010 10:40 AM | Report abuse

"It's absolutely absurd to have a school start with one budget and then have to readjust that budget after a few weeks of school. It's just too fast and I don't think it's fair. If I was a principal I would be at my wit's end,"

This is funny because this is what DCPS students, families, principals and teachers go through pretty much every year.

Posted by: citymom92 | July 9, 2010 11:36 AM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company