Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
On Twitter: dcsportsbog and PostSports  |  Facebook  |  E-mail alerts: Redskins and Sports  |  RSS

Blaming Clinton Portis

(By Toni L. Sandys - TWP)

"I think Mr. Snyder, with the pressure that's on him with the organization, probably going to have to make changes," Clinton Portis told reporters this week. "For everything that [goes] on, I'm to blame, so why wouldn't I be the change?"

I'm not sure that people have actually held Clinton Portis to blame for everything that goes on, but heck, someone might as well start. So I'll take one for the team and blame Portis for everything.

Okay, okay, okay, I'm not actually blaming Portis for everything. This is all I'm doing; pointing out that the much-discussed post-Sherm-Lewis offensive improvement actually took place not after Sherm Lewis was hired, but after Portis was injured near the end of the first quarter of the Falcons game. We discussed this very issue during this week's Redskins Insider podcast, but I thought I'd pull the numbers just for kicks.

For the first six games of the season, the Redskins operated with their previous playcalling arrangement, and with Portis as their primary running back. We'll call that Zorn-Portis.

For the first Eagles game, and the first 12 minutes of the Falcons game, the Redskins operated with some sort of input from Sherm Lewis, and with Portis as their primary running back. We'll call that Lewis-Portis.

And for the final 48 minutes of the Falcons game, and the following five games, the Redskins have operated with some sort of input from Sherm Lewis, and without Portis. We'll call that Post-Portis. And here we go.

First downs

Zorn-Portis: 15.7/game
Lewis-Portis: 18.3/game
Post-Portis: 20.0/game

Net yards

Zorn-Portis: 294/game
Lewis-Portis: 265/game
Post-Portis: 356/game


Zorn-Portis: 13.2/game
Lewis-Portis: 14.2/game
Post-Portis: 23.8/game

Sure, there are other factors at play. The Saints game went into overtime, providing extra minutes. Levi Jones came aboard. Offensive linemen mostly stopped getting hurt. And Jason Campbell said the team changed its offensive approach.

"We simplified our run game," Campbell recently said on the Redskins Radio Network, in explaining the offensive turnaround. "We simplified our run game, we're just gonna be a north-and-south, straight downhill [team], and running backs just see the hole and hit it. As far as the passing game, we changed our mindset. We're more attacking now [rather] than just work the ball, work the ball, try to score. We're trying to go for the home run on first down sometimes; even third and short we're still throwing the ball down the field. I think that's the biggest difference, is we're opening up the passing game and our run game is simplified."

I have no doubt all of that is true. But for a straight correlation between personnel and offensive stats, I'm not sure anything works better than the presence or absence of Portis.

By Dan Steinberg  |  December 17, 2009; 7:08 AM ET
Categories:  Redskins  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Joe Theismann's starring role in The Blind Side
Next: Skins reach out to ticket holders


Dan Snyder sucks cock!

Posted by: killdanigga | December 17, 2009 9:03 AM | Report abuse

Extra minutes in the Saint's game? Didn't Sellers fumble happen soon after the OT KO? Those few extra plays couldn't have made any real difference.

Posted by: TheDubb | December 17, 2009 9:08 AM | Report abuse

I believe Steinz was being me crazy or whatever.

Posted by: WaPoLiveFan16 | December 17, 2009 9:12 AM | Report abuse

Yeah, you're right, not crazy. Let's play along. Here is cynicism for ya. Things improved when they changed to the new + improved, EXTRA easy play call wrist band for Campbell. Hey, it worked. He's played great since.

Posted by: TheDubb | December 17, 2009 10:23 AM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company