Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
On Twitter: dcsportsbog and PostSports  |  Facebook  |  E-mail alerts: Redskins and Sports  |  RSS

Caps avoid revisiting Game 7 vs. the Pens

Game 7 versus the Penguins last year was the definition of anti-climax. The final standing ovation was cool, but before that there was at least 30 minutes of awkward, uncomfortable silence. Not the way that series was supposed to end. Someone told me this week that his brother bought a high-priced ticket to the game but was ensconced in a local drinking establishment well before the game ended, and I can't say I blame him.

And yes, a regular season game in mid-January is a tad different, but still, this was our first time chance to return to the braying "rivalry rivalry rivalry" media pack from last Spring, and I wasn't about to miss that. My question of the day, which the evil Tarik partially touched on in his main preview, was simple: Have you gone back and watched Game 7 and to figure out what happened? Some of the answers are above; here's the word version.

"Oh, I've watched it again, yeah," Bruce Boudreau said. "It took me a while, but I watched it again. It was as bad as watching it the first time. We stunk; they were great....It was like a woe is me, what could have been type thing. And then the first couple times I could only watch until they scored the first goal. Then I gutted it out and watched it all. But hey, they deserved it. they kicked our butts in that last game. I wasn't trying to break it down or nothing, I was just trying to look at where we screwed up and how good they are."

His players took a different approach.

"Didn't watch the whole game," Tom Poti said.

"No," Matt Bradley said. "We obviously all remember it, it's something you don't forget. I don't think there's really any need to watch it. I mean, we got beaten handily, end of story."

"No," Shaone Morrisonn said. "Why would I watch that? That's in the past now."

"No," Brian Pothier said. "If it's on, maybe some day, but I'm not gonna go and dig it out somewhere to watch."

"No," David Steckel said, in what was something of a theme. "We laid an egg. There's nothing great to watch about it other than Pittsburgh winning. I don't want to see anything like that."

And what went wrong? How did a tense, edge-of-your-seat series end with dud?

"We just didn't play well," Morrisonn said. "It's like we ran out of gas, and they were just the better team and they took it to us."

"Everyone has their theory on what happened, but I don't think anyone will ever really know what the real reason was," Bradley said. "But we lost the game, that's the main thing. Whether it was 3-2 or 7-2, we didn't get it done."

The players sort of disagreed about whether or not the game has been wiped from their memories. Obviously I don't expect them to be thinking about May when they step on the ice in Pittsburgh, but I think about that game from time to time, and I sure didn't have as much invested in it as they did. Some said they still remember, and some said the slate's been wiped clean.

"It's long, long since gone," Pothier said.

"You'll probably never get over it," Steckel said.

"I thought about it for a little while and it just kind of goes away," Poti said.

"You think what if all the time, what if we had won the game," Bradley said.

But the quote of the day probably belonged to Eric Fehr, who didn't play in Game 7 and barely played in the series. He said he didn't need to re-watch the game since he got to see it live, and he said it was good to face Pittsburgh again.

"Obviously we're disappointed that they beat us," he said. "They stole what we wanted, and we've got to go through them if we want to win the Cup. Any time is a good time to be playing them."

By Dan Steinberg  |  January 21, 2010; 5:39 AM ET
Categories:  Caps  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Jose Theodore on his ovation
Next: Redskins tell fans "The Future is Now"


The media is making way too much of this game. If they win great. If they don't, doesn't much matter, except that Pissburgh picks up two points in the race for overall best in the conference. No one will remember either way come playoff time.

Posted by: poguesmahone | January 21, 2010 10:34 AM | Report abuse

It might not mean much to the Pens, pogues, but it means something to the Caps, whether they will admit it on camera or not.

Posted by: BobLHead | January 21, 2010 11:24 AM | Report abuse

"The media is making way too much of this game."

It's January, talk to me in May.

- Ray

Posted by: rmcazz | January 21, 2010 12:51 PM | Report abuse

Might as well win the game, but correct, only beating the Pens in the playoffs matters.

Media coverage is media coverage, though. Much appreciated.

Posted by: CF11555 | January 21, 2010 3:05 PM | Report abuse

What is it exactly that Eric Fehr thinks the Pens stole?

Posted by: SDpens | January 21, 2010 4:02 PM | Report abuse

I try avoiding to think back to that game as well, uhhhhh

Posted by: Dlewis10 | January 24, 2010 11:41 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company